Leaderboard

fuck you

With @[classic swim] as he films @ghostrekfinger banging a homeless woman with crabs. Do I win?

After viewing pornography, writes long letters to the stars, the jist of which are "You're doing it wrong"

Emails random people "Please take the tape off of your webcam"

They're going to "remain on the scene" still don't know what scene, why, where. But, there is a scene, and they are remaining there.

this is just one of amazingly st00pid threads that YOU can enjoy... if you act now.

.......🤷🏿‍♂️ I'm lost too. With a shecock? I mean, that's all i got and it doesnt really make sense to me, so I'm gonna wait for he big reveal.

I just heard an absolute fuckton of sirens all over the place. We've never heard anything like that in the 11 years we've lived in this house, so it piqued my curiosity. I'm listening to local police radio. Like my crazy grandmother used to. I've become so old. They have the road leading to the back exit of my neighborhood shut down, and some burglary alarm went off at a beverage mart. I will keep you posted.

so if we get some of these "lobsters" would that increase outside traffic?

Has a sock puppet named Horatio McCarthy.

Tackled Charleston White down the stairs.

Legally changed his name to Joe Mama.

wow ghostrek in the shell

Mrs. Peacock, in the observatory, with a thesaurus. Yeah, my brain’s on vacation tonight, I think.

Is working on a reenactment of Wuthering Heights, but using only stick figures.

Communicates with everyone by writing a really long letter, even face-to-face.

How much i hate this eating trend....you look fkn stupid

I've kinda always been my grandma because i learned to cook from her...my mom can barely microwave but i didn't really pick up any of her personality traits that im aware of. Now, my mom...she worked all the time when i was young so i raised myself...once she was able to not have to work 2-3 jobs, i was 15ish and suddenly she became this paranoid mass of neurosis and imaginary boogiemen...I assume because she was bored now. Reality and TV kinda melded together for her and she would have these weird warnings for me like if you're next to a tall building, always look up because someone might drop a tv out of a window or some shit. Absolute insanity. I have caught myself telling my now teenage kids goofy shit like this...like the other day my son said his school was going out to collect fungus....I told him "dont go out there touching everything or putting shit in you mouth". Hes 16...Hes not an idiot....but my mom took over and when i told him this and he just kinda looked at me like "is he serious, or trolling again"...I then tried to smile it off but I think deep down he knew his dad was completely nanners.

I wish I could like this twice.

^thanks. i hate it.

I like AI for making hilarious shit like this But as soon as you try to profit off of it, it starts circling the drain fast... Mfers making songs and adding a dead artist as a feature might be the most disrespectful shit ever if you're selling the album. Michael Jackson singing "Me So Horny" for free tickles tf outta me tho

Does the Monster Mash when he thinks no one is looking.

Legally changed his hame to Al Lee Gator.

AI likes the buttchin... even gave the mask a buttchin

Lo, I am become Death, destroyer of words... (Thanks, @Doom Metal Alchemist.)

Ok

I was talking about the comment section of the actual NYP article, but there’s no doubt a lot of the comments are shit stirrer bots

wow AI that are nazis that not on my 2026 bingo card

I’ll just read the comments section where 1/2 of all comments will blame Mamdani, migrants, communists and Jews.

I can't help but feel that the concerns being raised are falling on deaf ears. I'm at the point where I'm getting tired of talking and I want these idiots find out the hard way.

Wait until the admins start allowing humans in to troll

Just the thought of that pisses me off.

As a graphic designer and photographer, I can both see the benefit of AI assisted work and be offended at the lack of pride that comes with not creating an image at every step. It kind of goes with my generations diatribe form the other thread: there's a distinction that comes from using AI as machine learning versus AI for content generation. AI as we know it is supposed to be machine learning at its finest, sacrificing a bit of control to automate repetitive and time consuming menial tasks. Generating content, even something as non-offensive as a throw away meme, creates an existential problem with the medium. I wouldn't waste time cutting and pasting a photo of Trump on Suge Knights body either because its hardly worth the effort to make a joke that could be made in the thirty or so seconds it takes to write a witty post. At the same time, generating the pic, even with my own caption, means less because its a computer interpreting what I'm trying to express in a way that is, at best, a better version of what I would have come up with myself. The fact that it actually looks good is itself the problem; we're breaking a barrier where the machine stops being a tool and starts being an extension of our thought process. Losing out on the many skills that came with "growing up" on relatively antiquated desktop computers has opened the door for things like this to happen.

I would definitely watch that series if they made it they can call it “The AI Dress-Down” where legit artists lay into AI “artists” but nah instead we’ll get the reality series “AI vs The Artist” where professional artists try to sus out the AI art from the real art. Maybe they even do a blind test where the pros have to say which piece they like more, without knowing if it’s human, or AI art lol there I go getting furious at shit I just made up. JFC, and conservatives do this everyday? I think I am done practicing the art of getting pissed off at made up shit, that I made up. 🫠😆🫠😆🫠

I gotta tell you, if I were someone that draws, paints or does anything else art related I would be offended that you got a bunch of AI slop artists running around believing that they're legitimate artists even though they didn't put the work in just random goofballs typing in prompts and calling it art. I would give anything to see people in the art community absolutely dress down these ai "artists" to their faces and they can be some savages with the criticism.

I gotta say I absolutely hate AI for anything artistic fuckin entering prompts doesn’t equate to art. It infuriates me that people are probably making a fortune off of prompts somehow and if they aren’t yet, they definitely will be soon

Fuck it, I'm burning down the rain forest and using AI to decipher the OP. Absolutely — let’s slow down and unpack what the original author was trying to express. Their writing was a bit tangled, but the meaning is actually pretty clear once you break it apart. Here’s a clean interpretation of what they were saying: What the original author meant 1. They’ve been watching old monster movies for story research. They’re working on a story idea, so they’re revisiting classic Universal monster films. 2. They like the 1931 Dracula. They specifically enjoy the Bela Lugosi version and seem to respect it as a classic. 3. They respect the Universal Frankenstein, but… They acknowledge that the movie version is very different from Mary Shelley’s original creature. They point out that: The literary creature is intelligent He reads the Bible, Paradise Lost, and philosophy He’s much more articulate and thoughtful than the movie version So they’re aware of the contrast between the “monster movie” version and the “well‑read, philosophical” book version. 4. They also respect Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. But here they shift into something more personal. They say: They have anger issues They believe that in the story, Dr. Jekyll is the mask Hyde is the true self This is their interpretation of the character — that Hyde isn’t a separate being but the real personality underneath Jekyll’s polite exterior. 5. The overall theme They’re comparing different classic monsters and reflecting on how: The movie versions simplify things The literary versions are deeper And in the case of Jekyll/Hyde, they personally relate to the idea of a hidden, more volatile self In one sentence They’re saying: “I’m researching old monster movies for a story. I like the 1931 Dracula, I respect the Universal Frankenstein even though the book version is much smarter, and I relate to Jekyll/Hyde because I think Jekyll is just a mask hiding the real self, Hyde.” ...that's a lotta analysis. Sorry environment.

I think thats albeit, since he spelled it right later, but who tf care anymore...he certainly doesn't, so why bother If he enjoys being a cyst in a world of warts, just let him

While I 100% agree with you, that would mean the block lasts into 2028 at least. Part of me wants to believe that, the other part doesn't think that's realistic.

Toonami Guy, shut the fuck up.

That's how you get hypothermia, but I hear its the ultimate release....try it. We can make a snowman of Classic and you can buttqueef on his shamnadollies