Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, tsar4 said:

In some cases, a number of votes was reached, and that seemed to trigger a big shift toward red from that point on.

In some cases, a time of day was reached, and that seemed to trigger a big shift toward red from that point on. 

It appears that these things happened in specific precincts in swing states with some other areas in the same swing state to a lesser extent - perhaps to make it appear to be happening across the board.

Titus on the above: Well, you couldn't do that, you'd need some really rich guy to pay some hackers to mess with machines.

2020 election had more mail-in votes due to covid.  It is much harder to fix mail-in votes. Someone whining that the election was "rigged" because of all the mail-in votes...I wonder who?

I am not going to peer into this rabbit hole any longer

😆 tinfoil hats give me headaches. Not even kidding. 🫠

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said:

I am not going to peer into this rabbit hole any longer

😆 tinfoil hats give me headaches. Not even kidding. 🫠

Do you need a tinfoil hat if the statistical data shows that these precinct election results have a very bizarre anomaly compared to every other previous election in every precinct (bell curves, with a "Russian tail"...just like in sudden shifts in late votes toward Putin in Russian elections)?  Looking at the mail-in votes, Kamala was a shoe-in, if the pattern carried over to the in-person votes...and it seems to look that way with early returns.  Then a time or a threshold was reached and red starts taking over.

https://electiontruthalliance.org/pennsylvania-part-2  Take a look about halfway down the page, Allegheny county mail-in with election day voting right below it.  If you were to trace a curve over the mail-in, it would look like a normal bell curve.  The election day shifts late & isn't a normal curve.

Posted
3 hours ago, tsar4 said:

So after watching this, I didn't start thinking immediately of the last election, but the previous one.  Trump telling the Georgia Governor, find me 11,000 votes.  I thought it was because that was only what he needed to win, but what if it was because he knew that that SPECIFIC amount of ballots actually existed and if so how would he know?

 

That is a long podcast and its nail biting the whole way through.

Posted
2 hours ago, tsar4 said:

In some cases, a number of votes was reached, and that seemed to trigger a big shift toward red from that point on.

In some cases, a time of day was reached, and that seemed to trigger a big shift toward red from that point on. 

It appears that these things happened in specific precincts in swing states with some other areas in the same swing state to a lesser extent - perhaps to make it appear to be happening across the board.

Titus on the above: Well, you couldn't do that, you'd need some really rich guy to pay some hackers to mess with machines.

2020 election had more mail-in votes due to covid.  It is much harder to fix mail-in votes. Someone whining that the election was "rigged" because of all the mail-in votes...I wonder who?

I got about 40 minutes in.  The implication is that there an anomalies and they're all centered on the computer tabulation itself.  There is no indication that there was actual ballot stuffing or deliberate destruction of physical votes but the data shows that there are abnormal count patterns that would warrant cross checking the count with the actual paper ballots (of which even electronic ballot boxes have).

I particularly liked the Philadelphia example.  The city still went to Harris, but the count at the end of the day shows an inconsistently large number of Trump votes.  This might happen in a situation where a hacked computer "stuffs" the ballot with enough Trump votes to affect his overall popularity in the state but not enough to set off warnings about an obviously blue metropolitan region going red.

I'll have to watch more when I have more time.  Just suggesting there's an algorithm out there is a bombshell, but coming up with such an algorithm is extremely complicated and well beyond Elon Musk's capabilities as a second rate coder with self -aggrandizement  issues. For this to work, there has to be a real conspiratorial organization behind it.   Just seeing the anomaly is only a start and it might not go where we think it will.

  • Like 1
Posted

All of those anomalies are irrelevant and do nothing but drive people insane. Even if without a doubt the election was stolen, nothing will change.  We been there and done something similar in 2000 with the hanging chad. SCOTUS said basically “Bush probably didn’t win but there’s nothing we can do about it now” 

 

we don’t even have to go down rabbit holes when the election was stolen right in front of our faces through voter roll purges and mail in ballot invalidation. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

It should also be pointed out that the instructions for proper dress attire explicitly stated BLACK suits and BLACK ties for the men.

I'm colorblind and even I know that's not black.

“They can’t tell me how to dress!” -Trump, probably 

remember when Obama got dragged for wearing a tan suit? He wasn’t even at a funeral and they went on and on and on about it 

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

lol our POTUS crashing off methamphetamines for the world to see should’ve been on my BINGO card but it wasn’t 

he looks like a big ol fuckin grape working on becoming a raisin 

Edited by 1pooh4u
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

“They can’t tell me how to dress!” -Trump, probably 

remember when Obama got dragged for wearing a tan suit? He wasn’t even at a funeral and they went on and on and on about it 

Pepperidge Farm remembers. Faux Noise spent WEEKS crying about that. 

  • Like 4
Posted

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doge-cuts-cost-135-billion-analysis-elon-musk-department-of-government-efficiency/

" The $135 billion cost to taxpayers doesn't include the expense of defending multiple lawsuits challenging DOGE's actions, nor the impact of estimated lost tax collections due to staff cuts at the IRS. "

"The IRS, which is planning on cutting roughly 40% of its workforce, could forego $323 billion in tax revenue over the next decade due to lower tax compliance and a decline in audits, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab."

So yeah, shocker, the doggie doo doo department is the waste, and it's looking like one awfully big turd being laid on all of us.

  • Like 6
Posted
2 hours ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doge-cuts-cost-135-billion-analysis-elon-musk-department-of-government-efficiency/

" The $135 billion cost to taxpayers doesn't include the expense of defending multiple lawsuits challenging DOGE's actions, nor the impact of estimated lost tax collections due to staff cuts at the IRS. "

"The IRS, which is planning on cutting roughly 40% of its workforce, could forego $323 billion in tax revenue over the next decade due to lower tax compliance and a decline in audits, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab."

So yeah, shocker, the doggie doo doo department is the waste, and it's looking like one awfully big turd being laid on all of us.

I think we all saw that coming. That DOGE would cost more than the $ they’d supposedly save us 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SwimOdin said:

What the fuck does Trump have on Lindsey Graham? That man would happily perform a rusty trombone on POTUShit

The world's worst kept secret - that he's gayer than tinsel at Christmas time. 

Either that or that his penis was actually jerry-rigged from a toe and some old bits of skin. 

  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, Dark_Cloud_Overhead said:

 

She’s a fuckin idiot “Durr Orange Sky Daddy just saved 75% of the American population” -Pam Bondi

RFKJ “Great! Now we can end the federal narcan distribution program so they can all start dying again!”

https://www.vox.com/public-health/411089/us-drug-overdose-deaths-fentanyl-narcan-rfk
 

Trump and RFKJ also want to shut down treatment centers.  That will certainly reduce crime. No one has ever in their life heard of desperate drug addicts robbing people for their fix.  So no worries, right? 🙃

  • Like 5
Posted

I did a w&b cuz I work from home today and I was wondering….do you think Trump believes he really looks buff like Sly Stallone in Rambo because Trump has an abnormal amount of photos with his head on way buffer bodies. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Raptorpat said:

 

This clown was allegedly the one who created the infamous chat group that leaked sensitive information.

Granted, when the administration is a circus, one clown doesn’t make a lot of difference.

Edited by Jman
  • Like 5
Posted
5 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

I did a w&b cuz I work from home today and I was wondering….do you think Trump believes he really looks buff like Sly Stallone in Rambo because Trump has an abnormal amount of photos with his head on way buffer bodies. 

pics. let's see'm!
SHOW EM IF YA GOT EM!!

  • Haha 4
Posted

Much sexy definitely Trump and not photoshop or AI at all.


Filter?!?  What’s a filter?  I never heard of her, but that’s ok!-Trump on ABC

  • Haha 5
Posted
3 minutes ago, Raptorpat said:

 

It will be interesting to see just how low she'll go to suck up to a man who has taken every possible turn to debase her.  Not that I don't revel in her misery, mind you - it's just that there has to be a point where she can't put up with it anymore and still maintain enough dignity in front of her House colleagues.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Raptorpat said:

I don't think she or any of them could ever admit it

I don’t think so either.  This is the problem with being “in on the con” as it were - her path to power is based on one big lie.  Either she admits to the lie and is blocked from a path forward, or the lie is exposed and her party loses power, leaving her on the outside anyway.  The latter option will always be more palatable because it’s worth the risk of outlasting Trump and having his corpse to blame instead of owning up to her own culpability in his irrational behavior.  The few GOP lawmakers who understood the threat, like Adam Kinzinger or Liz Chaney, are already out and have a path forward.

  • Like 5
Posted
7 hours ago, Raptorpat said:

 

Everything is a raging dumpster fire floating down a river of sewar water but there is that one very tiny shiny bit of light in it all.

We have a Scaramucci measurement system for shithead employment now. :D 

  • Haha 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...