PenguinBoss

I'm no construction expert, but if the wood wasn't load-bearing, and if it is predominantly concrete and steel I don't know why it would be, it would make sense to me that it would be removed first. So, how do we know it wasn't removed from the building and taken elsewhere before you took the picture?

Are you pretending that you don't do that? All you provide is cherry picked or anecdotal evidence, then try to justify it by claiming anything contradictory is somehow invalid. Then when that doesn't work, you ignore the posts that give evidence altogether. I mean, your dumb ass thinks cigarette smoke doesn't have a smell. Literally no one has ever agreed with you on that, but somehow you still think you're right. That's why you're a joke.

Because people don't converse with the help.

It's a bold play to point out that you actively ignore evidence that proves you wrong.

Your entire argument is "Humans do it, so aliens must." You don't know that. You can't know that. Period.

And which otherworldly examples are you familiar with, exactly? Or did that security guard also explain the extraterrestrials' economics?

Congrats on falling just short of being banned for racism. And speaking of Hispanic people, Happy B-day to my boy @RedemptionZeni

The strategy is to make the other person think you have dementia?

What's your point? That your nicotine-addled brain can't keep up? Or that you're somehow owed the right to call someone whatever you want without consequence?

Oh, you mean like "fake news" and "alternative facts" right?

What does this have to do with my question? I genuinely don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Because you enjoy fondly looking back to a time when women stayed in the kitchen and black people couldn't vote? I honestly don't know why else you'd keep a 65 year old book that changes every year. It's as outdated as you and your way of thinking are.

So you can't be bothered to name the ones that came to mind. Maybe because you're making it up.

Wait, weren't you IT?

Oh? Would you care to name some examples? I'm sure some sprung to mind when you typed this.

Are you referring to last year when no one went anywhere and there was no demand for gas? Regardless, your claim is that it's going up, almost immediately, because Biden cancelled the pipeline. It only stands the reason that Trump approving it would make it go down, also almost immediately, which it did not.

Maybe too much tar has coated your brain, so you aren't understanding, but I'll try. Your assertion is that Biden cancelling the expansion is the cause of rising gas/oil prices. According to you, apparently the only cause. My assertion is that if that were true, Trump's approval would have inversely caused gas/oil price to immediately plummet and stay there until Biden eventually cancelled it. It didn't and therefore your assertion is incorrect. It's bullshit, just like claiming it was pointless to cancel a pipeline that would damage the communities it would run through for an energy source that is on the way out, anyway.

I know it's not who you're implying, because otherwise the price would have dropped off a cliff and stayed there when Trump approved it.

The people filling plastic bags and Tupperware full of it thereby creating an artificial shortage?

No, I don't have enough of a presence to warrant it. Or the people that would do it realize they wouldn't get much of a reaction.

Maybe you could categorize your files, if some such witchcraft existed, that is.

Let us know when you upgrade to moving pictures.

Welcome to the early-mid 2000s, grandpa.

Oh god, you're going to have labeled USB sticks for different genres/artists, aren't you?

Your laptop only having space for 3-4 hours of music is the most believable thing in this thread.

*90% of money raised will go to pay for Trump's legal defense