ghostrek Posted yesterday at 12:58 AM Posted yesterday at 12:58 AM https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2025-08-28/internet-forum-4chan-sues-uk-regulator-in-us-over-free-speech What would happen if it went to the Supreme Court Quote
The_annoying_one Posted yesterday at 01:09 AM Posted yesterday at 01:09 AM I didn’t know 4chan was even still a thing. 4 Quote
ghostrek Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM Author Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM @Insipid @scoobdog @Raptorpat Quote
ghostrek Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM Author Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM Just now, ghostrek said: @Insipid @scoobdog @Raptorpat your opinon Quote
Raptorpat Posted yesterday at 01:31 AM Posted yesterday at 01:31 AM Who has jurisdiction, when a website crosses state and national borders by simply existing on the open internet, is a serious question worth answering. 2 1 Quote
PhilosipherStoned Posted yesterday at 01:37 AM Posted yesterday at 01:37 AM (edited) 24 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: Who has jurisdiction, when a website crosses state and national borders by simply existing on the open internet, is a serious question worth answering. The whole situation has EU content creators ready to jump ship, and everybody else in other countries waiting to see how things play out expecting their respective countries to follow suite if weakening end to end encryption can really be a thing we do to "protect the children". I've stayed pretty true to my promise of not messing with ghostrek threads until now, but at least he's getting better at selecting viral topics. https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/the-online-safety-act-isnt-just-about-age-verification-end-to-end-encryption-is-also-at-risk Edited yesterday at 01:56 AM by PhilosipherStoned attaching a tech break down involving OSA and E2EE Quote
mthor Posted yesterday at 02:36 AM Posted yesterday at 02:36 AM It's not just 4chan. They're suing in conjunction with Lolcow LLC (Kiwi Farms). There's a thread in the Lolcow & Lolcow, LLP subforum if anybody is interested. (Don't worry, @scoobdog, it's in Lolcow Meta, not the Thunderdome.) 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted yesterday at 03:59 AM Posted yesterday at 03:59 AM Couldn’t they just shut servers in the UK(or wtf they’d have to do to not be accessible there anymore) Like fuck it. How many people is that really? Quote
mthor Posted yesterday at 04:06 AM Posted yesterday at 04:06 AM 5 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Couldn’t they just shut servers in the UK(or wtf they’d have to do to not be accessible there anymore) Like fuck it. How many people is that really? I don't know about 4chan, but there are a lot of Brits on the farms. 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 3 hours ago, ghostrek said: your opinon My opinion is I ain’t putting in my email to read that article… 2 hours ago, mthor said: It's not just 4chan. They're suing in conjunction with Lolcow LLC (Kiwi Farms). There's a thread in the Lolcow & Lolcow, LLP subforum if anybody is interested. (Don't worry, @scoobdog, it's in Lolcow Meta, not the Thunderdome.) But I only go to Thunderdome. 1 3 Quote
ghostrek Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 7 hours ago, Raptorpat said: Who has jurisdiction, when a website crosses state and national borders by simply existing on the open internet, is a serious question worth answering. @Raptorpat simple, the fucking UN Quote
ghostrek Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 19 minutes ago, [classic swim] said: Ok Johnny Sack @[classic swim] who? Quote
1pooh4u Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 12 hours ago, mthor said: I don't know about 4chan, but there are a lot of Brits on the farms. They only have a population of 69m how much of a loss would it really be when the potential loss for staying could be worse. Besides even if it’s too many to give up, people are resourceful. They’ll get on w a VPN 1 Quote
lupin_bebop Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago How is that going to work? It’s an international website. All the UK could do is shut off the UK servers. Them taking any sort of action has implications well beyond “keeping children safe”. Free speech, and all. Yes, there is a level of censorship that is needed/necessary, but there’s a line between it and surveillance. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.