Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Enter The Trump Kakistocracy…

Jman

By Jman
in Current Events

 Share

Recommended Posts

scoobdog Monster Mutant

scoobdog

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

Can he even do that?  If it’s in the constitution he can’t just change it 

He can not.  All he can do is interpret the amendment in a way that assumes the less restrictive interpretation.  Even his cum guzzling SCOTUS sycophants can’t justify that .

  • Like 4
  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Top Gun
Top Gun

If someone starts going around attacking CEOs, so be it. I mean, get over it. 

tsar4
tsar4
naraku360
naraku360

Lol the top comment

Posted Images

1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, tsar4 said:

He can have his minions in Congress present it.  Eventually, at least 38 states would have to ratify it.  Unless, of course, SCOTUS says he has every right to make changes 'cause he's POTUS - but that would create a real problems.

I'm not putting anything past him or his cabal.  He's going to make Nixon look saintly.

Before the states vote to ratify I think they have to vote to even meet to do it. 

  • Like 3
tsar4 Monster Mutant

tsar4

Posted
Posted
Just now, 1pooh4u said:

Before the states vote to ratify I think they have to vote to even meet to do it. 

Yeah, I was skipping some steps.  

But maybe Trump's right?  Hear me out...he gets his wish and after a lengthy process lasting 4 years, he gets his wish and it is ratified the day after his term ends. 

He is immediately deported to Germany by the next administration.

  • Haha 5
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, tsar4 said:

Yeah, I was skipping some steps.  

But maybe Trump's right?  Hear me out...he gets his wish and after a lengthy process lasting 4 years, he gets his wish and it is ratified the day after his term ends. 

He is immediately deported to Germany by the next administration.

But then I have to worry about being deported to Kazigstan and I can’t even spell that 

  • Haha 3
tsar4 Monster Mutant

tsar4

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

But then I have to worry about being deported to Kazigstan and I can’t even spell that 

We'll deport you to Kaukauna, WI. - close enough.

  • Haha 5
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

Nobody tell him. Maybe we can finally get rid of that Civil War holdover crap.

I think it’s a joke account cuz no way is he that stupid 😆

  • Like 2
SwimOdin Legend

SwimOdin

Posted
Posted

He also talked about annexing Mexico. I hate to tell him, then Mexicans in the country illegally would be…legal. They would be deported to…the USA. It’s a 4D chess situation.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Dark_Cloud_Overhead Icon

Dark_Cloud_Overhead

Posted
Posted (edited)

Chris Wray announced he's stepping down as FBI director just before the guy who basically promised to fire him takes office. So much for do not obey in advance. No worries at least about anyone injuring their spines in Washington, since looks as if no one there's got any these days.

Edited by Dark_Cloud_Overhead
  • Like 4
Raptorpat Monster Mutant

Raptorpat

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said:

Mary Trump? A grifter? How exactly? Cuz she broke with the rest of her family a long time ago, and I don't recall her ever of having been accused of any kind of fraud.

I lump her in with the 'resist libs' grifters, those who got popular and then monetized their adjacency to relevance (e.g. the "mueller she wrote" lady). The folks where every other post they make is "[comment about the latest shocking news] and what it means for Trump and Democracy. If you subscribe to my website, you can read my analysis in full."

Unless I'm totally mistaken and she's not charging anyone anything to subscribe to her. But people who use that framing just trigger me, it's literally DJT in reverse.

Dark_Cloud_Overhead Icon

Dark_Cloud_Overhead

Posted
Posted

Where's the grift though? She's not fooling or tricking anyone; she's just sharing her viewpoints. If people want to subscribe or even pay her, or buy her books to read them, that's no different than subscribing to the local newspaper. There's absolutely no grift in any of that.

  • Like 3
Raptorpat Monster Mutant

Raptorpat

Posted
Posted

Maybe grift is a strong word, but I guess I disagree. She was an interesting figure in that she's from the inside and all that background, and it was interesting to hear her viewpoint about him and their ongoing family drama up to a point. Sympathetic figure and the schadenfreude and all that.

But the eventual shift to every tweet just teasing the tip of some story about every twist and turn to hawk of her subscription-based website to read the full thing was such a turn-off. It feels like a very Trumpy turn to take, like proof that they are related.

But I'm also probably overharsh because I kind of resent that whole chronically online "resist lib" ecosphere that I'm lumping her in with.

  • Like 3
scoobdog Monster Mutant

scoobdog

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Raptorpat said:

Maybe grift is a strong word, but I guess I disagree. She was an interesting figure in that she's from the inside and all that background, and it was interesting to hear her viewpoint about him and their ongoing family drama up to a point. Sympathetic figure and the schadenfreude and all that.

But the eventual shift to every tweet just teasing the tip of some story about every twist and turn to hawk of her subscription-based website to read the full thing was such a turn-off. It feels like a very Trumpy turn to take, like proof that they are related.

But I'm also probably overharsh because I kind of resent that whole chronically online "resist lib" ecosphere that I'm lumping her in with.

She isn't a grifter by any metric, but I do get your repulsion to her tactics.  For me, it's always been obvious that she wants to take the Trumps down in revenge for how they destroyed her father and she isn't above dangling carrots to keep us interested.

  • Like 2
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted

Those pardoned Thursday had been convicted of nonviolent crimes such as drug offenses and turned their lives around, White House lawyers said. They include a woman who led emergency response teams during natural disasters; a church deacon who has worked as an addiction counselor and youth counselor; a doctoral student in molecular biosciences; and a decorated military veteran.

 

i want to see every weed slinger, any grower , and caught with x amount of marijuana, pardoned. 

  • Like 4
Insipid Luminary

Insipid

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

Time named Trump “person of the year” and I think that’s disgusting 

It doesn't mean they think he's the best person of the year, just the most influential. Literally Hitler was once person of the year.

  • Like 5
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Insipid said:

It doesn't mean they think he's the best person of the year, just the most influential. Literally Hitler was once person of the year.

It’s fuckin stupid to give people like him that type of attention at all. Idw to hear this fuckin shit for the next eleventy billion years about how he’s “Time’s Person of the Year” because he’s gonna say it’s because he’s so fuckin great.  Just perfect. Four million years of his vomit shit talk

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Insipid Luminary

Insipid

Posted
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

It’s fuckin stupid to give people like him that type of attention at all. Idw to hear this fuckin shit for the next eleventy billion years about how he’s “Time’s Person of the Year” because he’s gonna say it’s because he’s so fuckin great.  Just perfect. Four million years of his vomit shit talk

I think it shows journalistic integrity, something that seems to be undervalued in today's world of highly personalized algorithms and shit. Trump with his megalomania can interpret it however he wants. I do believe he represents the current state of the world, for the worst of course.

Edited by Insipid
  • Like 2
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Insipid said:

I think it shows journalistic integrity, something that seems to be undervalued in today's world of highly personalized algorithms and shit. Trump with his megalomania can interpret it however he wants. I do believe he represents the current state of the world, for the worst of course.

Idk about “journalistic integrity” Marc Benioff the owner is just another billionaire tech bro stroking Trump’s ego for some more tax cuts. 

  • Like 4
scoobdog Monster Mutant

scoobdog

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Insipid said:

It doesn't mean they think he's the best person of the year, just the most influential. Literally Hitler was once person of the year.

We all know why they did it, but that doesn't change the fact that even Hitler didn't crow about being Time's Person of the Year as if it were an achievement.  Making Trump Person of the Year is only going to fuel his erratic behavior rather than offer some kind of insight into the man who we all know too well.

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...