Leaderboard

fuck you

They're going to "remain on the scene" still don't know what scene, why, where. But, there is a scene, and they are remaining there.

After viewing pornography, writes long letters to the stars, the jist of which are "You're doing it wrong"

Emails random people "Please take the tape off of your webcam"

How much i hate this eating trend....you look fkn stupid

I just heard an absolute fuckton of sirens all over the place. We've never heard anything like that in the 11 years we've lived in this house, so it piqued my curiosity. I'm listening to local police radio. Like my crazy grandmother used to. I've become so old. They have the road leading to the back exit of my neighborhood shut down, and some burglary alarm went off at a beverage mart. I will keep you posted.

so if we get some of these "lobsters" would that increase outside traffic?

Tackled Charleston White down the stairs.

wow ghostrek in the shell

Communicates with everyone by writing a really long letter, even face-to-face.

Has a sock puppet named Horatio McCarthy.

I was talking about the comment section of the actual NYP article, but there’s no doubt a lot of the comments are shit stirrer bots

wow AI that are nazis that not on my 2026 bingo card

I’ll just read the comments section where 1/2 of all comments will blame Mamdani, migrants, communists and Jews.

I can't help but feel that the concerns being raised are falling on deaf ears. I'm at the point where I'm getting tired of talking and I want these idiots find out the hard way.

Legally changed his name to Joe Mama.

I wish I could like this twice.

Wait until the admins start allowing humans in to troll

Just the thought of that pisses me off.

As a graphic designer and photographer, I can both see the benefit of AI assisted work and be offended at the lack of pride that comes with not creating an image at every step. It kind of goes with my generations diatribe form the other thread: there's a distinction that comes from using AI as machine learning versus AI for content generation. AI as we know it is supposed to be machine learning at its finest, sacrificing a bit of control to automate repetitive and time consuming menial tasks. Generating content, even something as non-offensive as a throw away meme, creates an existential problem with the medium. I wouldn't waste time cutting and pasting a photo of Trump on Suge Knights body either because its hardly worth the effort to make a joke that could be made in the thirty or so seconds it takes to write a witty post. At the same time, generating the pic, even with my own caption, means less because its a computer interpreting what I'm trying to express in a way that is, at best, a better version of what I would have come up with myself. The fact that it actually looks good is itself the problem; we're breaking a barrier where the machine stops being a tool and starts being an extension of our thought process. Losing out on the many skills that came with "growing up" on relatively antiquated desktop computers has opened the door for things like this to happen.

^thanks. i hate it.

I would definitely watch that series if they made it they can call it “The AI Dress-Down” where legit artists lay into AI “artists” but nah instead we’ll get the reality series “AI vs The Artist” where professional artists try to sus out the AI art from the real art. Maybe they even do a blind test where the pros have to say which piece they like more, without knowing if it’s human, or AI art lol there I go getting furious at shit I just made up. JFC, and conservatives do this everyday? I think I am done practicing the art of getting pissed off at made up shit, that I made up. 🫠😆🫠😆🫠

I like AI for making hilarious shit like this But as soon as you try to profit off of it, it starts circling the drain fast... Mfers making songs and adding a dead artist as a feature might be the most disrespectful shit ever if you're selling the album. Michael Jackson singing "Me So Horny" for free tickles tf outta me tho

I gotta tell you, if I were someone that draws, paints or does anything else art related I would be offended that you got a bunch of AI slop artists running around believing that they're legitimate artists even though they didn't put the work in just random goofballs typing in prompts and calling it art. I would give anything to see people in the art community absolutely dress down these ai "artists" to their faces and they can be some savages with the criticism.

I gotta say I absolutely hate AI for anything artistic fuckin entering prompts doesn’t equate to art. It infuriates me that people are probably making a fortune off of prompts somehow and if they aren’t yet, they definitely will be soon

AI likes the buttchin... even gave the mask a buttchin

Fuck it, I'm burning down the rain forest and using AI to decipher the OP. Absolutely — let’s slow down and unpack what the original author was trying to express. Their writing was a bit tangled, but the meaning is actually pretty clear once you break it apart. Here’s a clean interpretation of what they were saying: What the original author meant 1. They’ve been watching old monster movies for story research. They’re working on a story idea, so they’re revisiting classic Universal monster films. 2. They like the 1931 Dracula. They specifically enjoy the Bela Lugosi version and seem to respect it as a classic. 3. They respect the Universal Frankenstein, but… They acknowledge that the movie version is very different from Mary Shelley’s original creature. They point out that: The literary creature is intelligent He reads the Bible, Paradise Lost, and philosophy He’s much more articulate and thoughtful than the movie version So they’re aware of the contrast between the “monster movie” version and the “well‑read, philosophical” book version. 4. They also respect Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. But here they shift into something more personal. They say: They have anger issues They believe that in the story, Dr. Jekyll is the mask Hyde is the true self This is their interpretation of the character — that Hyde isn’t a separate being but the real personality underneath Jekyll’s polite exterior. 5. The overall theme They’re comparing different classic monsters and reflecting on how: The movie versions simplify things The literary versions are deeper And in the case of Jekyll/Hyde, they personally relate to the idea of a hidden, more volatile self In one sentence They’re saying: “I’m researching old monster movies for a story. I like the 1931 Dracula, I respect the Universal Frankenstein even though the book version is much smarter, and I relate to Jekyll/Hyde because I think Jekyll is just a mask hiding the real self, Hyde.” ...that's a lotta analysis. Sorry environment.

Lo, I am become Death, destroyer of words... (Thanks, @Doom Metal Alchemist.)

I think thats albeit, since he spelled it right later, but who tf care anymore...he certainly doesn't, so why bother If he enjoys being a cyst in a world of warts, just let him

Ok

While I 100% agree with you, that would mean the block lasts into 2028 at least. Part of me wants to believe that, the other part doesn't think that's realistic.

Toonami Guy, shut the fuck up.

FUCKING SNOW! 😡

no shave november. i can corn row my leg hair......

i really hate that i laughed at this.

I have. I made you a snow cone, Ghosty.

That's how you get hypothermia, but I hear its the ultimate release....try it. We can make a snowman of Classic and you can buttqueef on his shamnadollies

It was a car accident, a Mazda. Less exciting, more sad.