🍬Candy🍬 Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 Huh? I don't understand Why do the roles need to be reversed for him to be a furry?
PhilosipherStoned Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 Fuggs brings up a good point I guess. Isn't he kind of a Fursona either way?
SwimModSponges Posted September 11, 2019 Author Posted September 11, 2019 (edited) I don't know, i suppose maybe because the male takes a more active role in courting? Or because the male puts a lot of his motivation behind physical attraction? Like, if beast wanted to take belle to pound town... well yeah, she's hot, and learned to love beast because of the person inside. A prince getting all hot and bothered by a lady beast, i think folks would assume he's down with the fur? Maybe even motivated by it? Edited September 11, 2019 by SwimModSponges
André Toulon Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 18 minutes ago, SwimModSponges said: Change my mind. no 2
SwimModSponges Posted September 11, 2019 Author Posted September 11, 2019 Like, are you agreeing or do you not consider it debate worthy?
PhilosipherStoned Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 Oh ok the prince is no longer even the beast. I didn't know you were including the fur in the role reversal.
Doom Metal Alchemist Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 The princess would a beast-ess, as in ugly, not a hot anthropomorphic creature. Therefore, the prince would probably not be interested.
PhilosipherStoned Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 (edited) Still not convinced. Belle is a furry by definition isn't she? She was down with the fur before they were even sure the curse would be reversed. So either way the one bangin' the beast is a furry. Edited September 11, 2019 by PhilosipherStoned
SwimModSponges Posted September 11, 2019 Author Posted September 11, 2019 7 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said: The princess would a beast-ess, as in ugly, not a hot anthropomorphic creature. Therefore, the prince would probably not be interested. But if he was interested, what would you assume about him? 6 minutes ago, PhilosipherStoned said: Still not convinced. Belle is a furry by definition isn't she? She was down with the fur before they were even sure the curse would be reversed. So either way the one bangin' the beast is a furry. Belle falls for the prince because of the person inside because women are (broadly speaking) less invested in the physical attraction in a mate than men.
🍬Candy🍬 Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 So if belle were the beast? Men would fuck anything..there would be no story..no romance
Doom Metal Alchemist Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, SwimModSponges said: But if he was interested, what would you assume about him? He's into bestiality. 1
PhilosipherStoned Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, SwimModSponges said: But if he was interested, what would you assume about him? Belle falls for the prince because of the person inside because women are (broadly speaking) less invested in the physical attraction in a mate than men. She was able to overlook the fur either way. Are you really going to tell me that in that kind of setting. 16th century weddings bascially forced sex after marriage to consumate the marriage.. meaning she was willing to get down with that fur... Hell she probably thought of it as a bonus. She's a furry. Edited September 11, 2019 by PhilosipherStoned
SwimModSponges Posted September 11, 2019 Author Posted September 11, 2019 35 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said: He's into bestiality. This guy gets it.
helpme Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 I would watch it Even it was a porn parody
SwimModSponges Posted September 11, 2019 Author Posted September 11, 2019 Well I mean yeah, but still.
André Toulon Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 1 hour ago, SwimModSponges said: Like, are you agreeing or do you not consider it debate worthy? I kinda forgot....My attention is elsewhere....I'll try to get back on track soon.
Poof Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 I thought you had to have a fursona and want to be an animal to be a furry. Bestiality =/= furry necessarily? Is this right? Like she's a furry ally or a furry lover right? 2
SwimModSponges Posted September 11, 2019 Author Posted September 11, 2019 You know, you may be right. In any case, you probably wouldn't want to leave the prince alone in a room with a dog and a jar of peanut butter. 1
Chapinator_X Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 (edited) Counter argument: Belle was Down-to-Yiff, and if it were a contemporary story, she’d be reading furry m/m slash fiction on Deviantart on the library computers at the beginning of the movie. ”Sonic/Shadow: Secret Lovers!? But you’ve read that one twice!” Edited September 11, 2019 by imchapp.in 1 1 1
Doom Metal Alchemist Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 22 hours ago, Poof said: I thought you had to have a fursona and want to be an animal to be a furry. Bestiality =/= furry necessarily? Is this right? Like she's a furry ally or a furry lover right? I don't really know much about furries, but even I'm certain that furry is not the same as bestiality. Furry: want to have sex with anthropomorphic animals. Bestiality: Wanting to have (or rather, just have) sex with regular old animals who have no human features or traits.
bnmjy Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 Belle has a really bad case of Stockholm Syndrome. 1
TrigunBebop Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 (edited) And as it is now, Belle just wants to fuck furries. Edited September 13, 2019 by TrigunBebop 1
Recommended Posts