Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Rogue_Alphonse said:

Good thing I am above you and can just revoke it.

Funny joke you got here, and while it's clearly ridiculous i would still prefer it if you didn't inaccurately describe the staff hierarchy, we wouldn't want to confuse the userbase. I'm not going to formally warn you over it, but for all intensive purposes consider this basically that. Thanks, and happy posting!

  • Thanks 1
  • D'oh 1
Posted
14 hours ago, NaBrunswick said:

Funny joke you got here, and while it's clearly ridiculous i would still prefer it if you didn't inaccurately describe the staff hierarchy, we wouldn't want to confuse the userbase. I'm not going to formally warn you over it, but for all intensive purposes consider this basically that. Thanks, and happy posting!

The shadow council supports you Nabs.  We can't have the dignity of the office debased by mere jokes!

Posted
16 hours ago, NaBrunswick said:

Funny joke you got here, and while it's clearly ridiculous i would still prefer it if you didn't inaccurately describe the staff hierarchy, we wouldn't want to confuse the userbase. I'm not going to formally warn you over it, but for all intensive purposes consider this basically that. Thanks, and happy posting!

Funny joke you got here, and while it's clearly ridiculous i would still prefer it if you didn't inaccurately describe the staff hierarchy, we wouldn't want to confuse the userbase. I'm not going to formally warn you over it, but for all intensive purposes consider this basically that. Thanks, and happy posting!

Posted
31 minutes ago, Rogue_Alphonse said:

Funny joke you got here, and while it's clearly ridiculous i would still prefer it if you didn't inaccurately describe the staff hierarchy, we wouldn't want to confuse the userbase. I'm not going to formally warn you over it, but for all intensive purposes consider this basically that. Thanks, and happy posting!

"Intents and purposes." That's what you meant. (Everything else is spot on.)

Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, Rogue_Alphonse said:

 but for all intensive purposes 

Holy FUCK rogue, please tell me you did not seriously just say this lololol

Someone come help this poor fool!

Edited by NaBrunswick
Before he gets banned again
Posted
1 hour ago, Sir Teddybar Gut Fullung said:

"Intents and purposes." That's what you meant. (Everything else is spot on.)

Hey, I just quoted what Nabiscuit said.

18 hours ago, NaBrunswick said:

Funny joke you got here, and while it's clearly ridiculous i would still prefer it if you didn't inaccurately describe the staff hierarchy, we wouldn't want to confuse the userbase. I'm not going to formally warn you over it, but for all intensive purposes consider this basically that. Thanks, and happy posting!

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Rogue_Alphonse said:

Want more spam? ;)

 

Image result for more spam gif

I DON'T LIKE SPAM! >:( And scrapple looks like meat-vomit. 

Fun fact, I watched Flying Circus when I was like 5 because my mom thought everything on PBS was educational. o.O Yeah...

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

I DON'T LIKE SPAM! >:( And scrapple looks like meat-vomit. 

Fun fact, I watched Flying Circus when I was like 5 because my mom thought everything on PBS was educational. o.O Yeah...

This explains a lot. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, katt_goddess said:

I DON'T LIKE SPAM! >:( And scrapple looks like meat-vomit. 

Fun fact, I watched Flying Circus when I was like 5 because my mom thought everything on PBS was educational. o.O Yeah...

I think I just gleaned waaay more insight out of this than I should’ve. 

×
×
  • Create New...