scoobdog

Oh.... it's not just from that.

I'd care more if you wrote all of that in Japanese, then told us how much more awesome Japan is.

.. ever.

We’ve had to manage expectations to get enjoyment out of them.

Of course she would get a tattoo of a tittle skittle.

I see we’re playing Google Translate in here.

I wonder how many fake leftists will vote for Kari.... like they did for Trump.

It's a Chihuahua... what the hell isn't wrong with it?

"Best" in the sense that he was the one most likely to benefit from low turnout. His quality is by no means better despite the fact he's been less vocal than Masters about the usual Trumpian conspiracies.

Let's also not forget that throwing money at Adam fucking Laxalt was also a losing proposition. He might not know this, but Laxalt is a perennial loser in Nevada in part because of his poor showing amongst Latino voters. You don't "win" by boosting a candidate that isn't going to carry a growing and important demographic. I mean, a freshman poli-sci student could tell you that.

Pretty much all of the characters seem to suck more except for Norville, and that's because Shaggy was already generally speaking the worst.

I think that's more Matt Getz' dog than Kevin McCarthy's dog

I suppose that's subject to interpretation. If it's not, then you wasted two pages arguing nothing.

Dude... who do you think you're talking to? We of the esteemed DDR don't just embrace trolling, we wallow in it. Plus, Sorce generally spikes on cow fucker at every opportunity, so I can't very well ask her not to pass up on it.

Only exception, for completely unscientific reasons, is that there's not replacing 7-Up when you're sick with a cold.

I don't think that's the dog he was referring to, but it'll do.

So, we disagree. There you go.

Right? Well, I revise my stance to agree somewhat that optics do matter but not as a direct qualifier. Interesting opinion piece in the LA Times showed up today: How optics appear has more to do with how much distance certain people can put between themselves and uncomfortable political situations. There was never a situation where Garland was going to charge Trump just for mishandling documents, and it had nothing to do with optics and everything to do with a highly complex prosecution for little to no judicial benefit. Trump's true menace has always been his ability to manipulate others, and, rightly, that's should be the focus of any investigation including the documents one. Still, Merrick has always had to contend with Democrats who equally feel the need to go after Trump in any way possible and have the expectation that any investigation end in some kind of official judicial response. The fact he is separating himself from the investigation into the Biden documents almost assuredly indicates that optics plays a role specifically in how the public sees partisan interference in official proceedings. MD isn't right in saying the optics are relevant directly to decisions, but she is right that it impacts how the decision making process is impacted by contributing choices.

Only worthwhile thing cow fucker has ever done in his entire life.

Sponges isn’t as articulate.

The part where you apparently don’t get that I think it is the best way to handle them?

What about emotions?

Backed to covered wagons and copious ox farts.

You’re not really doing it for your own sake either. You get nothing out of civility other than making them not bother you.