Icarus27k Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 This is one of the least serious charges he is accused of. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted May 17, 2023 Author Share Posted May 17, 2023 Robert Garcia filed a motion to expel George Santos from Congress, I don't know the procedural details but McCarty has to act apparently and he's gonna route it into the Ethics Committee rather than a floor vote. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/16/house-gop-santos-expulsion-00097216 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted May 17, 2023 Share Posted May 17, 2023 8 hours ago, Raptorpat said: Robert Garcia filed a motion to expel George Santos from Congress, I don't know the procedural details but McCarty has to act apparently and he's gonna route it into the Ethics Committee rather than a floor vote. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/16/house-gop-santos-expulsion-00097216 Can't even bring myself to do the "surely the Ethics Committee will do the right thing here" joke. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted May 17, 2023 Author Share Posted May 17, 2023 1 hour ago, Seight said: Can't even bring myself to do the "surely the Ethics Committee will do the right thing here" joke. Just take it with a smile, like George Santos would 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenguinBoss Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 Bunch of moralless cowards. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discolé monade Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 yet, another reason why i think candidates should go through some sort of vetting process. and of course he's going to be protected. they are all going to be protected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted June 6, 2023 Author Share Posted June 6, 2023 Quote * Rep. George Santos’ lawyer said yesterday the indicted New York Republican would risk going to jail to protect the identities of the people who cosigned the $500,000 bond enabling his pretrial release, The Associated Press reports. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted June 6, 2023 Share Posted June 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Raptorpat said: You mean George Washington, Santa Clause, E.Ster Bunneh might have to come forward and prove they totally signed off on things and got his bill if he runs to Canada to reclaim the Northern Throne? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenguinBoss Posted June 6, 2023 Share Posted June 6, 2023 I feel like he'd go to jail either way. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted June 23, 2023 Author Share Posted June 23, 2023 Quote George Santos’ father and aunt backed his bail bond, court papers show, by POLITICO’s Erica Orden: It’s unclear why Santos went to such lengths to protect the disclosure of his father and aunt as having secured his bond. His lawyer had previously said that Santos had been the target of attacks that are "extremely angry, anti-gay, anti-Republican and all around anti-social," and argued that his sureties, if publicly named, would be vulnerable to similar behavior. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwimOdin Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Maybe he thought speculation on who funded it would drown out all the fraud? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Are we really sure it was his dad and aunt and not himself in different wigs? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 6 minutes ago, katt_goddess said: Are we really sure it was his dad and aunt and not himself in different wigs? My thoughts exactly 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted June 27, 2023 Author Share Posted June 27, 2023 https://twitter.com/Santos4Congress/status/1673493762755149824 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 8 hours ago, Raptorpat said: https://twitter.com/Santos4Congress/status/1673493762755149824 Oh shit, Biden was running for President AND Congress?!? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 10 hours ago, Seight said: Oh shit, Biden was running for President AND Congress?!? No no no, Santos is actually totally the President now from that vote and therefore has super immunity for the duration of his Presidential term of 4 Alpha Centauri A years [ 320 Earth years ]. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 3 hours ago, katt_goddess said: No no no, Santos is actually totally the President now from that vote and therefore has super immunity for the duration of his Presidential term of 4 Alpha Centauri A years [ 320 Earth years ]. Whoa 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted August 16, 2023 Author Share Posted August 16, 2023 Quote A campaign associate of Representative George Santos who impersonated Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s former chief of staff was charged with wire fraud and identity theft in a federal indictment unsealed on Wednesday. The aide, Samuel Miele, was arraigned Wednesday morning in Brooklyn federal court and released on $150,000 bond. He has pleaded not guilty. He was accused by federal prosecutors of sending “fraudulent fund-raising” emails to more than a dozen potential contributors to an unnamed candidate. In those messages, he claimed to be a “high-ranking aide to a member of the House with leadership responsibilities,” the indictment said. When Mr. Miele successfully solicited campaign contributions, he received a 15 percent commission, according to the indictment. The indictment, which was filed on Tuesday, does not name Mr. Santos, a first-term Republican representing parts of Long Island and Queens. Nor does it provide more details about the House aide Mr. Miele is said to have impersonated or the member with whom he is associated. But The New York Times and other news outlets have previously reported that Mr. Miele impersonated Mr. McCarthy’s chief of staff in a bid to solicit funds for Mr. Santos’s campaign. Mr. McCarthy later confirmed those reports and said that Mr. Miele was fired after Mr. Santos learned of his actions. Mr. Miele was charged with four counts of wire fraud in connection with specific emails he sent between August and October 2021. He was also charged with aggravated identity theft. The case against Mr. Miele was filed by the same prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York who are prosecuting Mr. Santos in a separate case involving wire fraud. In a letter filed on Wednesday, prosecutors advised the court that the cases should be considered related. Mr. Santos has been charged with 13 counts of money laundering, wire fraud, theft of public funds and false statements following an investigation into his finances. He has pleaded not guilty. A lawyer for Mr. Santos did not immediately return a request for comment. According to the indictment, Mr. Miele wrote an email to Mr. Santos in which he admitted “faking my identity to a big donor,” but added that he was “high risk, high reward in everything I do.” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/16/nyregion/sam-miele-charged-george-santos.html 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 6 hours ago, Raptorpat said: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/16/nyregion/sam-miele-charged-george-santos.html HOW DEEP DOES THE RABBIT HOLE GO?!?1? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 33 minutes ago, Seight said: HOW DEEP DOES THE RABBIT HOLE GO?!?1? You know those full length rubber gloves that vet students wear when digging in a cow's ass? At least that deep. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 Rep Santos and associates are such fine upstanding citizens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icarus27k Posted September 7, 2023 Share Posted September 7, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted October 11, 2023 Author Share Posted October 11, 2023 Santos hit with a superseding indictment Quote CENTRAL ISLIP, NY – A 23-count superseding indictment was filed today in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charging George Anthony Devolder Santos, better known as “George Santos,” the United States Representative for the Third District of New York, with one count of conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States, two counts of wire fraud, two counts of making materially false statements to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), two counts of falsifying records submitted to obstruct the FEC, two counts of aggravated identity theft, and one count of access device fraud, in addition to the seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the United States House of Representatives that were charged in the original indictment. Santos is due back in federal court in Central Islip on October 27, 2023. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/congressman-george-santos-charged-conspiracy-wire-fraud-false-statements-0 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sieg67 Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 It's like Santos was seeing what Trump was doing and decided he could do better. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 19 hours ago, Sieg67 said: It's like Santos was seeing what Trump was doing and decided he could do better. Santos seeing all the Drumpf shit filling the airwaves - 'Hold my feather boa.' 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discolé monade Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 (edited) Quote Santos seeing all the Drumpf shit filling the airwaves - 'Hold my feather boa.' Edited October 13, 2023 by discolé monade 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 No no no. He needs to be expelled immediately. Not acceptable George Santos launches into racist and xenophobic tirade…. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sieg67 Posted October 23, 2023 Share Posted October 23, 2023 https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/10/george-santos-lied-about-his-five-year-old-niece-being-kidnapped-by-two-chinese-men/ In other news, fire hot. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discolé monade Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 looking at the antics of 'the lower chamber', gives to the argument 'too much government'. do we really needs these reps? no. i don't think we do. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted November 1, 2023 Author Share Posted November 1, 2023 from Politico this morning: Quote Even as Rep. George Santos’ fellow New York GOP freshmen push to expel him tonight (in a likely doomed vote), tentacles of the Santos scandals are grabbing at the other representatives’ legs. Remember the accountant who said Santos wrongly listed him as treasurer back in January? The Daily Beast reported last week that he actually did the work for Santos’ campaign for four months but hid that potentially embarrassing fact by listing the name of his buddy from high school on official paperwork. And the lawyer for campaign treasurer Thomas Datwyler just rescinded his January statements that claimed Datwyler had been played by Santos, the Daily Beast reported, saying that actually, it looks like Datwyler had played the Federal Election Commission. And the public. Datwyler isn’t some fringe character desperate for a paycheck. He’s also the campaign treasurer for Reps. Anthony D’Esposito and Nick LaLota, two Long Island Republican first-year members who’ve been eager to distance themselves from Santos. Datwyler is the treasurer for New York Majority Makers too, a joint fundraising committee for all the non-Santos swing seat freshmen: Reps. D'Esposito, LaLota, Mike Lawler, Marc Molinaro and Brandon Williams, Playbook has learned. LaLota’s campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, and neither did Datwyler. D’Esposito campaign spokesperson Matthew Capp declined to comment on their treasurer’s alleged pattern of lying to the FEC. Capp confirmed that the campaign has not severed its relationship with Datwyler after the Daily Beast’s reporting, however. And said that D’Esposito did not recommend or refer his treasurer to Santos. By the time Datwyler started working for Santos around Jan. 25, D’Esposito had already publicly rejected Santos and called on him to resign. D’Esposito, LaLota and the rest of them sharing an ex-campaign treasurer with Santos hasn’t been previously reported. But it’s just another example of the reason why D’Esposito introduced the privileged resolution to expel Santos: The dark cloud of their 23-count-indicted colleague is casting a shadow over the rest of the New York GOP. Two-thirds of the House would have to vote yes to boot Santos. But that’s unlikely to pass, since the new Speaker Mike Johnson has suggested he’s aligned with the previous speaker, Kevin McCarthy, who didn’t want to eject Santos because he hadn’t been convicted of anything yet. “We’ve had some Republican offices signal that they’ll support it as well,” Capp from D’Esposito’s office told Playbook. But he couldn’t say if they’d be able to flip the approximately 77 Republican votes it would need to pass. “We don’t have a whip count or anything.” – Jeff Coltin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted November 2, 2023 Author Share Posted November 2, 2023 Quote The embattled Rep. George Santos has lived to embellish and lie another day – no thanks to his fellow first-term New York colleagues who fought hard to convince their colleagues that the lawmaker’s lies and federal indictment were enough to justify ousting him. Not long after Rep. Anthony D'Esposito introduced a resolution to expel Santos, House lawmakers convened Wednesday night to vote on whether they would kick the Long Island Republican out of Congress following his indictment on corruption charges. But in the end, Santos easily survived with 179 members voting for expulsion and 213 opposing it. More than 30 Democrats even voted against expelling him. The expulsion vote faced long odds from the onset. Expelling Santos would require a two-thirds majority, meaning every Democrat would have needed to vote in favor of doing so as would dozens of Republicans. With Republicans clinging to only a narrow majority in the House, that was unlikely to happen as Santos’ vote remained key to the party’s agenda. A number of lawmakers have also expressed concerns that removing Santos before a criminal proceeding or a House Ethics Committee report would only set a dangerous precedent. Santos’ fellow first-term New York Republicans elected to represent more vulnerable swing seats, however, have eagerly attempted to distance themselves from their colleague. Reps. D'Esposito, Reps. Nick LaLota, Mike Lawler, Marc Molinaro and Brandon Williams have led efforts to expel Santos, all of whom signed a new letter urging their Republican colleagues to vote yes while describing the matter as “not a political one but a moral one.” Rep. Nick Langworthy also joined the five lawmakers in voting for Santos’ expulsion. Every other New York Republican voted against the resolution save for Rep. Andrew Garbarino who didn’t vote. On the House floor ahead of the vote, D'Esposito, LaLota, Lawler, and lone Democrat Dan Goldman took turns slamming Santos’ conduct. “Mr. Santos has said expelling him before he is formally charged and found guilty would create a new precedent in this body, one that could have negative consequences for generations,” LaLota said. “I disagree. The consequences and precedents of not expelling him for his lies and fraud has the potential to do far more damage to this institution.” Santos, who maintains his innocence, urged lawmakers to hold off on expulsion, arguing that he deserves due process. “I’m about to go on the floor to debate my expulsion. To all whom who’ve asked, I’m fine and calm,” he tweeted Wednesday evening ahead of the vote. “God does not give each of us a burden heavier than we can carry. I’ll defend myself as best I can and stand up for my constitutional rights to due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. This is not nearly the end of the road for me. God bless all!” The race to unseat Santos in 2024 is already well underway. https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2023/11/george-santos-decisively-not-expelled-congress/391707/ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted November 2, 2023 Share Posted November 2, 2023 54 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2023/11/george-santos-decisively-not-expelled-congress/391707/ ...OR DID HE?!? *dun dun DUH* 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted November 16, 2023 Author Share Posted November 16, 2023 Quote Embattled US Rep George Santos won't run for reelection after damning ethics report By Moira Warburton November 16, 202312:01 PM ESTUpdated 15 min ago WASHINGTON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - Embattled U.S. Representative George Santos on Thursday said he won't run for reelection shortly after a damning report by his fellow lawmakers referred "additional uncharged and unlawful conduct" by him to the Justice Department for possible prosecution. Santos, 35, a first-term lawmaker from the New York area, has already pleaded not guilty to a 23-count federal indictment accusing him of an array of corruption, including 10 felony counts that prosecutors added in October. "I will continue on my mission to serve my constituents up until I am allowed. I will however NOT be seeking re-election for a second term in 2024," Santos said in a post on social media. "My family deserves better than to be under the gun from the press all the time." His announcement came shortly after the House of Representatives' Ethics Committee released the report concluding Santos' conduct "is beneath the dignity of the office, and has brought severe discredit upon the House." The panel's Republican chairman, Michael Guest, intends to file a motion on Friday to expel him, according to media reports. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-panel-refers-more-unlawful-conduct-by-santos-justice-dept-statement-2023-11-16/ 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwimOdin Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 Will he actually be expelled, though? Will any republican ever have consequences? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 29 minutes ago, SwimOdin said: Will he actually be expelled, though? Will any republican ever have consequences? Short answer: No Long answer: Also no, but with an excusplanation 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted November 16, 2023 Author Share Posted November 16, 2023 The GOP ethics chair plans to move to expel so there's a fair chance at this point. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted November 16, 2023 Author Share Posted November 16, 2023 Quote According to the report, Santos was given an opportunity to submit to investigators a signed written statement responding to the allegations, but he did not do so. Santos also did not respond to the committee’s requests for documents, to voluntarily testify or to provide a statement under oath. Investigators noted that they believed any testimony from Santos “would have low evidentiary value given his admitted practice of embellishment.” The long-awaited report lays out the conclusions of the committee’s months-long investigation in scathing language. According to the committee, investigators compiled more than 170,000 pages of documents and testimony from dozens of witnesses, including financial statements, to reach its conclusions. “Representative Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit. He blatantly stole from his campaign. He deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributions to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit,” the report stated. It continued: “He reported fictitious loans to his political committees to induce donors and party committees to make further contributions to his campaign — and then diverted more campaign money to himself as purported ‘repayments’ of those fictitious loans. He used his connections to high value donors and other political campaigns to obtain additional funds for himself through fraudulent or otherwise questionable business dealings. And he sustained all of this through a constant series of lies to his constituents, donors, and staff about his background and experience.” Some of the more egregious findings were centered on a consulting company called RedStone that was founded by Santos under the guise of being an outside group helping Santos’s election campaign. However, RedStone was not registered with the Federal Election Commission, and documents showed thousands of dollars from RedStone were transferred to one of Santos’s personal checking accounts. The funds were used, among other things, to pay down personal credit card bills, to make a $4,127.80 purchase at luxury brand Hermes, and to make “smaller purchases” at OnlyFans, a subscription site that contains adult content, according to the report. Investigators also zeroed in several expenditures that were paid for with campaign funds that “could not be verified as having a campaign nexus,” the report stated. Those expenditures included $1,500 and $1,400 charges on Santos’s campaign debit card at different spas, both noted as “Botox” in expense spreadsheets. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/11/16/george-santos-ethics-committee-report/ 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonSinger Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 Just gonna leave this here: 1 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 What was the rating? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 Just now, 1pooh4u said: What was the rating? Doesn't matter since it wasn't his anyway. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 8 minutes ago, katt_goddess said: Doesn't matter since it wasn't his anyway. Still though….🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonSinger Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: What was the rating? The way so many people are asking her this. 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted November 16, 2023 Share Posted November 16, 2023 10 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Still though….🤔 Well, it rated 3 sad crying faces on 'X' so I'd say something between Viper's crooked stick and one of those glow-in-the-dark earthworms found only in the deepest trenches of the ocean where the sun doesn't shine. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 8 hours ago, Raptorpat said: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-panel-refers-more-unlawful-conduct-by-santos-justice-dept-statement-2023-11-16/ Or will he? (I'm going to miss this joke format, clearly.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mix Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 Trump/Santos 2024 Maybe not but why not 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenguinBoss Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 6 hours ago, DragonSinger said: Just gonna leave this here: I ain't saying she's lying, but that Twitter thread was full of OF accounts saying he was subbed to them and were clearly just advertising. And that's assuming they were real people and not just bots. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 Her boobs are so huge that in her pic it looks like her head is attached directly to them instead of a neck. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 17 hours ago, katt_goddess said: Well, it rated 3 sad crying faces on 'X' so I'd say something between Viper's crooked stick and one of those glow-in-the-dark earthworms found only in the deepest trenches of the ocean where the sun doesn't shine. See I didn’t get that the crying emojis were crying over Santos’ pingus. Makes sense 😭😭😭= sad pingus 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 13 hours ago, 1pooh4u said: Her boobs are so huge that in her pic it looks like her head is attached directly to them instead of a neck. We should all appreciate her body positivity. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 41 minutes ago, scoobdog said: We should all appreciate her body positivity. I’m sure many among us do and with money even! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.