PhilosipherStoned Posted March 24 Posted March 24 3 hours ago, tsar4 said: I've been seeing this floating around various social media platforms, and it had me thinking "What again?" Nope that shit is clickbait lol. I think it has happened more than once in the last few years though. Once in 2016 and once in 2018. https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/was-donald-trumps-hollywood-star-vandalized-recently-fact-checking-viral-claims-article-119361540 2 1 Quote
Dark_Cloud_Overhead Posted March 24 Posted March 24 The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans Top 4 takeaways from Trump Cabinet's explosive leak of Yemen war plans The incompetence it just never ends. Funny to see Vance spoke out against going through with the operation, but only because of he felt it would be helping out Europe, which he loathes apparently. 7 Quote
Raptorpat Posted March 24 Posted March 24 weird how they loathe Europe but only want white immigrants 8 Quote
SwimOdin Posted March 24 Posted March 24 2 hours ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said: The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans Top 4 takeaways from Trump Cabinet's explosive leak of Yemen war plans The incompetence it just never ends. Funny to see Vance spoke out against going through with the operation, but only because of he felt it would be helping out Europe, which he loathes apparently. This is genuinely terrifying 1 Quote
tsar4 Posted March 24 Posted March 24 2 hours ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said: The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans Top 4 takeaways from Trump Cabinet's explosive leak of Yemen war plans The incompetence it just never ends. Funny to see Vance spoke out against going through with the operation, but only because of he felt it would be helping out Europe, which he loathes apparently. Trump released the following - 2 1 4 Quote
SwimOdin Posted March 24 Posted March 24 Oh definitely, he will claim to not know anything about it, ironically making himself look worse, then when he finds out that makes him look weak, he will double down on that they purposefully sent it to a journalist because they were so confident with the plan that they wanted it to go public. 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 24 Posted March 24 Trump is such a fuckin clown. Not three days after screaming “bIdEn’S eOs r nOt vAlId bEcAuSe….uhh durr aUtOpEn!” He admits to knowing nothing about the 1798 Aliens enemies act he enacted because he didn’t sign it. Honing in a CNN interview then goes on to say “oh no, he meant he didn’t sign the Act in 1798” are they even being serious right now? What kind of crazy fuckin answer is that? https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5208986-cnn-elie-honig-donald-trump-deportation-flight-fight/amp/ 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 Trump strong arming major law firms because they fought against him during his 2020 election shit and the law firm caved. No fight at all. wtf is that bullshit?!? where is MD to tell us how great this is or Wacky to say how “it’s fear mongering” this isn’t a democracy anymore. Not if law firms following the law are going to say they used poor legal practices. That’s bullshit. The firms defending Trump were the ones doing wrong and are doing wrong. So wrong that judges damn near lose their fuckin minds 2 5 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 Love the trick where Hegseth blames the journalist for being added to a chat, probably by Hegseth when he was drunk and tries discrediting all of Goldberg’s work. Mind you, he didn’t release all the texts. Goldberg could have been a scumbag and printed classified information in his story, but he didn’t. I say “could have been a scumbag” because printing all the texts could have dire consequences, especially if they involved strategic information and shit like that. Hegseth should be fired and whatever happened to the “but her emails” crowd? wtf are they now? 6 Quote
Master-Debater131 Posted March 25 Posted March 25 Democrats face gloomy reality as unpopular policies bleed into electoral math https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/3356762/democrats-reality-unpopular-policies-electoral-math-midterm-elections/ "The Democratic Party’s struggle to rebound from bruising losses last year has put it in a vulnerable position ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. It has been nearly four months since Republicans took control of the White House and Senate from Democrats, and the Democratic Party has been unable to rebound. In addition to not putting up a real fight against President Donald Trump’s agenda, the party is bleeding support, and there’s no sign of it stopping. At the end of January, a Quinnipiac University poll had MAGA swaggering as the GOP took its largest-ever advantage over Democrats in favorability ratings. As Democrats shed support, particularly from male and Hispanic voters, another CNN poll earlier this month put the party’s favorability rating at a record low of 29%. As with any party that loses the White House, there’s a period of soul-searching. However, despite caucus retreats meant to get members on the same page and build momentum, every move the party makes seems to dig it deeper into a rut." The Democratic party is historically unpopular, and continues to see its support fall. Young Men are now more conservative than Boomers, and might be the most conservative generation we have seen in decades. Democrats continue to do nothing but insist on blind rage and scream about "Democracy" and "Fascism" to the point that no one is listening. They take the stance of 20% of the electorate in most 80-20 issues, and they show no signs of stopping. The radical left keeps trying to pull the party further and further into the abyss, and moderates are being shouted down or forced from the party. Its pretty fun watching the Democrats collapse like this. Never thought I would see it happen, but it is. Trump truly broke Democrats, and they are going to seriously struggle to make up ground. 1 Quote
discolé monade Posted March 25 Posted March 25 National security experts have voiced alarm that they instead used a publicly available messaging app. In fact, a 2023 Department of Defense memo specifically cited Signal as an example of an "unmanaged" messaging app that is not authorized to transmit non-public DOD information. Democrats in Congress had roundly criticized many of Trump's security and intelligence picks for their perceived lack of experience during the nomination process — and are now calling for further investigation. ~~~ look at them screaming and raging over security now. stupid dems. 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 lol “Michael Waltz is a good man and he’s learned his lesson” DJT on his advisor’s oopsie daisy during a group chat. 2 2 Quote
discolé monade Posted March 25 Posted March 25 32 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: lol “Michael Waltz is a good man and he’s learned his lesson” DJT on his advisor’s oopsie daisy during a group chat. see, this is what is the most distressing. and most correct. you best believe if this had happened on ANY other watch, full page ads to lynch them would be everywhere. and the thing that confuses me the most. the absolute most, is these magatard vets ..... quite literally 'loose lips sinks ships' has been drilled OVER AND OVER (in more convential wording etc) but the bottom line is, this is NOT how military actions of THIS nature are discussed. this administration is doing absolutely everything it can to bring things to a screeching hault, so they can 'reinvison' the democracy. look you fucking turnips...THIS is EXACTLY how great ruling countries fall. the 'lol look at the dems rage' is not at all helpful. not at all. how is this ....all of this: musky musk in your info, trump shitting his pants while x142=2 tells him to stfu at a press conference...on tape. military manuevers/planning on a group chat KNOWN to be hijacked by the russians. this is just so weird. 4 Quote
naraku360 Posted March 25 Posted March 25 33 minutes ago, Master-Debater131 said: Hahahahaha! 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 All of the violations to the Constitution and human rights violations are so fuckin hilarious. Hard working federal employees losing their jobs illegally, and then being belittled by Trump is so hysterical. Mishandling secret information. That’s just comedic gold. Never mind that screeching of “BUT HER EMAILS” is all we heard since 2016. Egg prices are up. Inflation is up. Employment is down but hey, as long as we all have a good laugh. 5 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 (edited) Right on time Edited March 25 by 1pooh4u Removed flashing 3 Quote
discolé monade Posted March 25 Posted March 25 (edited) why does this have to hurt my eyes so? cruel world... ***don't you dare remove the flashing! i'm ok..... i mean the whole thing is horrifyingly horrible, so really fantastic...put the flash back on.... ties the whole meme together. Edited March 25 by discolé monade 3 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 The “but her emails” crowd is busy making memes about how funny it was that they leaked info on an insecure app. Bet any amount of $ they’ll still shout about those emails because all they do is double down on idiocy 2 1 Quote
naraku360 Posted March 25 Posted March 25 8 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: All of the violations to the Constitution and human rights violations are so fuckin hilarious. Hard working federal employees losing their jobs illegally, and then being belittled by Trump is so hysterical. Mishandling secret information. That’s just comedic gold. Never mind that screeching of “BUT HER EMAILS” is all we heard since 2016. Egg prices are up. Inflation is up. Employment is down but hey, as long as we all have a good laugh. MD: 5 Quote
Dark_Cloud_Overhead Posted March 25 Posted March 25 1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said: lol “Michael Waltz is a good man and he’s learned his lesson” DJT on his advisor’s oopsie daisy during a group chat. Seems everyone in the administration is predictably claiming this was perfectly "lawful" and that the chat "did not include classified information". Typical deny, deny, deny strategy. Trump's saying that an "oopsie" was made and that a lesson was actually learned somewhere in all this is so far the only significant admission on anyone's part I've seen that anything at all wrong happened here. Truly... pathetic. As usual, seems he's the only one stepping out of tune with the rest of the "it was a perfect call" choir. On a more serious note, thing that should really worry everyone about this is the fact that they're not even acknowledging there was a problem with any of this means we have every reason to believe they're just gonna keep on doing it, just without including any reporters in the chats -- probably -- in the future. Heaven forbid we ever actually do go to war with China, cuz chances are they'll probably know every move we're about to make before we make it. I was thinking about adding or Russia to that, but who are we kidding thinking that could ever happen with Agent Krasnov running the show. 3 Quote
André Toulon Posted March 25 Posted March 25 34 minutes ago, discolé monade said: why does this have to hurt my eyes so? cruel world... ***don't you dare remove the flashing! i'm ok..... i mean the whole thing is horrifyingly horrible, so really fantastic...put the flash back on.... ties the whole meme together. Well, that shit could cause seizures...ive never seen it happen but i remember sponges saying he blocked a sig because it was gonna make him seize 3 Quote
SwimOdin Posted March 25 Posted March 25 DRACONIAN REPUBLICAN POLICY LEADS TO RETURN OF MIDIEVAL LABOR LAWS Hoo boy I will be now posting a wall of text unrelated to this, but it will be long.It's been four months since daily life shut down, to be replaced by shelter-in-place, distance learning, hoarding for the apocalypse, and trying-to-work from home for a full-time job. Surprisingly, work has been the one thing that has felt the least disrupted since mostly I've been the keep-it-to-yourself-and-get-your-shit-done kind...and distance-working has fit into this anti-social mode just fine. I laugh (on the inside of course) every Friday afternoon at my group's "forced-socialization" sessions -- known to the colleauges as a Virtual Beer Bash; but lately there's been little beer, no bashing to speak of, and we all seem to be going through the motions miserably for thirty minutes pretending to be interested in the personal lives of people we otherwise couldn't care less about outside of work...if not for the Covid thing; heck, if we're lucky, someone might have some ice cream on their end of the Webex or something -- and I wonder if that's what this world is coming to: people seeking out solace in sharing stuff with others. But how meaningful is it really, when the people you socialize with are conveniently the ones you work with, rather than people of your own choosing? And similarly, what happens if due to circumstances beyond your control (*cough*covid*cough*), you have not been in any contact all for four months with those who previously brightened your days, one small innocous-transactional ping at a time? Video conferencing does a great job standing in for scheduled meetings and such; but not such a good job replicating the spontaneous unplanned interpersonal interactions that provide variety to an otherwise banal existence we call "the daily grind." Sad, really. 6 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 1 hour ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said: Seems everyone in the administration is predictably claiming this was perfectly "lawful" and that the chat "did not include classified information". Typical deny, deny, deny strategy. Trump's saying that an "oopsie" was made and that a lesson was actually learned somewhere in all this is so far the only significant admission on anyone's part I've seen that anything at all wrong happened here. Truly... pathetic. As usual, seems he's the only one stepping out of tune with the rest of the "it was a perfect call" choir. On a more serious note, thing that should really worry everyone about this is the fact that they're not even acknowledging there was a problem with any of this means we have every reason to believe they're just gonna keep on doing it, just without including any reporters in the chats -- probably -- in the future. Heaven forbid we ever actually do go to war with China, cuz chances are they'll probably know every move we're about to make before we make it. I was thinking about adding or Russia to that, but who are we kidding thinking that could ever happen with Agent Krasnov running the show. They’re doing the deny deny deny bullshit cuz Jeffrey Goldberg has, but won’t release, the receipts. He knew what time the bombs were gonna start falling and everything I wonder if JG was put in on the chat on purpose because of how they were communicating. They’re so cowardly that it’s believable that they would be a whistleblower but hide behind incompetence 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 Just the other day Hegseth was lying his ass off about the reason Musk was meeting with him at the Pentagon. A source suggested that Musk was going to, or did, receive information pertaining to China or some shit. Hegseth totally denied it. It was a perfect “getting to know you, welcome aboard” meeting where they all just sat around and double fisted shots while snorting lines of ketamine 2 Quote
André Toulon Posted March 25 Posted March 25 I can only speak anecdotally about the child labor thing, but are we going to "force" them to fill these roles and just accept subpar quality, because you cant get a current teenager to flip burgers, muxh less pick fucking oranges or wetf they do in Florida. And while on the surface, its annoying.... logically, these kids aren't conditioned for those jobs anymore. They are definitely better trained for content creation and online scams...cant imagine how that happened🙄. Point being, these kids dont know how to do shit that the guys you deported can do. 5 2 Quote
Dark_Cloud_Overhead Posted March 25 Posted March 25 7 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: They’re doing the deny deny deny bullshit cuz Jeffrey Goldberg has, but won’t release, the receipts. He knew what time the bombs we’re gonna start falling and everything I wonder if JG was put in on the chat on purpose because of how they were communicating. They’re so cowardly that it’s believable that they would be a whistleblower but hide behind incompetence I really doubt that he was in any way in on this if that's what you're saying. I'm not really sure what you're suggesting exactly. I'm a little confused by what you're trying to say there honestly. I will say I've wondered if they're claiming none of this was classified why he doesn't just release those parts then and prove them wrong, but I think it's partially his journalistic integrity of not wanting to do what he already said he wouldn't go doing. Also, regardless of what they claim it could still hurt national security and he could probably still get in legal trouble if he were to divulge stuff like that. Another thing is that there was a CIA operative's name supposedly shared on the chat. Releasing something like that would definitely impact that person's safety and career, so I get why he's choosing to sit on some stuff. 2 Quote
scoobdog Posted March 25 Posted March 25 1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said: Right on time Bring the flashing back! I want to scare the douchbags in my office. 5 Quote
naraku360 Posted March 25 Posted March 25 4 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Bring the flashing back! I want to scare the douchbags in my office. Make America Have Seizures Again! 4 Quote
scoobdog Posted March 25 Posted March 25 11 minutes ago, naraku360 said: Make America Have Seizures Again! The look and my aunt's and cousin's faces will be so worth it... for the few moments before I black out. They're already trying to spin the Slack scandal in the weirdest possible way possible. 4 Quote
discolé monade Posted March 25 Posted March 25 41 minutes ago, André Toulon said: Well, that shit could cause seizures...ive never seen it happen but i remember sponges saying he blocked a sig because it was gonna make him seize oh..i know. and it does for me, now. but i know how to scroll on by. 1 1 Quote
discolé monade Posted March 25 Posted March 25 17 minutes ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said: I really doubt that he was in any way in on this if that's what you're saying. I'm not really sure what you're suggesting exactly. I'm a little confused by what you're trying to say there honestly. I will say I've wondered if they're claiming none of this was classified why he doesn't just release those parts then and prove them wrong, but I think it's partially his journalistic integrity of not wanting to do what he already said he wouldn't go doing. Also, regardless of what they claim it could still hurt national security and he could probably still get in legal trouble if he were to divulge stuff like that. Another thing is that there was a CIA operative's name supposedly shared on the chat. Releasing something like that would definitely impact that person's safety and career, so I get why he's choosing to sit on some stuff. she's saying that all that cock and not one of them has the balls to do the right thing...so they'll have someone else be the whipping boy. military bullshit big boy wanna be's. weren't they both national guard? 3 Quote
Dark_Cloud_Overhead Posted March 25 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, discolé monade said: she's saying that all that cock and not one of them has the balls to do the right thing...so they'll have someone else be the whipping boy. military bullshit big boy wanna be's. weren't they both national guard? Ahhh, okay I think I understand now. I was puzzled by the including him on purpose part, but I see what she meant. That someone else on the call wanted to leak what was taking place and added the reporter to do it. Thing is we know exactly who it was that added him. Mike Waltz. So I mean, really hard to believe he'd do that cuz if anybody's gonna take the heat for this it's him. Pretty ineffective way of letting someone else be the whipping boy. Guess nothing's that unbelievable at this point though. 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 34 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Bring the flashing back! I want to scare the douchbags in my office. Spoiler 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted March 25 Posted March 25 37 minutes ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said: I really doubt that he was in any way in on this if that's what you're saying. I'm not really sure what you're suggesting exactly. I'm a little confused by what you're trying to say there honestly. I will say I've wondered if they're claiming none of this was classified why he doesn't just release those parts then and prove them wrong, but I think it's partially his journalistic integrity of not wanting to do what he already said he wouldn't go doing. Also, regardless of what they claim it could still hurt national security and he could probably still get in legal trouble if he were to divulge stuff like that. Another thing is that there was a CIA operative's name supposedly shared on the chat. Releasing something like that would definitely impact that person's safety and career, so I get why he's choosing to sit on some stuff. I didn’t say Goldberg was aware or in on it. Only that someone could have added him on purpose to witness the irresponsible shit they’re doing. 3 Quote
naraku360 Posted March 25 Posted March 25 7 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Reveal hidden contents That's barely even flashing! Spoiler I certainly don't see any titties.... 5 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.