Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted

Been thinking about adding a single banner ad to the site so we don't have to rely so much on donations. How do you guys feel about it?

I feel like most of you already use ad blockers so it'd only matter for the randos we get anyways.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
  On 4/21/2019 at 11:33 PM, K_N said:

Been thinking about adding a single banner ad to the site so we don't have to rely so much on donations. How do you guys feel about it?

I feel like most of you already use ad blockers so it'd only matter for the randos we get anyways.

Expand  

I'm in that camp. Do ads work on just traffic, or do they only pay if someone clicks it? I have no idea how these things work.

Posted
  On 4/21/2019 at 11:36 PM, Skiles said:

I'm in that camp. Do ads work on just traffic, or do they only pay if someone clicks it? I have no idea how these things work.

Expand  

It depends on the type of ad, some are pay per impression, some are pay per click and some are only pay if the user clicks and buys something/signs up. In order of low to high from the value we'd get from each.

Posted
  On 4/21/2019 at 11:38 PM, K_N said:

It depends on the type of ad, some are pay per impression, some are pay per click and some are only pay if the user clicks and buys something/signs up. In order of low to high from the value we'd get from each.

Expand  

I would be willing to disable ad block on this site. And if the ad is interesting, I might even click it. Why not, right?

  • Like 3
Posted

Basic thoughts based on the 'what not to do' stuff I've seen elsewhere.

Single ad, non-invasive / non-hyper, static if possible that would only change with page refreshes instead of bunny-hugging the shit out of bandwidth and refusing to allow any of the site to physically load until it loads.

If places stuck to that, they'd be able to request their users to whitelist the place for the passive eyes without ruining the site experience and have a small but steady income on it. 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 4/21/2019 at 11:52 PM, katt_goddess said:

Basic thoughts based on the 'what not to do' stuff I've seen elsewhere.

Single ad, non-invasive / non-hyper, static if possible that would only change with page refreshes instead of bunny-hugging the shit out of bandwidth and refusing to allow any of the site to physically load until it loads.

If places stuck to that, they'd be able to request their users to whitelist the place for the passive eyes without ruining the site experience and have a small but steady income on it. 

Expand  

This. 

Posted

I don't mind pausing adblock for sites like this as long as I don't get bombarded with pop ups etc..  I think some size/resolution adjustments could be made still I paused adblock and it looked like the folder tabs got a bit stretched out or something.

Posted
  On 4/22/2019 at 4:41 PM, PhilosipherStoned said:

I don't mind pausing adblock for sites like this as long as I don't get bombarded with pop ups etc..  I think some size/resolution adjustments could be made still I paused adblock and it looked like the folder tabs got a bit stretched out or something.

Expand  

image.png

this is the only thing that should have changed, layout-wise

Posted
  On 4/23/2019 at 12:03 AM, PhilosipherStoned said:

Kind of pushes everything to the right of my screen though. @midnight said he might be experiencing the same problem since his laptop screen is small. At any rate it looks fine with adblock on, and it might not even be an issue on mobile/ bigger better sized/ resolution monitors.

Expand  

Yeah it pushes everything to the right for me. But disco’s laptop is a lot bigger than mine and her’s is doing it as well. I’ll have to look into the ad blocker.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 4/21/2019 at 11:52 PM, katt_goddess said:

Basic thoughts based on the 'what not to do' stuff I've seen elsewhere.

Single ad, non-invasive / non-hyper, static if possible that would only change with page refreshes instead of bunny-hugging the shit out of bandwidth and refusing to allow any of the site to physically load until it loads.

If places stuck to that, they'd be able to request their users to whitelist the place for the passive eyes without ruining the site experience and have a small but steady income on it. 

Expand  

Not that I come here that often, but basically this.

Posted (edited)
  On 4/23/2019 at 11:49 AM, Clu said:

Fuck ya!

Screenshot_20190423-074856_Chrome.jpg

Expand  

I don't know if I should be more upset about this, or that I've gotten 3 ads for dating sites in a row.

Edited by mthor
5 now. I'm beginning to take this personally.
  • Haha 4
Posted
  On 4/23/2019 at 11:59 AM, mthor said:

I don't know if I should be more upset about this, or that I've gotten 3 ads for dating sites in a row.

Expand  

Fit singles in my area.

Horny single moms

Posted

I mean, I guess you can't be picky for ad revenue but I'm a bit shocked that KN or Pat are cool with offshore drilling ads.

I didn't click it... Because fuck that

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...