Jump to content
Scheduled Downtime Sunday - Security Patch Update ×
UnevenEdge

Enter The Trump Kakistocracy…

Jman

By Jman
in Current Events

 Share

Recommended Posts

molarbear Hero

molarbear

Posted
Posted
On 8/22/2025 at 6:49 PM, tsar4 said:

image.png.5230821873d0ac5af9326555c41874b5.png

I was all about this breath of fresh energy, until I got a text from the DNC from Gavin that said "Hello, I'm gavin and I'm upsetting the right at the moment. Donate any amount to show you're with me in this fight." 

It's just kind of like.....

Remember when that didn't help at all during the presidential election? Can we maybe not just immediately go to asking for donations whenever there is even the slightest whiff of momentum? Could we reserve those texts for people in a higher pay grade, possibly? Homie, your party's dismal performance in the last elections is one of the reasons my wallet is hurting

  • Like 5
  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

naraku360
naraku360

Lol the top comment

naraku360
naraku360

Posted Images

discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted (edited)

"Chicago is a mess. You have an incompetent mayor, grossly incompetent, and we'll straighten that one out probably next," Trump said.

 

The Post reported Saturday that Pentagon officials have for weeks been planning a deployment to Chicago that could involve sending thousands of National Guard troops to the city as early as September. Deploying active-duty troops has also been considered, the paper reported.

Edited by discolé monade
  • Sad 1
molarbear Hero

molarbear

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, discolé monade said:

"Chicago is a mess. You have an incompetent mayor, grossly incompetent, and we'll straighten that one out probably next," Trump said.

 

The Post reported Saturday that Pentagon officials have for weeks been planning a deployment to Chicago that could involve sending thousands of National Guard troops to the city as early as September. Deploying active-duty troops has also been considered, the paper reported.

Semi complicated question, hoping you may have some form of an answer being prior military

What happens if a state mobilizes its national guard and refuses to allow them in?

Would that be viewed as treason since they would be defying a federal order? 

  • Like 1
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, molarbear said:

Semi complicated question, hoping you may have some form of an answer being prior military

What happens if a state mobilizes its national guard and refuses to allow them in?

Would that be viewed as treason since they would be defying a federal order? 

all i'm gonna' say is kent state.

look, what i DO know is that if orders came down while i was in, i would have gone with conscientious objector and taken my chances during request mast/office hours,

the president is mobilizing them, for 2 different reasons. 

1 for ice assist - it would seem weapons were issued, not cool

2 for removal of american citizens - side arms WERE issued, and that's scary. 

we're talking national guard, that get together a weekend out of the month, and good party times 2 weeks out of the year. 

i don't see this ending well...but that's not what you asked

no, it wouldn't be treason, the gov. can deny access, as long as the guard was not federalized if so, then  gov. has no authorization over their own guard. but i don't think treason fits. 

tl:dr

yeah...this is NOT good. like at all.

 

  • Like 2
molarbear Hero

molarbear

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, discolé monade said:

all i'm gonna' say is kent state.

look, what i DO know is that if orders came down while i was in, i would have gone with conscientious objector and taken my chances during request mast/office hours,

the president is mobilizing them, for 2 different reasons. 

1 for ice assist - it would seem weapons were issued, not cool

2 for removal of american citizens - side arms WERE issued, and that's scary. 

we're talking national guard, that get together a weekend out of the month, and good party times 2 weeks out of the year. 

i don't see this ending well...but that's not what you asked

no, it wouldn't be treason, the gov. can deny access, as long as the guard was not federalized if so, then  gov. has no authorization over their own guard. but i don't think treason fits. 

tl:dr

yeah...this is NOT good. like at all.

 

I honestly think this is what they're going for already.

It wasn't working, so they keep feeding this myth to the media that these towns are lawless thunderdomes and I assuming they're hoping someone gets anxious and trigger happy.

They don't care who, they're just looking for a reason 

My question, though, more about the national guard orders

I thought they were state militias that took orders from the governor? My question is more along of lines of if they try to send national guard in from other states, and the illinois governor has their national guard meet them and say "hell nah...gtfo"

Who has authority? Would the summoned national guard from other states be federal troops at that point?

  • Like 2
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, molarbear said:

I honestly think this is what they're going for already.

It wasn't working, so they keep feeding this myth to the media that these towns are lawless thunderdomes and I assuming they're hoping someone gets anxious and trigger happy.

They don't care who, they're just looking for a reason 

My question, though, more about the national guard orders

I thought they were state militias that took orders from the governor? My question is more along of lines of if they try to send national guard in from other states, and the illinois governor has their national guard meet them and say "hell nah...gtfo"

Who has authority? Would the summoned national guard from other states be federal troops at that point?

if prez called in ntl guard from a specific state, gov has no authority over his guard. if prez called in guard from another state and attempted to invade a state and gov called in his ntl guard, then, i think i would be more concerned if pres succeeded. however (and luckily?) it is against the law and unconstitutional for the pres. to 'invade' within the interior. what trump is doing is right at the tippy toe line,   against fed. mandates.

arming those ntl guard in DC is by design.  these folks do NOT train for this type of situation. never has any base, camp, detachment, or fort that i've ever trained at, train you to be armed against american civilians  -  i'm not saying that we're not trained to handle hostile IF NEEDED.  BUT...and that's a HUGE but, there are all kinds of protocols in place before *insert diety of choice* forbid, that would be needed. 

when we were requested by the gov. for the LA riots, our ONLY "weapons" were batons, shields/helmets. that's it. hand to hand was the extent of force.  because you know...american citizens. 

Edited by discolé monade
lol...channeling my inner mr hoonie.
  • Like 2
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Raptorpat said:

"I'm going to end the weaponization of justice"

 

“No one is above the law” 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

does he ever even hear himself?

😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

  • Haha 3
scoobdog Monster Mutant

scoobdog

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, molarbear said:

I honestly think this is what they're going for already.

It wasn't working, so they keep feeding this myth to the media that these towns are lawless thunderdomes and I assuming they're hoping someone gets anxious and trigger happy.

They don't care who, they're just looking for a reason 

My question, though, more about the national guard orders

I thought they were state militias that took orders from the governor? My question is more along of lines of if they try to send national guard in from other states, and the illinois governor has their national guard meet them and say "hell nah...gtfo"

Who has authority? Would the summoned national guard from other states be federal troops at that point?

You mean like Cal Guard facing off against the California National Guard?

  • Like 2
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, scoobdog said:

You mean like Cal Guard facing off against the California National Guard?

still can't happen. by law, that is. IF that is the scenerio...than we're in bigger trouble than treason. 

and treason would only apply if gov. were to lose. 

right? maybe?

fuck..you know..i don't even know anymore. because everying i knew through service and life has literally been turned sideways...not quite upside down..

but def. sideways. 

ntl guard, called on the homeless and mentally ill.

never in my fucking life time. 

  • Like 2
scoobdog Monster Mutant

scoobdog

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

still can't happen. by law, that is. IF that is the scenerio...than we're in bigger trouble than treason. 

and treason would only apply if gov. were to lose. 

right? maybe?

fuck..you know..i don't even know anymore. because everying i knew through service and life has literally been turned sideways...not quite upside down..

but def. sideways. 

ntl guard, called on the homeless and mentally ill.

never in my fucking life time. 

Not to put words in Molar's mouth here, but there is theoretically at least one way in which a state militia or state reserve could impede the state's national guard without directly conflicting with it (which seems to be functionally impossible in addition to being illegal).

Using California as an example, many but not all Cal Guard members hold standing in the National Guard.  If Cal Guard is deployed to do its thing before Trump decides to mobilize the National Guard, there is a potential for conflicting orders and some Cal Guard members who would be following only the governor.  It's more of a technical than a practical issue, nonetheless Newsome could hamstring the military operating inside its own borders at least initially.  It's uncharted territory so there's no real way of knowing what would happen if it were to come up.

One other thing to bring up since Hogseth (oink oink) is an inompetent bigoted drunk - a state governor deploying his state's reserve guard necessitates the DoD actually following military protocol.  In California (and presumably everywhere else the NG was deployed), DoD did not issue official orders prior to mobilization.  I assume it was either a cheap tactic to show force either due to the questionable legal nature of the declared state of emergency, due to a lack of budget to pay deployed troops, or a combination of the two, but even if it was just an oversight bred by incompetence, it would further delay any federal command.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

and heeeerrrreeee weeee goooooo

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/08/prosecuting-burning-of-the-american-flag/

We should just go out and burn all the American flags now.  
 

our country sucks with its unclear rulings. Flag burning is protected speech but not if it incites violence aka “fighting words” 

this will go before the SC and will surprise no one when they say “flag burning isn’t protected speech” which it is but they will say it’s not. 

  • Thanks 3
rpgamer Luminary

rpgamer

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

This shit ain’t funny though. Mandating torture “treatment” be paid for by insurance companies while barring medically based and accepted treatments 

https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2025/08/coverage-gender-affirming-care-will-be-eliminated-fehb-plans-2026/407553/
 

well at least if someone is already getting treatment they’re still going to be covered but for how long?

 

If we're stuck with suffering this bullshit, I'd be on board with some more malicious compliance.

Erectile dysfunction meds banned. Hair loss treatments banned. If shit is word-for-word promoted to "make you feel more like a man," that's literally gender affirming care.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, scoobdog said:

Not to put words in Molar's mouth here, but there is theoretically at least one way in which a state militia or state reserve could impede the state's national guard without directly conflicting with it (which seems to be functionally impossible in addition to being illegal).

Using California as an example, many but not all Cal Guard members hold standing in the National Guard.  If Cal Guard is deployed to do its thing before Trump decides to mobilize the National Guard, there is a potential for conflicting orders and some Cal Guard members who would be following only the governor.  It's more of a technical than a practical issue, nonetheless Newsome could hamstring the military operating inside its own borders at least initially.  It's uncharted territory so there's no real way of knowing what would happen if it were to come up.

One other thing to bring up since Hogseth (oink oink) is an inompetent bigoted drunk - a state governor deploying his state's reserve guard necessitates the DoD actually following military protocol.  In California (and presumably everywhere else the NG was deployed), DoD did not issue official orders prior to mobilization.  I assume it was either a cheap tactic to show force either due to the questionable legal nature of the declared state of emergency, due to a lack of budget to pay deployed troops, or a combination of the two, but even if it was just an oversight bred by incompetence, it would further delay any federal command.

ok...but see, now we're going around our elbow to get to our asses. 

i guess i thought i was saying something along those lines. this avenue is now too diluted to understand who would be correct...except what i know is that cal guard, and any other state guard fall under national guard....so, now we're playing with a timeclock? that is who gets orders first. and either way, gov has full play on that....i thought. 

  • Like 2
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

We should just go out and burn all the American flags now.  
 

our country sucks with its unclear rulings. Flag burning is protected speech but not if it incites violence aka “fighting words” 

this will go before the SC and will surprise no one when they say “flag burning isn’t protected speech” which it is but they will say it’s not. 

i look around at all the cross lit, flag waving patriots here.

most of the 'flags' usually sit in tatters for a couple weeks...until someone changes them. 

this is another distraction. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Raptorpat Monster Mutant

Raptorpat

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

btw...this is RICH coming from the biggest ....well..you know. 

it's so painfully blatantly obvious

in Russia, problematic people "fall out windows" - and in magaland, black Democrats in positions to check and balance "commit mortgage fraud"

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, discolé monade said:

i look around at all the cross lit, flag waving patriots here.

most of the 'flags' usually sit in tatters for a couple weeks...until someone changes them. 

this is another distraction. 

I was thinking about that too I see so many American flags waving in front of homes all hours and all weather in all fucked up conditions. Maybe I’ll go around and collect those flags and burn them. Put them out of their misery already. 

  • Like 3
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, discolé monade said:

well...she's not THAT old... :P

but she is very black, indeed. 

The pic I saw of her in the NYP she looked older. Definitely middle aged 😆and if there’s anything I learned about women in Trump’s orbit is this, if he doesn’t want to fuck them or wouldn’t fuck them anymore, they’re disposable  

 

  • Like 1
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

🤦🏿‍♂️🤷🏿‍♂️ So were just making pedophilia great again. Who wrote this and said "yeah, this is what the people want"....Fucking hate it here.

 

Screenshot_20250825-221810.png

The person who wrote that piece must’ve worked on the set of the movie “cuties”

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted (edited)

Trump making a few threats against NYC. He’s threatening to send in the National Guard and now he’s threatening to withhold federal funds if we don’t get rid of cashless bail

cashless bail isn’t without issues. It was presented as something only for nonviolent crime which I was all for. Idk exactly all the issues but I think some crimes we would see as violent might not have been classified that way and judges didn’t have discretion but Hochul claims to have rewritten some of the laws. One thing I do know is that there was never cashless bail for crimes such as murder, like Trump claims 

https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2025/08/26/reckless---ny-gov-pushes-back-on-trump-s-cashless-bail-funding-threat--nyc-mayoral-candidates-react
 

Jessica Tisch, the police commissioner of nyc (yes she’s from the wealthy af Tisch family) says “the NYPD doesn’t need the National Guard”

 

Edited by 1pooh4u
Forgot to say what the nepo commissioner said
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

trump is such a fucking joke. 

and we are the punch line. 

Yup. He dgaf. He stays saying dumb shit. Anything to deflect and distract. He’s a real fuckin asshole 

  • Like 2
Raptorpat Monster Mutant

Raptorpat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said:

now he’s threatening to withhold federal funds if we don’t get rid of cashless bail

the thing about cashless bail is that it isn't really about the bail, it's about when *pre-trial* detention is appropriate in a society where defendants are innocent until proven guilty.

there are certain crimes where the defendant is a clear danger, like murder etc. but the point of cash bail is to address like flight risks. if you put $X000 down you're less likely to skip out because you want your money back. but it effectively creates an off-the-books crime of being too poor to afford bail. two-tiered justice and all that.

so this is just yet another example of maga dipshits not caring about "law and order" and really only caring about "order".

  • Thanks 3
1pooh4u Monster Mutant

1pooh4u

Posted
Posted

It’s amazing what assholes are willing to believe. The insanely wealthy get billions of our tax dollars to fund their projects, commit fraud which further costs us and then they exploit tax loopholes so that they pay nothing or close to nothing in federal taxes, but it’s the people on Medicaid and foodstamps that are why you don’t have a job or eggs are $9 a dozen. 

NYC bail reform is not the reason why the federal minimum wage hasn’t gone up in almost a quarter century. It’s not the reason why everything costs more. It’s bullshit nonsense 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Raptorpat said:

yes, and let's also not forget that they plainly don't believe in white collar crime as a general rule

(unless it's mortgage fraud) .....well...for black folk in positions of power.....

 

  • Like 2
discolé monade Monster Mutant

discolé monade

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

This is the result of his bullshit chaotic and unclear tariff enforcement and exemptions. Postal service delivery was supposed to be exempt from tariffs but no one knows exactly wtf that means so a few countries said “fuck this I’m out until you get this shit sorted out”

and by design, we start getting seperated from the world.....

*i am wearing my beautiful foil chapeau on most days*

  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...