tsar4 Posted June 17 Author Posted June 17 Moron in Chief attempting to create WWIII Didn't he tell Zelensky in the White House that he was gambling with WWIII? 2 Quote
Jman Posted June 17 Posted June 17 1 minute ago, tsar4 said: Moron in Chief attempting to create WWIII Didn't he tell Zelensky in the White House that he was gambling with WWIII? He’s playing good cop/bad cop.  “We could kill The Ayatollah, but we won’t because we’re nice.”  Granted I doubt the ayatollahs are going to roll over for Israel, even with all the repression and the restrictions. 2 Quote
katt_goddess Posted June 17 Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, Jman said: He’s playing good cop/bad cop.  “We could kill The Ayatollah, but we won’t because we’re nice.”  Granted I doubt the ayatollahs are going to roll over for Israel, even with all the repression and the restrictions. The problem with all this is if the Ayatollah or anyone as their representative said the same thing about Drumpf, there'd be screams of threats everywhere. Which is to say, I'm waiting for that response and hoping it would mean that the big fat toddler would be forced to stay in the WH 24/7, no weekly golf vacations, no pity-me/feed-my-ego rallies because anything less would mean he cried about things for nothing. 2 Quote
Raptorpat Posted June 19 Posted June 19 yeah, the "two weeks" buffer has been consistently overplayed throughout the tariff "negotiations" so I don't believe it at all 2 1 Quote
SwimOdin Posted June 19 Posted June 19 Things would be so much worse if he weren’t a narcissist coward 4 Quote
Raptorpat Posted June 19 Posted June 19 3 hours ago, Raptorpat said: yeah, the "two weeks" buffer has been consistently overplayed throughout the tariff "negotiations" so I don't believe it at all  3 Quote
Insipid Posted June 20 Posted June 20 There are far more batshit conspiracy theories out there, so: Putin: "Cyka, you better not help Israel or the world will be exposed to veritable proof of what you exactly did on Epstein Island." Trump: "Two week recess." 🙄 3 Quote
little_girl_lost Posted June 20 Posted June 20 If he really wants to fuck up Iran, he should just go over there and be their president for a few months  afterthought here, you know he'd jizz in his catheter if anyone ever referred to him as the "supreme leader" 4 Quote
tsar4 Posted June 22 Author Posted June 22 Trump: We've bombed Iran Everybody's got their bunkers ready, right? 1 Quote
Jman Posted June 22 Posted June 22 6 minutes ago, Raptorpat said:  Most of the ghouls in MAGA have run hard on isolation and avoiding foreign wars.  This is…the opposite of that.  Let’s see how loyal the base is. 3 Quote
Raptorpat Posted June 22 Posted June 22 28 minutes ago, Jman said: Most of the ghouls in MAGA have run hard on isolation and avoiding foreign wars.  This is…the opposite of that.  Let’s see how loyal the base is. consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, of course 4 Quote
stilgar Posted June 22 Posted June 22 31 minutes ago, Jman said: Most of the ghouls in MAGA have run hard on isolation and avoiding foreign wars.  This is…the opposite of that.  Let’s see how loyal the base is. I mean, maga ghouls also love to bomb foreigners. 3 Quote
Insipid Posted June 22 Posted June 22 32 minutes ago, Jman said: Most of the ghouls in MAGA have run hard on isolation and avoiding foreign wars.  This is…the opposite of that.  Let’s see how loyal the base is. This is indeed causing a bit of fracturing, but the majority of braindead magats will still follow him. Unfortunately, 30 percent is probably the bottom approval rating for Trump. 4 Quote
katt_goddess Posted June 22 Posted June 22 I have this book in my library. I don't remember buying it but it's here. 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 Trump used to brag how he never started any wars. Now he can brag about how he started WWIII 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 Link w live updates https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-conflict-06-21-25-intl-hnk  for the folks that like to click links Quote
Raptorpat Posted June 22 Posted June 22 imagine if there were some sort of deal related to Iran's nuclear capabilities, let's call it a "nuclear deal" and imagine if that nuclear deal would have prevented them from developing nuclear weapons while developing a direct diplomatic relationship and offering an opportunity to reintegrate with the world and now envision that this nuclear deal would have been ten years old, but someone eight years ago decided to unilaterally revoke it because it was good rightwing politics 3 6 Quote
Raptorpat Posted June 22 Posted June 22 8 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Link w live updates https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-conflict-06-21-25-intl-hnk  for the folks that like to click links they didn't brief any of the relevant congressional Democrats 4 Quote
Jman Posted June 22 Posted June 22 28 minutes ago, stilgar said: I mean, maga ghouls also love to bomb foreigners. Some do, but a lot of their split with regular neocons besides being louder and dumber was their approach to foreign policy, like trashing USAID, something neocons viewed as soft power. 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 21 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: they didn't brief any of the relevant congressional Democrats Why did they shut them out?  Imagine if Dems had done that  another thing, they said that after Iran’s strike on Israel their weapons stockpiles are depleted. So which is it? Is Iran weak and on life support or are they a threat w nuclear weapons? I don’t see how they could be both 3 Quote
Raptorpat Posted June 22 Posted June 22 their convenient excuse is presumably "they aren't in the majority and aren't the committee chairs" but we know why they'd cut out the opposition party and they probably would have done it had the Democrats had either majority 3 Quote
Jman Posted June 22 Posted June 22 8 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Why did they shut them out?  Imagine if Dems had done that  another thing, they said that after Iran’s strike on Israel their weapons stockpiles are depleted. So which is it? Is Iran weak and on life support or are they a threat w nuclear weapons? I don’t see how they could be both This sounds like the Iraqi Osiris reactor incident again, where the objective is to prevent them from having nuclear technology, period, but not to go beyond that. 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 1 minute ago, Jman said: This sounds like the Iraqi Osiris reactor incident again, where the objective is to prevent them from having nuclear technology, period, but not to go beyond that. And they can’t have nuclear technology because why? Because they’re a Muslim theocracy? Idw them having nukes but shit can’t they at least have some nuclear power? 3 Quote
Jman Posted June 22 Posted June 22 2 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: And they can’t have nuclear technology because why? Because they’re a Muslim theocracy? Idw them having nukes but shit can’t they at least have some nuclear power? In 1981 it was because Israel didn’t want to Saddam to have the bomb, and they feared any civilian nuclear enrichment would be covered for a bomb.  Same deal here. 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 11 minutes ago, Jman said: In 1981 it was because Israel didn’t want to Saddam to have the bomb, and they feared any civilian nuclear enrichment would be covered for a bomb.  Same deal here. Is it common for a country to allow their military and weapons be reduced to a joke, Their last strike, a year back or we was drones and now, reportedly they don’t have much to strike back with, all to pursue nuclear weapons?   I don’t think any attack from Iran was imminent. 3 Quote
naraku360 Posted June 22 Posted June 22 1 hour ago, katt_goddess said: I have this book in my library. I don't remember buying it but it's here. Â 1 1 Quote
Dark_Cloud_Overhead Posted June 22 Posted June 22 50 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: And they can’t have nuclear technology because why? Because they’re a Muslim theocracy? Idw them having nukes but shit can’t they at least have some nuclear power? They did, and could have it in a world run by rational thinking adults, like we had during the Obama administration. Once his deal got scrapped, it only made sense for them to not trust us anymore and think their best option was to ramp up enrichment and move towards developing a nuclear weapon as a deterrent to preserve their regime. Sadly, I believe they were probably getting pretty close to a nuke and there's a really good chance if they got one they would use it at some point on Israel. Thing is we'll never know what the state of their nuclear program really was because some numbskull screwed up the deal and our ability to verify anything. Always stamping out experts and truth, always creating doubt and fear whenever and wherever possible... I know he only really did it to try and erase any and all accomplishments of President Obama that he could, cuz his racist little peen couldn't stand that he was actually loved and seen as having been very successful by an actual majority of Americans, but it's totally in line with his greater M.O. when you think about it. Once the light of truth is extinguished, makes it easy for them to make up whatever reality they want. The seeds of this situation were planted long ago, and now the warmongering Netanyahu's just taking advantage of the whole situation. Trump's given him a blank check and he's to no surprise cashing it in now by maneuvering him into dropping these bombs. Violence always begets more violence though, and it's just a matter of time before we pay a price for this I believe. Even if we have them backed into the proverbial corner, I really doubt Iran is just going to fold. At some point, in some way, they'll be striking back cuz it's just human nature. 5 Quote
naraku360 Posted June 22 Posted June 22 1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said: another thing, they said that after Iran’s strike on Israel their weapons stockpiles are depleted. So which is it? Is Iran weak and on life support or are they a threat w nuclear weapons? I don’t see how they could be both It depends on their mood. 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 8 minutes ago, naraku360 said: It depends on their mood. Who’s mood? Israel’s or the US’? 1 Quote
Jman Posted June 22 Posted June 22 I think it’s telling that Greene of all people condemned the strikes, but she’s eyeball deep in the MAGA Kool Aid to the point she thinks they’re serious. 3 Quote
Jman Posted June 22 Posted June 22 https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-hezbollah-says-wont-join-fight-after-us-attacks-iran-2088889  Hezbollah declares they’re not getting involved. 1 Quote
naraku360 Posted June 22 Posted June 22 15 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Who’s mood? Israel’s or the US’? Trump's. 3 Quote
tsar4 Posted June 22 Author Posted June 22 1 hour ago, Raptorpat said: their convenient excuse is presumably "they aren't in the majority and aren't the committee chairs" but we know why they'd cut out the opposition party and they probably would have done it had the Democrats had either majority Did somebody pull that app from Hegseth's phone? 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 31 minutes ago, naraku360 said: Trump's. Trump is going to keep bombing Iran because no one gave him a Nobel Peace Prize. That’s the man child we’re dealing with. Iran might be just as fucked as we are. 1 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted June 22 Posted June 22 Unconfirmed reports are coming in stating Iran claims the Fordow facility has been empty for a long time and it’s stock pile relocated 2 Quote
Raptorpat Posted June 22 Posted June 22 https://x.com/IranIntl_En/status/1936772105506291832 1 2 Quote
tsar4 Posted June 22 Author Posted June 22 To: whoever merged my post with someone else's. Not a fan of using their Subject, making it look like I created it. If you're going to use another persons post for a merge, you should use the person's name that created the subject. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.