The_annoying_one Posted Sunday at 02:57 AM Posted Sunday at 02:57 AM 1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Then, just start buying stuff made in America. I can all but guarantee you that whatever device you’re using to flood these boards wasn’t made in your version of America. 2 1 Quote
SwimOdin Posted Sunday at 03:02 AM Posted Sunday at 03:02 AM When the purchasing power of the dollar depreciates because of the direct impact of tariffs…the tariffs are affecting you. I don’t think you’re ready for an economics lesson, but just know that even when you buy something that wasn’t taxed, you’re still getting fucked. And this is all because one buffoon is choosing for it to happen. 3 1 Quote
stilgar Posted Sunday at 03:07 AM Posted Sunday at 03:07 AM Hey, remember when this thread hadn't been derailed by packard and it was about how much he hates China? 1 1 Quote
katt_goddess Posted Sunday at 04:17 AM Posted Sunday at 04:17 AM 1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Don seems to be the guy rooting for the release of Epstein's documents as well as other documents, such as the pilot's flight manifests. No he isn't. He's STALLING while pretending to be in favor of it because there are still enough stupid people out there who will believe he's all for it. He isn't because if all the files were released, his name would be top of the list on every list. The 'attempt' to release the grand jury testimony would have been a nothing burger because it would merely by transcripts of the actions of Epstein and wouldn't contain any information about anyone on a list. And that attempt has mysteriously failed anyway. You are defending a convicted sexual predator and child rapist with a massive sundowning issue, dude. That's who you are defending. 1 1 Quote
stilgar Posted Sunday at 05:27 AM Posted Sunday at 05:27 AM I thought this thread was gonna be about another toaster oven pork chop. 6 Quote
naraku360 Posted Sunday at 06:25 AM Posted Sunday at 06:25 AM Hey, remember when Packard started simping for pedophiles? Oh, right. That's current. My bad. 1 1 1 Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 07:00 AM Posted Sunday at 07:00 AM I found out what Dokorochan was by googling his sig on asmb. It was an anime that started innocent enough, but the main plot line is a kid grows up to create a pedo paradise where girls dont age past 13. Packard has no issue with the sexualization of children. This is canon. Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 07:04 AM Posted Sunday at 07:04 AM 1 hour ago, stilgar said: I thought this thread was gonna be about another toaster oven pork chop. We were all disappointed and are just making the best of it 1 4 Quote
Top Gun Posted Sunday at 07:20 AM Posted Sunday at 07:20 AM 14 minutes ago, André Toulon said: I found out what Dokorochan was by googling his sig on asmb. It was an anime that started innocent enough, but the main plot line is a kid grows up to create a pedo paradise where girls dont age past 13. Packard has no issue with the sexualization of children. This is canon. Not to defend Packard here (*throws up in mouth a bit*), but that series is an absurdist dark comedy that doesn't take that premise remotely seriously. It's just a vague background excuse for the protagonist to be repeatedly violently murdered and resurrected. Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 08:05 AM Posted Sunday at 08:05 AM (edited) 44 minutes ago, Top Gun said: Not to defend Packard here (*throws up in mouth a bit*), but that series is an absurdist dark comedy that doesn't take that premise remotely seriously. It's just a vague background excuse for the protagonist to be repeatedly violently murdered and resurrected. I'm going to take your word for it because I dont want it in my history, but the yt comments back then informed me there's a bikini episode and I jumped ship. Explaining the satirical relevance of age ambiguous loli to anyone who might see my history just isn't on my top 10 list of shit to do Edited Sunday at 08:05 AM by André Toulon 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 10:33 AM Author Posted Sunday at 10:33 AM 7 hours ago, The_annoying_one said: I can all but guarantee you that whatever device you’re using to flood these boards wasn’t made in your version of America. Lol... in b4 the tarrifs... 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 10:35 AM Author Posted Sunday at 10:35 AM 6 hours ago, katt_goddess said: No he isn't. He's STALLING while pretending to be in favor of it because there are still enough stupid people out there who will believe he's all for it. He isn't because if all the files were released, his name would be top of the list on every list. The 'attempt' to release the grand jury testimony would have been a nothing burger because it would merely by transcripts of the actions of Epstein and wouldn't contain any information about anyone on a list. And that attempt has mysteriously failed anyway. You are defending a convicted sexual predator and child rapist with a massive sundowning issue, dude. That's who you are defending. Where and when did I defend Epstein? 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 10:42 AM Author Posted Sunday at 10:42 AM 7 hours ago, naraku360 said: Packard, look at what you're saying. What are you defending IF you're wrong? Like, how do you know for sure that he's not guilty? Does the stain on the dress match any of Don's output? A guilty man has no reason or motive to offer a sample output. Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 10:45 AM Author Posted Sunday at 10:45 AM 8 hours ago, naraku360 said: Someone is really desperate to defend a pedo with a teeny tiny penis. So, how did this jump from Jean Caroll to any kids? Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 11:08 AM Posted Sunday at 11:08 AM 22 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: So, how did this jump from Jean Caroll to any kids? Well, the derail started right about here 13 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: If Trump is actually guilty of anything, let's hear it. 1 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 11:13 AM Author Posted Sunday at 11:13 AM 3 minutes ago, André Toulon said: Well, the derail started right about here He wasn't on trial for any of that. Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 11:18 AM Posted Sunday at 11:18 AM (edited) 5 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: He wasn't on trial for any of that. ......so just derail it some more, i guess....sure, why not. The beef train has left the station long ago. Edited Sunday at 11:19 AM by André Toulon 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 11:21 AM Author Posted Sunday at 11:21 AM (edited) 11 hours ago, mthor said: People tend to humor the intellectually feeble. Did he pat your head and give you a lollipop, too? It's no different from any other watch. If I bring in this Seiko, anybody who knows his watches better than I do can open it, look at serial numbers, movement numbers and the overall workmanship to see whether it's real or fake and since I'm not offering it for resale, he has zero motive to give me the wrong information. Edited Sunday at 11:31 AM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow 1 Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 11:26 AM Posted Sunday at 11:26 AM I cant make this up 10 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Then, just start buying stuff made in America. 5 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: It's no different from any other watch. If I bring in this Seiko, anybody who knows his wstches better than I do can open it, look at serial numbers, movement numbers and the overall workmanship to see whether it's real or fake and since I'm not offering it for resale, he has zero motive to give me the wrong information. 4 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 11:30 AM Author Posted Sunday at 11:30 AM (edited) 5 minutes ago, André Toulon said: I cant make this up I'm telling somebody how to avoid the tariff when he doesn't want to pay it. Me? I can buy any import made and brought here before the tariff took effect. Or, I can buy American products. Options. Edited Sunday at 11:32 AM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow 3 Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 11:42 AM Posted Sunday at 11:42 AM 🤡👟👞🥿 Its amazing how far he'll go...even retroactively purchase shit, to convince himself tariffs are an everyone but him problem. Nice edit 💩🍔 2 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 11:57 AM Author Posted Sunday at 11:57 AM 13 minutes ago, André Toulon said: 🤡👟👞🥿 Its amazing how far he'll go...even retroactively purchase shit, to convince himself tariffs are an everyone but him problem. Nice edit 💩🍔 So, how did I get away without paying any? Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 12:06 PM Posted Sunday at 12:06 PM 8 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: So, how did I get away without paying any? You didn't....but i do like how you reference it like any criminal would 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 12:08 PM Author Posted Sunday at 12:08 PM Just now, André Toulon said: You didn't....but i do like how you reference it like any criminal would How is buying second hand stuff criminal? 1 Quote
André Toulon Posted Sunday at 12:39 PM Posted Sunday at 12:39 PM 30 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: How is buying second hand stuff criminal? I didnt say that. Reply in good faith or fuck off. Dont make me take another thread from you 1 Quote
lupin_bebop Posted Sunday at 04:04 PM Posted Sunday at 04:04 PM On 7/25/2025 at 6:43 PM, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Grass is too expensive. The cellulose fiber given to cattle is extracted from saw dust, not grass, lettuce or cabbage. Citation needed. 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 04:08 PM Author Posted Sunday at 04:08 PM 2 minutes ago, lupin_bebop said: Citation needed. That was already done. 1 Quote
lupin_bebop Posted Sunday at 04:11 PM Posted Sunday at 04:11 PM (edited) 18 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: If Trump is actually guilty of anything, let's hear it. Sigh. Sexual assault (multiple counts) Fraud (multiple counts) Insider trading (expunged due to business being defunct) Embezzelment Wage theft Securities fraud Money laundering These were all under a single RICO case. Before your brain overheats trying to ask the question: RICO is an acronym: Racketeering In a Criminal Organization Edited Sunday at 04:13 PM by lupin_bebop 2 Quote
lupin_bebop Posted Sunday at 04:14 PM Posted Sunday at 04:14 PM 6 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: That was already done. No. It wasn’t. I checked before I even responded. So, again……Citation needed. 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 04:20 PM Author Posted Sunday at 04:20 PM 2 minutes ago, lupin_bebop said: Sigh. Sexual assault (multiple counts) Fraud (multiple counts) Insider trading (expunged due to business being defunct) Embezzelment Wage theft Securities fraud Money laundering These were all under a single RICO case. Let's take securities fraud: He wanted to use his Mari Lago estate as collateral for a bank loan. The estate is in fact worth one billion dollars, according to several real estate experts who were very conveniently not permitted to testify to that. The judge opted instead to take testimony from somebody with zero experience in real estate who claimed that Mari Lago is only worth eighteen million dollars. Fact: You can't buy a one acre dirt lot in that neighborhood for eighteen million dollars. It was on that false testimony that the verdict of fraud was reached. Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 04:21 PM Author Posted Sunday at 04:21 PM 5 minutes ago, lupin_bebop said: No. It wasn’t. I checked before I even responded. So, again……Citation needed. Then, you didn't look thoroughly enough. Quote
PenguinBoss Posted Sunday at 04:21 PM Posted Sunday at 04:21 PM 5 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Does the stain on the dress match any of Don's output? A guilty man has no reason or motive to offer a sample output. There was no semen found, which is why he was found liable of sexual assault and not rape. You can at least inform yourself a little bit on what you're trying to argue and not look like a disingenuous dope. Also, an innocent man wouldn't refuse a sample for three years. 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 04:23 PM Author Posted Sunday at 04:23 PM 1 minute ago, PenguinBoss said: There was no semen found, which is why he was found liable of sexual assault and not rape. You can at least inform yourself a little bit on what you're trying to argue and not look like a disingenuous dope. Also, an innocent man wouldn't refuse a sample for three years. There are other things that can leave DNA. Quote
naraku360 Posted Sunday at 05:23 PM Posted Sunday at 05:23 PM 59 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: There are other things that can leave DNA. It's like he thinks forensics is actually like in what he saw on CSI. 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 05:43 PM Author Posted Sunday at 05:43 PM 17 minutes ago, naraku360 said: It's like he thinks forensics is actually like in what he saw on CSI. The True Crimes Network has better scripts. It's all based in fact. Fact: Semen is not the only substance that contains DNA. Quote
[classic swim] Posted Sunday at 05:45 PM Posted Sunday at 05:45 PM You typed that shit with a full load in your mouth. 3 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 05:46 PM Author Posted Sunday at 05:46 PM Just now, [classic swim] said: You typed that shit with a full load in your mouth. I do brew the best cup of coffee on the east coast. Quote
1pooh4u Posted Sunday at 06:15 PM Posted Sunday at 06:15 PM ITT Packard defends an adjudicated sexual abuser 2 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 06:24 PM Author Posted Sunday at 06:24 PM 8 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: ITT Packard defends an adjudicated sexual abuser Because he was railroaded, not tried. There's difference. Learn it. 2 Quote
Insipid Posted Sunday at 06:35 PM Posted Sunday at 06:35 PM Starting a meme coin while president when Carter had to sell his peanut farm. Saying there's no Epstein files, then saying it's a Democrat hoax, then talking to a convicted sex trafficker. Huh, but there's nothing to see here, folks! 3 1 Quote
PenguinBoss Posted Sunday at 06:41 PM Posted Sunday at 06:41 PM 2 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: There are other things that can leave DNA. Outside of blood, it's the only thing that'd leave a stain, though. And that still doesn't explain why he never gave DNA for three years. 1 Quote
naraku360 Posted Sunday at 07:02 PM Posted Sunday at 07:02 PM 37 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Because he was railroaded, not tried. There's difference. Learn it. Protesting a bit much? 2 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 07:13 PM Author Posted Sunday at 07:13 PM 28 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said: Outside of blood, it's the only thing that'd leave a stain, though. And that still doesn't explain why he never gave DNA for three years. Who was he supposed to give it to three yesrs earlier? He did eventually offer it up. Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 07:14 PM Author Posted Sunday at 07:14 PM 11 minutes ago, naraku360 said: Protesting a bit much? That's not how the phrase works. 1 Quote
naraku360 Posted Sunday at 07:23 PM Posted Sunday at 07:23 PM 8 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: That's not how the phrase works. Prove it 2 Quote
PenguinBoss Posted Sunday at 07:23 PM Posted Sunday at 07:23 PM 6 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Who was he supposed to give it to three yesrs earlier? He did eventually offer it up. Who was he offering it to? The same people asking for it. Don't ask dumb questions like you caught me on something. Yeah, and it took him over three years and after discovery was over to do it. I'm sure there was no ulterior motive to it. Relax, guy. 2 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 08:10 PM Author Posted Sunday at 08:10 PM 46 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said: Who was he offering it to? The same people asking for it. Don't ask dumb questions like you caught me on something. Yeah, and it took him over three years and after discovery was over to do it. I'm sure there was no ulterior motive to it. Relax, guy. Aaaaaaannd WHO was asking for it, way bsck then? Quote
PenguinBoss Posted Sunday at 08:27 PM Posted Sunday at 08:27 PM 15 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Aaaaaaannd WHO was asking for it, way bsck then? You're too dense to be coy. Just say what you want so I can slap it down in your face again. 2 Quote
naraku360 Posted Sunday at 08:41 PM Posted Sunday at 08:41 PM 28 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Aaaaaaannd WHO was asking for it, way bsck then? You. While thinking about Trump's "stain." 2 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted Sunday at 08:51 PM Author Posted Sunday at 08:51 PM 19 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said: You're too dense to be coy. Just say what you want so I can slap it down in your face again. You don't give that to just anybody. Anyway... this wasn't even a criminal trial. It was a civil trial where the acuser didn't need any evidence, she just had to convincingly smear and slander the defendant enough to make the half wits in the jury believe it all. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.