All Activity

I been listening to Pandora radio again lately, just letting it do its thing coming up with new station ideas to keep the variety rolling. (also helps discovering how to block the ads without paying....) This song came up at one point.. def a nostalgia gutpunch. It's been an age, but. It's fascinating how a good finishing song can just tie up everything with a big bow. And when you come back to it, that one song is enough to bring everything back..

Rigged Mr. Hoonie’s car to play “Baby Got Back” every single time he goes in reverse.

Didn’t get away with blasting AC/DC’s “Hells Bells” at a nunnery…. and has multiple awkward hickeys to prove it.

Not reading this thread, so…. Does JK Rowling count as an old Universal Studios monster?

Real. Like essentially revive The Fix from back in the day but make it an all night thing. Throw the cord cutters a bone ffs.

Happy birthmas!

lol how many kids this guy have?

using AI for this, is just absolutely amazing and i'm so glad to witness it's existance. all hail AI.

AI likes the buttchin... even gave the mask a buttchin

It’s only awkward if you make it awkward. Ball’s in your court, nammy.

this is awkward.

It just won a Grammy. 🤭

Damn that whips ass.

I just told ChatGPT to draw something based on the OP and . . . it actually looks good.

Fuck it, I'm burning down the rain forest and using AI to decipher the OP. Absolutely — let’s slow down and unpack what the original author was trying to express. Their writing was a bit tangled, but the meaning is actually pretty clear once you break it apart. Here’s a clean interpretation of what they were saying: What the original author meant 1. They’ve been watching old monster movies for story research. They’re working on a story idea, so they’re revisiting classic Universal monster films. 2. They like the 1931 Dracula. They specifically enjoy the Bela Lugosi version and seem to respect it as a classic. 3. They respect the Universal Frankenstein, but… They acknowledge that the movie version is very different from Mary Shelley’s original creature. They point out that: The literary creature is intelligent He reads the Bible, Paradise Lost, and philosophy He’s much more articulate and thoughtful than the movie version So they’re aware of the contrast between the “monster movie” version and the “well‑read, philosophical” book version. 4. They also respect Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. But here they shift into something more personal. They say: They have anger issues They believe that in the story, Dr. Jekyll is the mask Hyde is the true self This is their interpretation of the character — that Hyde isn’t a separate being but the real personality underneath Jekyll’s polite exterior. 5. The overall theme They’re comparing different classic monsters and reflecting on how: The movie versions simplify things The literary versions are deeper And in the case of Jekyll/Hyde, they personally relate to the idea of a hidden, more volatile self In one sentence They’re saying: “I’m researching old monster movies for a story. I like the 1931 Dracula, I respect the Universal Frankenstein even though the book version is much smarter, and I relate to Jekyll/Hyde because I think Jekyll is just a mask hiding the real self, Hyde.” ...that's a lotta analysis. Sorry environment.

Somehow got away with blasting AC/DC’s “Hell’s Bells” inside a nursery.

I'm in the market for a emulation-based handheld, that's under $100. Y'all have any suggestions? This is my most likely purchase at the moment, but I'm still researching. https://mangmi.com/products/mangmi-air-x?variant=51817216409967

The very concept of a disease brain that seems kind of weird and outdated even by that time albeit popular and Eugenics circles during that era

Fuck, so many dishes I have to wash and this damn kitchen needs to be clean. How the hell did I manage to jack my kitchen in a single day?

Lo, I am become Death, destroyer of words... (Thanks, @Doom Metal Alchemist.)