Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted

When the purchasing power of the dollar depreciates because of the direct impact of tariffs…the tariffs are affecting you. I don’t think you’re ready for an economics lesson, but just know that even when you buy something that wasn’t taxed, you’re still getting fucked. 
 

And this is all because one buffoon is choosing for it to happen.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Don seems to be the guy rooting for the release of Epstein's documents as well as other documents, such as the pilot's flight manifests.

No he isn't. He's STALLING while pretending to be in favor of it because there are still enough stupid people out there who will believe he's all for it. He isn't because if all the files were released, his name would be top of the list on every list. 

The 'attempt' to release the grand jury testimony would have been a nothing burger because it would merely by transcripts of the actions of Epstein and wouldn't contain any information about anyone on a list. And that attempt has mysteriously failed anyway. 

You are defending a convicted sexual predator and child rapist with a massive sundowning issue, dude. That's who you are defending. :| 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I found out what Dokorochan was by googling his sig on asmb. 

It was an anime that started innocent enough, but the main plot line is a kid grows up to create a pedo paradise where girls dont age past 13.

Packard has no issue with the sexualization of children. This is canon.

Posted
14 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

I found out what Dokorochan was by googling his sig on asmb. 

It was an anime that started innocent enough, but the main plot line is a kid grows up to create a pedo paradise where girls dont age past 13.

Packard has no issue with the sexualization of children. This is canon.

Not to defend Packard here (*throws up in mouth a bit*), but that series is an absurdist dark comedy that doesn't take that premise remotely seriously. It's just a vague background excuse for the protagonist to be repeatedly violently murdered and resurrected.

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, Top Gun said:

Not to defend Packard here (*throws up in mouth a bit*), but that series is an absurdist dark comedy that doesn't take that premise remotely seriously. It's just a vague background excuse for the protagonist to be repeatedly violently murdered and resurrected.

I'm going to take your word for it because I dont want it in my history, but the yt comments back then informed me there's a bikini episode and I jumped ship. 

Explaining the satirical relevance of age ambiguous loli to anyone who might see my history just isn't on my top 10 list of shit to do

Edited by André Toulon
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, katt_goddess said:

No he isn't. He's STALLING while pretending to be in favor of it because there are still enough stupid people out there who will believe he's all for it. He isn't because if all the files were released, his name would be top of the list on every list. 

The 'attempt' to release the grand jury testimony would have been a nothing burger because it would merely by transcripts of the actions of Epstein and wouldn't contain any information about anyone on a list. And that attempt has mysteriously failed anyway. 

You are defending a convicted sexual predator and child rapist with a massive sundowning issue, dude. That's who you are defending. :| 

Where and when did I defend Epstein?

  • D'oh 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

So, how did this jump from Jean Caroll to any kids?

Well, the derail started right about here

13 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

If Trump is actually guilty of anything, let's hear it.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

He wasn't on trial for any of that.

......so just derail it some more, i guess....sure, why not. The beef train has left the station long ago.

Edited by André Toulon
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, mthor said:

People tend to humor the intellectually feeble. Did he pat your head and give you a lollipop, too?

It's no different from any other watch.  If I bring in this Seiko, anybody who knows his watches better than I do can open it, look at serial numbers, movement numbers and the overall workmanship to see whether it's real or fake and since I'm not offering it for resale, he has zero motive to give me the wrong information.

Seiko.jpg

Edited by The Evil Dr. Longshadow
  • Haha 1
Posted

I cant make this up

10 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Then, just start buying stuff made in America.

 

5 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

It's no different from any other watch.  If I bring in this Seiko, anybody who knows his wstches better than I do can open it, look at serial numbers, movement numbers and the overall workmanship to see whether it's real or fake and since I'm not offering it for resale, he has zero motive to give me the wrong information.

Seiko.jpg

 

  • Haha 4
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

I cant make this up

 

 

I'm telling somebody how to avoid the tariff when he doesn't want to pay it.

Me?  I can buy any import made and brought here before the tariff took effect.

Or, I can buy American products.

Options.

Edited by The Evil Dr. Longshadow
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

If Trump is actually guilty of anything, let's hear it.

Sigh.

Sexual assault (multiple counts)
Fraud (multiple counts)
Insider trading (expunged due to business being defunct)
Embezzelment
Wage theft
Securities fraud
Money laundering

These were all under a single RICO case.

Before your brain overheats trying to ask the question: RICO is an acronym:

Racketeering
In a
Criminal
Organization

Edited by lupin_bebop
  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, lupin_bebop said:

Sigh.

Sexual assault (multiple counts)
Fraud (multiple counts)
Insider trading (expunged due to business being defunct)
Embezzelment
Wage theft
Securities fraud
Money laundering

These were all under a single RICO case.

Let's take securities fraud:  He wanted to use his Mari Lago estate as collateral for a bank loan.  The estate is in fact worth one billion dollars, according to several real estate experts who were very conveniently not permitted to testify to that.  The judge opted instead to take testimony from somebody with zero experience in real estate who claimed that Mari Lago is only worth eighteen million dollars.  Fact:  You can't buy a one acre dirt lot in that neighborhood for eighteen million dollars.  

It was on that false testimony that the verdict of fraud was reached.

Posted
5 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Does the stain on the dress match any of Don's output?  A guilty man has no reason or motive to offer a sample output.

There was no semen found, which is why he was found liable of sexual assault and not rape. You can at least inform yourself a little bit on what you're trying to argue and not look like a disingenuous dope.

Also, an innocent man wouldn't refuse a sample for three years.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, PenguinBoss said:

There was no semen found, which is why he was found liable of sexual assault and not rape. You can at least inform yourself a little bit on what you're trying to argue and not look like a disingenuous dope.

Also, an innocent man wouldn't refuse a sample for three years.

There are other things that can leave DNA.

Posted

Starting a meme coin while president when Carter had to sell his peanut farm. Saying there's no Epstein files, then saying it's a Democrat hoax, then talking to a convicted sex trafficker.

Huh, but there's nothing to see here, folks!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

There are other things that can leave DNA.

Outside of blood, it's the only thing that'd leave a stain, though.

And that still doesn't explain why he never gave DNA for three years. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Who was he supposed to give it to three yesrs earlier?  He did eventually offer it up.

 

Who was he offering it to? The same people asking for it. Don't ask dumb questions like you caught me on something.

Yeah, and it took him over three years and after discovery was over to do it. I'm sure there was no ulterior motive to it. Relax, guy.

  • Like 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

Who was he offering it to? The same people asking for it. Don't ask dumb questions like you caught me on something.

Yeah, and it took him over three years and after discovery was over to do it. I'm sure there was no ulterior motive to it. Relax, guy.

Aaaaaaannd WHO was asking for it, way bsck then?

Posted
19 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

You're too dense to be coy. Just say what you want so I can slap it down in your face again.

You don't give that to just anybody.

Anyway... this wasn't even a criminal trial.  It was a civil trial where the acuser didn't need any evidence, she just had to convincingly smear and slander the defendant enough to make the half wits in the jury believe it all.

  • D'oh 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...