Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, mthor said:

Dude, you're giving the rest of us boomers a bad name. If you can't follow simple instructions,  maybe it's time to see about getting a carer.

I even put instructions in caps 😆

  • Haha 4
Posted
9 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

I zoomed in.  Nothing but block pixels.

Again, I even added instructions to the post because I knew you’d play this game. So, you can tap or click the image, as instructed, or you can continue to embarrass yourself by saying how illegible it is. It’s up to you. Irdgaf because you’re going to say something stupid regardless. 

  • Like 2
Posted

This is the equivalent of saying "I looked real close at the link and couldn't se-

Oh. Right. Has probably said literally exactly that before, too.

Getting dumber by the minute. Thinks zooming in is the same as opening an image preview.

This is a level of stupid that should get tech privileges taken away.

  • Thanks 3
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

I even put instructions in caps 😆

Like I was going to look for your point when I already know you can't make one.

 

Your chart stopped eighteen years ago.  It shows an average of 37 between January of 1960 and January of 2007 (just down the January column) and it's conveniently missing any data between January 2008 and January 2025.

 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1262433195610306/

Edited by The Evil Dr. Longshadow
  • D'oh 1
Posted

Oh. I see what's happening now. Nobody taught it to use a touch screen with their fingers, which must've resulted in severe brain damage by repeatedly smashing its head on the device in an attempt to operate it.

Severe brain damage seems like the most reasonable explanation for not understanding the idea of having multiple images in a row.

  • Haha 3
Posted
17 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Like I was going to look for your point when I already know you can't make one.

 

Your chart stopped eighteen years ago.  It shows an average of 37 between January of 1960 and January of 2007 (just down the January column) and it's conveniently missing any data between January 2008 and January 2025.

 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1262433195610306/

I wasn’t linking the entire chart for you. Just the first page and the last two which covers 40 years. I’m not clicking your stupid facebook links

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

I'm waiting on him to say either his phone can't do that or that pooh didn't tell him he had to open the picture first.

Now its information is missing which it isn’t. He’s so fuckin lazy he can’t look up the information himself 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The graph I posted has 1880-1910 you can clearly see that 1911-1912 is part of the chart but that I didn’t include that. I figured 1960-2025 was more than enough information and 1880-1910 enough reference of the late 18th-the early 19th century 

“2025 is conveniently left blank” when the year isn’t even done yet is the dumbest shit yet 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

The graph I posted has 1880-1910 you can clearly see that 1911-1912 is part of the chart but that I didn’t include that. I figured 1960-2025 was more than enough information and 1880-1910 enough reference of the late 18th-the early 19th century 

“2025 is conveniently left blank” when the year isn’t even done yet is the dumbest shit yet 

Look, if you really think it's still 2007, you need the advice in that Facebook link now more than ever.

Oh, and I SAID, it's missing eighteen of the most recent years.

I'm NOT going to chase them, either.

BTW, January of 2025 was six months ago.  That's plenty of time to chart it, since I was only counting January periods through the years.

Edited by The Evil Dr. Longshadow
  • D'oh 1
Posted

There's more than one image. Because there are many years. And in the additional image includes the years you evidently fried what little grey matter you ever had.

You really shouldn't be using technology you don't understand.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, rpgamer said:

There's more than one image. Because there are many years. And in the additional image includes the years you evidently fried what little grey matter you ever had.

You really shouldn't be using technology you don't understand.

Okay, I'm done in this thread.

I'm leaving you with just the advice in the Facebook link.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Okay, I'm done in this thread.

I'm leaving you with just the advice in the Facebook link.

 

Can you be done with this site too?

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
43 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

lulz

facebook science

Between his “anyone can post to wikipedia. Here’s a facebook link you should check out” and his inability to open images, he really made himself look ridiculous in here. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

It’s hot af again. In the 90s w feel likes over 100. Mayor Adams all over talking about stay cool but conserve energy but come to a cooling station but stay home. Idk lol 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
On 7/7/2025 at 8:03 PM, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

And... averages don't reflect what is commonplace. 

 

On 7/7/2025 at 8:14 PM, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

When was the last time you saw an average that actually reflected what is commonplace?  

Are we all really just gonna gloss over this? ^^

  • Haha 8
Posted
58 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

 

Are we all really just gonna gloss over this? ^^

 

5 minutes ago, Top Gun said:

I was trying to ignore it to protect my brain.

Exactly why I ignored it too. While it’s true that averages don’t necessarily reflect what’s common place because an outlier can skew the average, this was something that was over 10 years worth of averages in the making. 

  • Thanks 3
Posted
26 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

 

Exactly why I ignored it too. While it’s true that averages don’t necessarily reflect what’s common place because an outlier can skew the average, this was something that was over 10 years worth of averages in the making. 

Do we have any other method of figuring out what's common place?

Posted
49 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

Do we have any other method of figuring out what's common place?

Nope but I wasn’t going there with him because he knows damn well that averages are largely used to figure out exactly what he claims they do not. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

I've lived next to a truck depot, train tracks, the Orange/Green lines ("L" tracks) & a police/fire station.  I can normally sleep through anything - but the rain last night woke me up at least 3 times.  Abnormally roaring loud.  This morning they said we got 3 inches of rain (I seriously doubt it, the river nearby wasn't much higher than usual).  Right now, we're under a Tornado Watch.

Edited by tsar4
  • Like 2
Posted
On 7/10/2025 at 11:58 AM, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

 

Are we all really just gonna gloss over this? ^^

It’s hard to be as smart as him when you’re as stupid as him.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...