Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Is saying "If you're a white supremacist, I hope you die of cancer" controversial?


Recommended Posts

Posted

This is just a hypothetical question, of course.

But just wondering, if someone were to say that white supremacists deserve to die slowly and painfully of cancer, would it be controversial or offensive?

I mean, not that anybody should say that, of course.

However, it's entirely within the realm of possibility that someone would believe and say "White supremacists deserve cancer."

What do you think?

Posted
Just now, resurrected said:

I think they should be off the earth sooner rather than later. So, while I can appreciate the painful part, I can't support the slow part. 

Do you think it's wrong for a person to say "I don't care as long as they're gone"?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Athena92 said:

Usually I don't like when people wish bad things on other people

But white supremacists aren't people so they can fuck off

Whoa there pardner

better cool off before the cyber police get involved

Posted
1 minute ago, empty said:

Whoa there pardner

better cool off before the cyber police get involved

I apologize if I hurt the fee-fees of any white supremacists. After all we can all live in peace with white supremacists right

Posted
1 minute ago, empty said:

certain elements of our community bladee blah you get what I mean.

I know a thing or two about collecting warnings while the guilty culprit gets away, simply because they got in over their head and couldn't take the heat from the fire they started, and decided to take a nap on the report button.

Posted
1 minute ago, resurrected said:

I know a thing or two about collecting warnings while the guilty culprit gets away, simply because they got in over their head and couldn't take the heat from the fire they started, and decided to take a nap on the report button.

I have never reported anyone here. Kinda feels nice in a way.

Posted
4 hours ago, tsar4 said:

Yes.  The hidden inference is that they deserve cancer because of the assumption that a person cannot change. 

image.png.f13575e6e92c878aba0f136156afaebd.png

Well....Historically....By a wide margin.....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, tsar4 said:

Yes.  The hidden inference is that they deserve cancer because of the assumption that a person cannot change. 

image.png.f13575e6e92c878aba0f136156afaebd.png

I don't think I've ever seen it, myself.  No idea who that dude is.

Posted

It will be a controversial statement due to simply wishing painful death on anyone but when the group is considered why do people care? These people want a white world, which means killing most of the planet. 

And I have the same argument t against this I always do, Colombian women.

colombian-women.jpg

Posted
13 hours ago, tsar4 said:

Yes.  The hidden inference is that they deserve cancer because of the assumption that a person cannot change. 

image.png.f13575e6e92c878aba0f136156afaebd.png

Caveat: if a person renounces their belief in white supremacy and the inferiority of other races and genders and actively works to right their wrongs, they don't deserve cancer.

But I doubt more than a very select handful of people who aren't true believers would ever do such a thing.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, RainyDayJizz#35 said:

It will be a controversial statement due to simply wishing painful death on anyone but when the group is considered why do people care? These people want a white world, which means killing most of the planet. 

And I have the same argument t against this I always do, Colombian women.

colombian-women.jpg

The ass... the ass is phat. Thank you God.

Assman.jpg.a62130dd3b188e17106c3d5008c7a0ac.jpg

 

Edited by empty
Posted
3 hours ago, empty said:

The ass... the ass is phat. Thank you God.

Assman.jpg.a62130dd3b188e17106c3d5008c7a0ac.jpg

 

Why were we colonized by British instead of the Spanish? It seems like every country they went to the Spanish had sex with the local population until they became a part of it. Sounds much more pleasant than American history.

Posted
12 minutes ago, RainyDayJizz#35 said:

Why were we colonized by British instead of the Spanish? It seems like every country they went to the Spanish had sex with the local population until they became a part of it. Sounds much more pleasant than American history.

Well they colonized Florida....

What I really want to know is why didn't they "conquer" Brazil? The Portuguese? WTF?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Raptorpat said:

The Pope brokered an agreement between Portugal and Spain as to how to carve up South America.

Pope: "Ok, Portugal, you get Brazil. Spain, you get the entire rest of South and Central America."

Spain: "Sounds fair."

Portugal: "Hey wait a fucking minute here..."

Posted

It was actually a line of demarcation dividing "unclaimed" lands across the entire planet, with Spain within rights to control the western hemisphere beyond that line and Portugal within rights to control the eastern hemisphere beyond that line.

However, once the other European powers caught up to the first two powers and started sending out their own fleets, they all ignored the treaty so it didn't have much lasting effect outside of South America.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tordesillas

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, tsar4 said:

The late Sen. Robert Byrd.

Looks nothing like his older self.

Also, he's not known for actions that supported his renouncement of his Klan days, so I wouldn't say he did much more than pay lip service to the changing times.

×
×
  • Create New...