tsar4 Posted April 2 Author Posted April 2 How soon before Trump says, "They cheated, those weren't the cards I dealt them!"? 2 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 2 Posted April 2 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Jman said: This despite Elon spending $25 million on it. I wonder How they will try to contest this and somehow give it to Schimel anyway? Edited April 2 by 1pooh4u 2 Quote
Raptorpat Posted April 2 Posted April 2 They're still contesting the NC court seat that the Dem incumbent won in November 4 Quote
Dark_Cloud_Overhead Posted April 2 Posted April 2 18 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: I wonder How they will try to contest this and somehow give it to Schimel anyway? Crawford's spoke just now and mentioned Schimel called her and conceded, so don't think they'll be able to contest this one. It doesn't look like it's gonna be close enough for them to have any kind of case to challenge it legally. Don't think they have any more real cards to play then. Maybe if they still had a supermajority in the state legislature they could try something crazy, but they lost that in the last election. 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 2 Posted April 2 11 minutes ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said: Crawford's spoke just now and mentioned Schimel called her and conceded, so don't think they'll be able to contest this one. It doesn't look like it's gonna be close enough for them to have any kind of case to challenge it legally. Don't think they have any more real cards to play then. Maybe if they still had a supermajority in the state legislature they could try something crazy, but they lost that in the last election. Damn shame though that my first thought was “how do they inject crazy into this?” because that’s all that’s been happening these last, what feels like, a hundred years 🫠 “when are the bat shit tweets and bleets from X and Truth Social gonna start?” Was my second thought 🫠😆🫠 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 2 Posted April 2 1 hour ago, Raptorpat said: They're still contesting the NC court seat that the Dem incumbent won in November They just hardly ever lose graciously anymore. I think it’s because shit is tilted in their favor so much they can’t understand when they lose. 2 Quote
Seight Posted April 2 Posted April 2 6 hours ago, 1pooh4u said: They just hardly ever lose graciously anymore. I think it’s because shit is tilted in their favor so much they can’t understand when they lose. I mean they don't even accept perceived losses, of course they don't know what to do when they actually do lose. 4 Quote
discolé monade Posted April 2 Posted April 2 lmao , phony stark. dead. the irony is thick with this one. in charge of finding gov. waste, lulz 3 Quote
Raptorpat Posted April 2 Posted April 2 they are kind of leaning in on the voter ID passing and ignoring that they bombed out in the race https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-reacts-susan-crawford-winning-wisconsin-supreme-court-election-brad-schimel-2053978 4 Quote
Raptorpat Posted April 2 Posted April 2 Mallory McMorrow running for US Senate in Michigan. She went viral in 2022 responding to a Republican calling her a groomer, and she was important in helping flip the MI Senate to Dem control in the 2022 elections. 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 2 Posted April 2 11 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: Mallory McMorrow running for US Senate in Michigan. She went viral in 2022 responding to a Republican calling her a groomer, and she was important in helping flip the MI Senate to Dem control in the 2022 elections. Why did they call her a groomer because she’s transgender? 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 2 Posted April 2 Fuckin disgusting people. Every accusation is a confession. Those who accuse her loudest probably got a hard drive fully of kiddie porn 4 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 2 Posted April 2 36 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: they are kind of leaning in on the voter ID passing and ignoring that they bombed out in the race https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-reacts-susan-crawford-winning-wisconsin-supreme-court-election-brad-schimel-2053978 It’s stupid to lean in on that. WI already had voter ID laws anyway. That’s probably why it won. 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 2 Posted April 2 22 minutes ago, Insipid said: Looks like the entire state shifted more to the Dems I still don’t believe that Trump legit took all 7 swing states. 1 1 Quote
Raptorpat Posted April 2 Posted April 2 It was the global covid eco penalty combined with the biden-too-old. Just enough people stayed home. 4 Quote
katt_goddess Posted April 3 Posted April 3 9 hours ago, 1pooh4u said: It’s stupid to lean in on that. WI already had voter ID laws anyway. That’s probably why it won. Pretty much this. All it did was put into the state constitution something that had been in action without any issues for like 10 years. This is the equivalent of voting that yes, water is wet. 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 4 Posted April 4 But the FL races were fine? WI was fine in Nov of 2024 though, right?!? GUYS, CMON ALREADY! GET NEW PLAYS IN YOUR PLAYBOOK 5 Quote
Insipid Posted April 4 Posted April 4 18 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: But the FL races were fine? WI was fine in Nov of 2024 though, right?!? GUYS, CMON ALREADY! GET NEW PLAYS IN YOUR PLAYBOOK I mean the Republican opponent officially conceded and dismissed rigging . . . so that's something, I guess. 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 4 Posted April 4 19 minutes ago, Insipid said: I mean the Republican opponent officially conceded and dismissed rigging . . . so that's something, I guess. Absolutely it’s just so tiring and old to keep saying “it’s rigged” every time they lose. With them every accusation is really a confession. Makes me think every election Trump participated in was rigged. That’s why he’s still insisting he won in 2020. 4 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 5 Posted April 5 A lot of people showed up for the empty chair town hall. Place was overflowing 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted April 5 Posted April 5 Fuckin MalliNOtakis knew that the town hall was happening. She chose to go to a little league game and hand children an award for some presidential essay contest. She’s a coward 2 4 Quote
discolé monade Posted April 9 Posted April 9 he's perfect In 2015, Paxton was indicted on state securities fraud charges relating to activities prior to taking office; he has pleaded not guilty. In March 2024, prosecutors agreed to drop the securities fraud charges against him under the terms of a pretrial agreement. In October 2020, several high-level assistants in Paxton's office accused him of "bribery, abuse of office and other crimes."[11][12] In May 2023 Paxton was impeached by the Texas House of Representatives by a vote of 121–23, leading to his suspension.[13] The articles of impeachment included allegations that Paxton gave preferential treatment to a political donor who bribed him, misapplied public resources and made false statements against whistleblowers, obstructed justice in the securities fraud trial against him, and made false statements regarding his financial interests.[17] In September 2023, the Texas Senate voted 16–14 to acquit Paxton of all articles of impeachment, ending his suspension from office.[18][19] Paxton is separately being investigated by federal prosecutors for the same legal issues on coinciding federal statutes.[20] 3 Quote
Raptorpat Posted April 9 Posted April 9 iirc he ran a scorched earth campaign against any elected or judge or DA who worked on his case or the impeachment, and he got a few knocked out in their primaries 2 Quote
_lost_username_ Posted April 9 Posted April 9 2 hours ago, discolé monade said: he's perfect In 2015, Paxton was indicted on state securities fraud charges relating to activities prior to taking office; he has pleaded not guilty. In March 2024, prosecutors agreed to drop the securities fraud charges against him under the terms of a pretrial agreement. In October 2020, several high-level assistants in Paxton's office accused him of "bribery, abuse of office and other crimes."[11][12] In May 2023 Paxton was impeached by the Texas House of Representatives by a vote of 121–23, leading to his suspension.[13] The articles of impeachment included allegations that Paxton gave preferential treatment to a political donor who bribed him, misapplied public resources and made false statements against whistleblowers, obstructed justice in the securities fraud trial against him, and made false statements regarding his financial interests.[17] In September 2023, the Texas Senate voted 16–14 to acquit Paxton of all articles of impeachment, ending his suspension from office.[18][19] Paxton is separately being investigated by federal prosecutors for the same legal issues on coinciding federal statutes.[20] I remember in 2008 when Joe Horn shot and killed two fleeing unarmed burglars who were no threat to him and got off scott free. At the time, I knew a veteran guy who moved from Missouri to Texas for college. When it happened, he said he wasn't totally surprised after living there for less than a year. Of Texas he said "people are a special kind of mean down here" when it came to the character of people thought the moral option was killing two guys instead of just letting them run away with a TV. When I hear of pieces of shit like Abbot and Paxton, I think back to that moment because it pretty much what really led me to think of Texans as on a level of badness that no other state was even close to ... until Florida started making a name for itself over similar shit less than a decade later. 3 Quote
Raptorpat Posted April 17 Posted April 17 Everyone in the NY is anxious of Lawler: he's won twice in a blue congressional district in Westchester/Rockland because he always shows up and he's somehow carved out a moderate persona. Stefanik would thoroughly nationalize the race in a way Lawler has a path to avoid, and her district is the North Country so the only thing she is known for beyond that is her abrupt pivot to Trump sycophancy. I welcome her to the race. 2 Quote
scoobdog Posted April 17 Posted April 17 2 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: Everyone in the NY is anxious of Lawler: he's won twice in a blue congressional district in Westchester/Rockland because he always shows up and he's somehow carved out a moderate persona. Stefanik would thoroughly nationalize the race in a way Lawler has a path to avoid, and her district is the North Country so the only thing she is known for beyond that is her abrupt pivot to Trump sycophancy. I welcome her to the race. SO, at the very least, she provides static for the GOP primary. I should add: if this isn't a naked attempt to threaten Johnson into giving her back leadership, I'll eat my hat. Quote
Raptorpat Posted Wednesday at 07:57 PM Posted Wednesday at 07:57 PM another incumbent retiring 2 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.