Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Trumpist Insurrection in DC

_lost_username_

By _lost_username_
in Current Events

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Raptorpat
Raptorpat

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/13/politics/coffee-county-georgia-voting-system-breach-trump

Raptorpat
Raptorpat

lol https://fox59.com/indiana-news/jan-6-rioter-recently-pardoned-by-trump-shot-killed-by-indiana-sheriffs-deputy-while-resisting-arrest/

SwimOdin
SwimOdin

When the base turns on him for this, he’ll deny specificity.

Posted Images

Raptorpat Monster Mutant

Raptorpat

Posted
Posted
On 9/6/2022 at 2:27 PM, Jman said:

This is the first case ruled on in over 100 years to successfully apply the Insurrection Act.

Does it directly involve the insurrection act? The article says it's the disqualification clause of the 14th amendment, which

On 9/6/2022 at 3:10 PM, Sawdy said:

Not sure if this can be used for precedence now? I mean, it’s the first time something had been ruled as an insurrection here right?

If anything, it will probably be appealed and will be an interesting test case on it's applicability.

The other, unhelpful legal argument is that that the disqualification clause only applies to the OG civil war. If it was appealed in the federal system and SCOTUS went in that direction, that'd be a real shame.

  • Thanks 3
Sawdy Luminary

Sawdy

Posted
Posted
Just now, naraku360 said:

"Don't judge a book by its cover."

The book:

m62546063602_1.jpg?1644207946

“It’s a beautiful town with wonderful history… I only meant to highlight how amazing it was to visit… albeit… 80 years too late”

  • Thanks 1
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
On 8/29/2022 at 2:30 PM, Sawdy said:

F1313A13-DDF9-4B1B-B9D2-1B07EA58FAA5.jpeg

Meanwhile in Texas they refuse to release numbers on women dying because of their draconian abortion laws until after the elections. In Trumpland all you hear are crickets about it. 
 

It’s ok to bury information and drop immigrants off at the doorstep of the VPOTUS as long as it helps whichever side you’re on. 

  • Thanks 1
Seight Monster Mutant

Seight

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Sieg67 said:

A bit of old news but I don't remember it seeing it mentioned. Trump owes over 1.6 million on his Truth Social platform.
Turns out the guy who is known for not paying his bills hasn't been paying his bills.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/trump-truth-social-accused-stiffing-003058432.html

Investors have been losing money but their cult mentality is stopping quite a few of them from cutting their losses.
They've lost their life savings and it's only getting worse for them.

simpsons search GIF

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Raptorpat Monster Mutant

Raptorpat

Posted
Posted

The Commission is about to take a public vote to subpoena Trump.

Pre-vote, Liz Cheney just walked through everyone who had spoken to Trump directly in connection with Jan 6/election denials and either invoked the fifth or refused to testify.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
SwimModSponges Monster Mutant

SwimModSponges

Posted
Posted

"Tweet #TRUMPYES to @J6COMMISSION to vote to subpoena, tweet #TRUMPNO to vote against. Its time to make your voice heard america! And after this commercial break we'll be back with the winner from last season, and they're spilling all the tea."

Sorry, been watching lots of Real Housewives of Miami lately.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted

Jan 6 committee voted unanimously to subpoena Trump. He’s not gonna be doing that. For all his “ask me anything I got nothing to hide” shit talk he will fight the subpoena.  He would only plead the 5th on every question anyway 

 

  • Thanks 1
SwimModSponges Monster Mutant

SwimModSponges

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, DragonSinger said:

This is the only time in my life I would have been cheering for her ass.

I'm now seeing people claiming the whole thing was staged because "Why would she have a camera crew with her?"

  • Thanks 1
Ginguy Freakin Mutant

Ginguy

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Raptorpat said:

The Commission is about to take a public vote to subpoena Trump.

Pre-vote, Liz Cheney just walked through everyone who had spoken to Trump directly in connection with Jan 6/election denials and either invoked the fifth or refused to testify.

How dare someone assert their Constitutional right to not get involved with a sham committee. Harrumph I say!

In other news, apparently Pelosi thinks it is acceptable to assault the President, knew it was illegal to do so and didn't care. I mean, threatening the President is a crime after all, wonder if there will be charges filed....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11314419/January-6-footage-not-aired-Thursdays-hearing-shows-Nancy-Pelosi-threaten-HIT-Trump.html

Hmm, "I was waiting for this." sure seems like a statement that indicates prior knowledge. Maybe add her to the list of people that need to preserve records....

 

  • D'oh 2
scoobdog Monster Mutant

scoobdog

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ginguy said:

How dare someone assert their Constitutional right to not get involved with a sham committee. Harrumph I say!

That's in the constitution too?!  Holy shit.

  • Haha 1
DragonSinger Paragon

DragonSinger

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SwimModSponges said:

I'm now seeing people claiming the whole thing was staged because "Why would she have a camera crew with her?"

That's why I only would have cheered her on if she actually did it. Talk is cheap. I want to see fisticuffs.

naraku360 Monster Mutant

naraku360

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Ginguy said:

In other news, apparently Pelosi thinks it is acceptable to assault the President, knew it was illegal to do so and didn't care. I mean, threatening the President is a crime after all, wonder if there will be charges filed....

Your special snowflake is showing.

  • Like 1
Seight Monster Mutant

Seight

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Ginguy said:

How dare someone assert their Constitutional right to not get involved with a sham committee. Harrumph I say!

In other news, apparently Pelosi thinks it is acceptable to assault the President, knew it was illegal to do so and didn't care. I mean, threatening the President is a crime after all, wonder if there will be charges filed....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11314419/January-6-footage-not-aired-Thursdays-hearing-shows-Nancy-Pelosi-threaten-HIT-Trump.html

Hmm, "I was waiting for this." sure seems like a statement that indicates prior knowledge. Maybe add her to the list of people that need to preserve records....

 

Why, that's almost as bad as telling a large crowd of people that you will march to the Capitol with them, after which some of those people breach the inside of the Capitol and cause widespread property destruction while the results of the election for President of the United States are being finalized.

Thank God that didn't happen though, right?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
PenguinBoss Superstar

PenguinBoss

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Ginguy said:

Hmm, "I was waiting for this." sure seems like a statement that indicates prior knowledge. Maybe add her to the list of people that need to preserve records....

 

In this case "prior knowledge" meaning "common sense."

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...