Doom Metal Alchemist

Looking at that pic you just posted, your boobs don't look that small to me. You're probably just comparing yourself to pornstars, lol.

I know the ancient Greeks favored small penises, so I'm sure by extension so did the ancient Romans. If I remember right they also favored small(ish) breasts on women. Wonder how we Americans got so off track.

Your dog saved you from having to eat solid farts, with the (relatively) small inconvenience of having to smell horrible dog farts.

Mattress. I have the complete inability to sleep sitting up.

Nope, that would be British Ghouls. http://www.bnrmetal.com/v5/band/band/BG

I don't know what Nemecyst is supposed to mean, but I love the other three.

Glutton For Pizza.

Soda Pop Symphony.

That sounds more like a magician name.

The Internet Forum Addicts.

The Lonely Virgins.

The Career Students.

The Unemployed Schmucks.

I'm not sure you're understanding what I was getting at. Yeah, that does answer what I asked. But what about the very, very first word used to describe a tree, regardless of language of origin? Like, why did they pick that word?

Goddamn it sponges. I remember when I was little thinking things like, "Why is a tree called a tree? Who came up with that word?"

That's fine, I have no problem with that. I just have a problem with you saying that saying sexual orientation is a social construct equates to homophobia.

I don't know. I'm no expert anyway.

Please don't put words in others' mouths. Like I said, you can say that heterosexuality is just as a made up social construct. If you do not wish to, that's on you. Those that say gays can be "changed" or "fixed" do not believe sexual orientation is just a social construct. They believe nature and biology says men + women, end of discussion. That is not believing sexual orientation is a social construct. You are putting meaning where it doesn't belong.

I'm not talking about men who consider themselves men who like to dress in drag. I mean biological men who say they knew at a young age they were in the wrong bodies because they were more interested in playing with Barbies, wearing pretty pink dresses, etc.

That has absolutely nothing to do with considering sexual orientation a social construct.

How does that not say the same exact thing about heterosexuality?

I don't quite know if I believe that, but I do think there is some truth to it, at least. But this post is going to make me go on a tangent, so bear with me... I think a good deal of transgenderism isn't really valid and is based on social constructs rather than biology. If a transgender person literally feels they have the wrong genitals, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about say, biological men who feel they are women trapped in men's bodies because they want to wear pretty dresses, high heeled shoes, have long flowing hair, love the color pink, etc. Absolutely none of those things are inherently feminine, they are just associated with femininity due to social constructs.

That's tough. It is sometimes pretty easy to identify attractive males, but that just may be knowing what features in a male that females find attractive. On the other side, there have been many males that many females consider extremely attractive, and I'm like, "Really? ok..."

What kind of lawyer would even take this case?

I can't wait until my dad's birthday, so I can emphasize how old he is without having to worry about replies like these.