Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, stilgar said:

Did you show Russia your giant doing? Did they think it was an ICBM?

what is the deal with your  obsession with my dick

Posted
12 hours ago, ghostrek said:

what is the deal with your  obsession with my dick

I haven't figured it out either ghostrek....Either they don't believe you're toting, or they are masochist.....For the record, No matter what you're packing, I don't ever want to see it.....I figure it's all gnarled from the broom closet sessions.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

Banning an app = banning the internet?

no but they banned a lot URLs also

Edited by ghostrek
Posted
2 minutes ago, GreatBallsOfJizz said:

Broadly defined anti-terrorism laws being misused? Wherever did Russia get that idea?

the USA   or something form soviet times

Posted
On 5/15/2018 at 5:23 PM, ghostrek said:

 putin  is banning the internet 

trump will do the same 

i wonder what they are protecting the russians from that america didnt feel was all that necessary with fb

it could be political and economic influences, outside govt interference, criminals preying on the russian people, spys, bots, or terrorists.

Posted
37 minutes ago, mumbo13 said:

i wonder what they are protecting the russians from that america didnt feel was all that necessary with fb

it could be political and economic influences, outside govt interference, criminals preying on the russian people, spys, bots, or terrorists.

ok

Posted
1 minute ago, ghostrek said:

ok

CNN and CBS mention almost all of the time in an arena of public knowledge, all of the possible avenues

that the politician or government or issue or whatever, in question would cover, to arrive

at their conclusion- in this case that Russia "wanted" to stop VK and Telegram for ulterior motives. 

thats unlikely at first glance, but if a govt party was reaching too much of a demographic with solicitations or it became a competitive market,

or some kind of recruiting for terrorists or high level surveillance firms were stalking Russia, because they want the best take menu for downtown Moscow,

but see your entire friends lists calendar, schedule, contacts, and limited private stuff that can be hacked,

creating a haven of resources for criminals or worse, it could be shut down for ethical practices.  it could be national security.

an easy way to tell would be to continue using emails, and other messenger services the same way and see if they go uninterrupted.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, mumbo13 said:

CNN and CBS mention almost all of the time in an arena of public knowledge, all of the possible avenues

that the politician or government or issue or whatever, in question would cover, to arrive

at their conclusion- in this case that Russia "wanted" to stop VK and Telegram for ulterior motives. 

thats unlikely at first glance, but if a govt party was reaching too much of a demographic with solicitations or it became a competitive market,

or some kind of recruiting for terrorists or high level surveillance firms were stalking Russia, because they want the best take menu for downtown Moscow,

but see your entire friends lists calendar, schedule, contacts, and limited private stuff that can be hacked,

creating a haven of resources for criminals or worse, it could be shut down for ethical practices.  it could be national security.

an easy way to tell would be to continue using emails, and other messenger services the same way and see if they go uninterrupted.  

i never thougth of it like that

Posted
1 minute ago, mumbo13 said:

im just trying to put it in media perspective that im used to like CBS or CNN.  i am going to watch the video again

i still watch cnn my self

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, ghostrek said:

i still watch cnn my self

another good thing im noticing is that this platform, called VK and the app that followed, Telegram, have always been som kind of resistence

to facebook.  facebook is international, every Russian had access to facebook and the messenger apps by their affiliates, if facebook wants people

using any messenger at all it wants them using theirs, and the professional and social platform something like facebook or VK have is enormous.

we're not talking a few social networking accounts and a few ads and groups.  we're talking control of the largest if not all

social media information and private data available on the web.  so these competitors to facebook are a blessing in themselves

Edited by mumbo13
Posted
38 minutes ago, mumbo13 said:

thats is the most unsightly thing.  id rather see 20 condoms full of sand

Big tits Putin will give you a loan

×
×
  • Create New...