scoobdog

Wow, I wasn't expecting symptoms that bad.

Hey Nabs, maybe you should log off and log back on to see if the DF returns.

I don't know if that's being senile or if it's just the confusing nature of modern healthcare billing. Of course, I spend my days dealing with subcontractors that have no fucking clue what they're doing when they try to bill; half the shit they send in doesn't even match their own proposals.

At this point, I'm pretty sure even Gen X is beginning to show signs of cognitive decline.

Eh. I might, though.

Because I gave him a racist pass. I got a lot of power, man.

Dude's a racist and a pussy. Sucks when you find out what your favorite celebrity is like.

Go fuck yourself! Wait, I think I phrased that wrong...

Poor snek

Can I use your password? Let you use my Disney +…

I imagine any time Pantera is playing in your head it’s scary.

It is not true.

I had to look up who was even in the band. Interestingly, one brother got shot up in Columbus, OH, which seems about right.

The fuck? Wait, I could have been giving Doom shit about hair metal.

More Chillwave from Washed Out

Did you use your fingers?

Wrong thread dipshit.

Careful. Dude is a known rapist.

The dude seems more interesting than his anticlimactic death would indicate.

This leads to an interesting predicament.... If the latest decision is held up in this form, does that mean lower courts get to choose which interpretation they want?

That is such an INCEL way to go out... dying of a heart attack after falling on top of some chick you took home and getting a trickle of tributes indistinguishable from mockery by internet comedians.

Speaking of which... https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/06/politics/clarence-thomas-stare-decisis-roe-v-wade-leak/index.html Dude is really an idiot.

Are you going to be his new Twitter social media coordinator? I hear the job pays like shit, but it's perfect if you're already a self hating tool.

It completely runs counter to the notion of precedent.... the entire reason the fucking court even exists. Alito is essentially pretending that the last nearly 50 years of precedent should never have happened. It's shockingly bad. Obviously the reason Roberts is so concerned by the leak is that it shows a fundamental lack of understanding about not just previous decisions but of the process itself, all by one of the most senior members of the court and just weeks after the other most senior member of the court compromised himself through his idiot dick coozy (among other things). It effectively amounts to him nitpicking the previous rulings (Roe and Casey) so as to invalidate them rather than use them as a foundation for a revised ruling. The fact that he his essentially parroting the GOP talking point of Roe being wrong as opposed to filling in gaps of the previous ruling is what is most concerning.