Jump to content
UnevenEdge

I'm gonna hook all of you up to an arousal sensor..


That_One_Guy

Recommended Posts

supposedly some "scientist" "proved" that heterosexuality and Homosexuality are a myth because he hooked men up to an eye dilation sensor and determined that their eyes dilated when they looked at handsome men just the same way as when they looked at beautiful women

 

ignoring the fact that human eyes dilate when we look at ANYTHING pretty or cute (including flowers and cute babies), and you can determine if something is nice looking regardless of your sexuality, despite what cultural norms teach you

(I.e. you can tell when a person you don't wanna fuck is attractive)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mochi said:

 

ignoring the fact that human eyes dilate when we look at ANYTHING pretty or cute (including flowers and cute babies), and you can determine if something is nice looking regardless of your sexuality, despite what cultural norms teach you

(I.e. you can tell when a person you don't wanna fuck is attractive)

That's tough. It is sometimes pretty easy to identify attractive males, but that just may be knowing what features in a male that females find attractive. On the other side, there have been many males that many females consider extremely attractive, and I'm like, "Really? ok..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mochi said:

supposedly some "scientist" "proved" that heterosexuality and Homosexuality are a myth because he hooked men up to an eye dilation sensor and determined that their eyes dilated when they looked at handsome men just the same way as when they looked at beautiful women

 

ignoring the fact that human eyes dilate when we look at ANYTHING pretty or cute (including flowers and cute babies), and you can determine if something is nice looking regardless of your sexuality, despite what cultural norms teach you

(I.e. you can tell when a person you don't wanna fuck is attractive)

i am heterosexual, mochi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SwimModSponges said:

Sexual orientation is a social construct. 

the same can be said of Gender and I agree on SOME level

but not entirely

because to say it's a social construct is a polite way of dismissing people's identities, you're essentially telling them that the way they feel and who they love is something they made up and that they could "Stop feeling that way if they wanted" because their sexuality "isn't real"

and I fucking hate that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SwimModSponges said:

Sexual orientation is a social construct. 

I don't quite know if I believe that, but I do think there is some truth to it, at least. But this post is going to make me go on a tangent, so bear with me...

I think a good deal of transgenderism isn't really valid and is based on social constructs rather than biology. If a transgender person literally feels they have the wrong genitals, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about say, biological men who feel they are women trapped in men's bodies because they want to wear pretty dresses, high heeled shoes, have long flowing hair, love the color pink, etc. Absolutely none of those things are inherently feminine, they are just associated with femininity due to social constructs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

I don't quite know if I believe that, but I do think there is some truth to it, at least. But this post is going to make me go on a tangent, so bear with me...

I think a good deal of transgenderism isn't really valid and is based on social constructs rather than biology. If a transgender person literally feels they have the wrong genitals, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about say, biological men who feel they are women trapped in men's bodies because they want to wear pretty dresses, high heeled shoes, have long flowing hair, love the color pink, etc. Absolutely none of those things are inherently feminine, they are just associated with femininity due to social constructs. 

I feel the opposite way actually

that saying sexuality and Gender is a "social constuct" is a form of Homophobia/Transphobia because it essentially means you're telling LGBT people that their sexual and gender identities are a "dillusion" and that they can and/or should "unlearn" it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mochi said:

the same can be said of Gender and I agree on SOME level

but not entirely

because to say it's a social construct is a polite way of dismissing people's identities, you're essentially telling them that the way they feel and who they love is something they made up and that they could "Stop feeling that way if they wanted" because their sexuality "isn't real"

and I fucking hate that

Just because something is a social construct doesn't mean it isn't "real."

I mean, the definition of a mile is a social construct, but it is concrete when you walk it.

Get it? Concrete? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mochi said:

I feel the opposite way actually

that saying sexuality and Gender is a "social constuct" is a form of Homophobia/Transphobia because it essentially means you're telling LGBT people that their sexual and gender identities are a "dillusion" and that they can and/or should "unlearn" it

How does that not say the same exact thing about heterosexuality?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

How does that not say the same exact thing about heterosexuality?

because people never make the argument that heterosexuality isn't real the same way they do about Homosexuality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

I don't quite know if I believe that, but I do think there is some truth to it, at least. But this post is going to make me go on a tangent, so bear with me...

I think a good deal of transgenderism isn't really valid and is based on social constructs rather than biology. If a transgender person literally feels they have the wrong genitals, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about say, biological men who feel they are women trapped in men's bodies because they want to wear pretty dresses, high heeled shoes, have long flowing hair, love the color pink, etc. Absolutely none of those things are inherently feminine, they are just associated with femininity due to social constructs. 

Transgender =/= gentlemen who dress in drag. To quote eddie izzard, "drag is the male version of tomboy."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SwimModSponges said:

Just because something is a social construct doesn't mean it isn't "real."

I mean, the definition of a mile is a social construct, but it is concrete when you walk it.

Get it? Concrete? 

it basically does, saying something is a social construct means it's something that society "made up" and that it wouldn't exist otherwise, or that it shouldn't

you're basically saying that sexuality isn't real if you say it's a construct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SwimModSponges said:

Transgender =/= gentlemen who dress in drag. To quote eddie izzard, "drag is the male version of tomboy."

I'm not talking about men who consider themselves men who like to dress in drag. I mean biological men who say they knew at a young age they were in the wrong bodies because they were more interested in playing with Barbies, wearing pretty pink dresses, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

That has absolutely nothing to do with considering sexual orientation a social construct.

I'm just saying if you say it's a social construct you're basically implying it can be "changed" or "fixed" and I don't like that implication, let people love who they love, stop trying to disprove that people's feelings are genuine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

I'm not talking about men who consider themselves men who like to dress in drag. I mean biological men who say they knew at a young age they were in the wrong bodies because they were more interested in playing with Barbies, wearing pretty pink dresses, etc.

Those individuals very likely are biologically predisposed to femininity and are acting it out through the cultural mores prescribed to women 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mochi said:

I'm just saying if you say it's a social construct you're basically implying it can be "changed" or "fixed" and I don't like that implication, let people love who they love, stop trying to disprove that people's feelings are genuine

Please don't put words in others' mouths. Like I said, you can say that heterosexuality is just as a made up social construct. If you do not wish to, that's on you.

Those that say gays can be "changed" or "fixed" do not believe sexual orientation is just a social construct. They believe nature and biology says men + women, end of discussion. That is not believing sexual orientation is a social construct. You are putting meaning where it doesn't belong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SwimModSponges said:

I very much disagree.

Laws are a social construct but they exist, as does the government, religion, and dentistry .

I still think calling sexual attraction and love a social construct feels like you're saying it's a choice

because it implies it's not actually something people personally feel in and of themselves but something society is teaching them to feel and now how they really naturally feel

and you know that's bullshit because gay kids growing up see nothing but straight couples kissing in cartoons and we still end up gay

basically saying it's a social construct means you're saying it's not natural, it's not something people would feel without being told to feel it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mochi said:

I'm just saying if you say it's a social construct you're basically implying it can be "changed" or "fixed" and I don't like that implication, let people love who they love, stop trying to disprove that people's feelings are genuine

All feelings are inherently genuine.

They are measurable electrochemical schema within the brain.

Hooray feels.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

Please don't put words in others' mouths. Like I said, you can say that heterosexuality is just as a made up social construct. If you do not wish to, that's on you.

Those that say gays can be "changed" or "fixed" do not believe sexual orientation is just a social construct. They believe nature and biology says men + women, end of discussion. That is not believing sexual orientation is a social construct. You are putting meaning where it doesn't belong.

I'm just saying a "social construct" is something you have to be taught, not something you just feel naturally, so I don't think that term applies to sexuality since sexuality is something you literally have no personal control over and cannot stop yourself from feeling

(no matter what christianity says)

Edited by mochi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mochi said:

I'm just saying a "social construct" is something you have to be taught, not something you just feel naturally, so I don't think that term applies to sexuality since sexuality is something you literally have no personal control over and cannot stop yourself from feeling

That's fine, I have no problem with that. I just have a problem with you saying that saying sexual orientation is a social construct equates to homophobia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SwimModSponges said:

People would feel what they feel regardless, just like your feet feel the concrete when you walk a mile.

The label is still a social construct.

okay that much I'll agree with, the words, straight, gay, Bi and Lesbian themselves, yes, the words themselves are something society constructed as a way to contextualize the already existing feelings that people already felt natutrally, because Language is something society constructed as a way to communicate with other humans

I was thinking the logic was that you were trying to say "all humans are pansexual" or "labels are bad" which is what pisses me off, labels are not inherently bad they're just how humans understand things, and I see that "labels are bad" mentality all over the faux SJW culture on tumblr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

Goddamn it sponges.

I remember when I was little thinking things like, "Why is a tree called a tree? Who came up with that word?"

that epiphany just put into perspective what I was misunderstanding

I was thinking you and sponges (and the other people I've had this same argument with) were trying to say the state of being a man who is romantically or sexually attracted to other men was "made up" (or vice versa for straight people)

but what you were actually saying (I assume) was that CALLING men who love other men "gay" is what was made up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

I'm not sure you're understanding what I was getting at. Yeah, that does answer what I asked. But what about the very, very first word used to describe a tree, regardless of language of origin? Like, why did they pick that word? 

That is a good question. 

No specific answer, but this is tangentially related:

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...