Jump to content
Upcoming Downtime Saturday possibly - Security Patch Update ×
UnevenEdge

wacky1980

SwimIcon
  • Posts

    9549
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by wacky1980

  1. 160 probably won't be a big issue. i mean, it's not fda compliant, but it's pretty close, and you're not cooking in a restaurant so you can do what you want. maybe you need to consider changing your food prep and cooking techniques to keep the chicken more moist. might make all the difference.
  2. yeah, jeez. fugg is a prescription drug whore. huge fucking difference.
  3. don't know why for sure, but when i read this post, i automatically assumed it was fuggs that posted it. i was actually surprised she'd given up on the ruse so easily.
  4. canadian bacon and sauerkraut pls
  5. oh oh wait i got one. you can't just run over a baby duck and be fine about it.
  6. run. run fast.
  7. i do want to mention one exception to my last point. some merchants may be able to process checks (not ach) in real-time on a particular bank if they conduct what's called "merchant capture" transactions for that institution. i'll go ahead and guarantee you though, some fucking guy using his phone for mobile deposit, doesn't possess such capability.
  8. look up the term "preauthorization". it's a thing nearly every debit / eft transaction does (with the exception of some recurring and offline/stand-in tx), and it's done in real-time. it's also the reason your debit card gets declined for insufficient funds at the point of sale. have you ever handed a merchant a check and they took a picture of it and said "sorry, there's not enough funds in this account to process the transaction." has that ever happened? the answer is no, because it's not fucking possible to perform ach transactions in real-time. so unless you're handing people imaginary checks from your miaginary paypal account and they're processing them with their imaginary check posting machines, you're not getting "within the hour" postings from a written check. not. fucking. possible.
  9. if this place were irl, half the users wouldn't even exist (alts), and the other half would have been sent up to the mental impound ages ago. even with an empty room though, you'd still be here with all your friends, poor zeni.
  10. i hate to break it to ya bob, but ach transactions are not faster than eft/debit. nowhere, near as fast, really. as a matter of fact, there's new ach regulations going into effect next month that ramp up the availability of same-day ach debit transactions. that means within a few hours, ach debits can hit your account, if you conduct the tx at the correct time of day and the vendor/merchant participates in same-day ach. however, ach transactions do not post (and won't for the foreseeable future) in real-time. not only do debit transactions post (preauthorizations) in real-time, but they even check available balance prior to posting the preauth. conclusion? you're full of shit. i know, i'm surprised as hell too.
  11. i hope for his sake that i am. but i really don't think that's the case.
  12. you're not supposed to pull the copper out of your walls when you get foreclosed, just sayin'. also, it's easier (and faster!) to just melt/burn the insulators off. just don't do it upwind of a police station. so you have silver dollars (peace? morgan?) with mint errors, eh? die cracks, or what?
  13. silver ikes? for $200 apiece? surely not. or are we talking foreign silver? it takes about 150 copper cents (us pre-1983 or canadian pre-1997) to make a pound. you might get $2 for that copper on the scrap market, probably less. congrats, that 80lbs of copper you've saved might possibly net you up to $40 after cost of face value is deducted. but you'll probably only break even, if that. saving copper only makes sense if you plan to sit on it until the chinese suck it all up and drive the cost up about 10x. which is not likely to happen anytime soon.
  14. while i'm being that guy... what 1970's silver coins appraised at $3500? is it ten pounds of proofs or something? foreign coins perhaps?
  15. like i said, i don't want to tell you you're wrong. maybe i'm wrong, and i've just never happened across any documentation for that series of bank notes. but it's something i would be really interested to see proof on, whenever you're done plugging the delaware with your giant hog of course.
  16. i hate to tell you you're wrong (nobody likes to be told they're wrong, esp when it comes to collectibles) but from everything i've ever read or researched, there's never been a series 1929 gold certificate issued by this country. i'm really hoping your memory is just wrong, that you have 1928 gold certs or 1929 "brown seal" frbn's, because those are both collectible and valuable. 1929 gold certificates are most likely counterfeits.
  17. what's this certificate, like a cert of authenticity or something? gold certificates are standard bank notes issued by the treasury. they're printed with gold ink overlay and say something like "$xxx in gold coin payable to the bearer on demand" across the bottom.
  18. for the record: 1928 $100 gold cert 1929 $100 frbn
  19. that's more believable. fifty $100 gold certs in sequential, ungraded raw/uncirculated condition, would probably be worth $25-50k as a set. possibly more, depending on serial. and whatever the market demand is, i don't know right now because i haven't really followed it lately. but they've gotta be 1928's though, or 1929 frn (not gold cert).
  20. are you thinking 1928 by chance? 1929 is just...impossible, not just spectacularly improbable, but impossible.
  21. right, didn't think in that direction. i have some granite that was blown off the side of the crazy horse monument.
  22. anyways, pics pls.
  23. i don't believe you. sitting on $500k in cash bills that are possibly worth 5-10x face value? nope, don't believe it. that many sequentials (one would also assume mint condition/treasury strapped) would be documented somewhere. then there's that whole bit about 1929 not being a series year in which $100 gold certs were actually printed. 1928 would be possible, but i'm still suspicious that there's that many sequential bills that aren't documented as a collection.
  24. my oldest verified possession is probably a dime from 1851. i have other coins that are older, but they're so worn that it's impossible to verify the exact year they were minted. one of them is an 183x date. so that's probably the oldest thing i have.
  25. She's not a member. Playing Outlast, getting skeered of every little thing. I keep tapping on the window to try and make her piss herself. Oh the lols.
×
×
  • Create New...