Icarus27k Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted September 21, 2023 Author Share Posted September 21, 2023 Rupert Murdoch gave control of Fox to his son Lachlan. They say he’s more to the right than his father. https://amp.theguardian.com/media/live/2023/sep/21/rupert-murdoch-fox-news-steps-down-chairman-lachlan-latest 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted September 21, 2023 Share Posted September 21, 2023 4 hours ago, 1pooh4u said: Rupert Murdoch gave control of Fox to his son Lachlan. They say he’s more to the right than his father. https://amp.theguardian.com/media/live/2023/sep/21/rupert-murdoch-fox-news-steps-down-chairman-lachlan-latest The way they are going, they won't have any money to keep being public assholes. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman Posted September 22, 2023 Share Posted September 22, 2023 Because we needed a sequel series to Succession already. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted November 2, 2023 Share Posted November 2, 2023 Quote Think, for just a moment, about the worst relationship in your past—and why it ended. Odds are, there wasn’t just one reason, it wasn’t one thing, it was everything: a book’s worth of fights and slights and resentments and grievances. Maybe there was a final indignity—an affair, a betrayal, the discovery of a derogatory text—but even if one party was blindsided, the other could list a dozen long-gestating reasons for the breakup. That’s why Fox dropped Carlson. It wasn’t one thing. It was everything. Yes, he was in the sights of the Fox board. Yes, he was under scrutiny for his “cunt” texts. Yes, his “white men fight” message made matters worse. Yes, his show’s climate was so hostile that Grossberg had standing to sue. But there was so much more: Carlson repulsed large swaths of the company he worked for. He created internal strife with his conspiratorial commentaries. He exposed Fox to defamation suits from the likes of Ray Epps. He offended key executives and seemed to take delight in doing so, to the point that managers believed he broke rules and norms just to show he could. He strained friendships, as Rupert’s and Lachlan’s chums repeatedly complained to them about his poisonous rhetoric. He triggered so many ad boycotts and turned off so many advertisers that his time slot was far less profitable for Fox than it should have been. And he committed the cardinal Fox sin of acting like he was bigger than the network he was on. It was a tale as old as TV. Stardom is a potent and often destructive drug. Icarus flew too close to the sun; he got his wings melted. Carlson flapped away, higher and higher, until one day the Murdochs just couldn’t tolerate his flapping anymore. “He got too big for his boots,” Rupert told at least one confidant. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/10/tucker-carlsons-ugly-exit-from-fox-news 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sieg67 Posted November 4, 2023 Share Posted November 4, 2023 I spotted a sign thanking Carlson for his service shortly after his getting canned. Sometimes I hate where I live. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Quote DOVER, Del. (AP) — A lawsuit pitting an electronic voting machine manufacturer that was targeted by allies of former President Donald Trump against a conservative news outlet that aired accusations of vote manipulation in the 2020 election appears headed to trial, following a Delaware judge’s ruling Thursday. Florida-based Smartmatic is suing Newsmax, claiming the cable network’s hosts and guests made false and defamatory statements after the election implying that Smartmatic participated in rigging the results, and that its software was used to switch votes. Newsmax, also based in Florida, argues that it was simply reporting on serious and newsworthy allegations being made by Trump and his supporters, including former New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani and conservative attorney Sidney Powell. Attorneys for both sides asked Superior Court Judge Eric Davis to rule in their favor without holding a trial, which is scheduled to start Sept. 30. On Thursday, Davis granted partial summary judgment to each side but said a jury must decide several key issues. “Statements regarding Smartmatic software or voting machines altering the results of the election are factually false,” wrote Davis, who noted that Smartmatic did not provide any election machines or software used in the 2020 election outside of Los Angeles. However, the judge said that not every allegedly defamatory statement published by Newsmax, including statements about Smartmatic’s ties to Venezuela and its late president Hugo Chavez, has been shown to be materially false. “Therefore, the court will allow Newsmax to contest falsity as to Smartmatic’s connections with Venezuela,” he wrote. In court papers, Newsmax has described Smartmatic as “a struggling election technology company with a checkered history” that is using a legally baseless and unconstitutional theory of liability to try to obtain a massive windfall. Last month, a federal grand jury in Florida indicted three current and former executives of Smartmatic in a scheme to pay more than $1 million in bribes to put its voting machines in the Philippines. Prosecutors allege that Smartmatic’s Venezuelan-born co-founder, Roger Piñate, colluded with others to funnel bribes to the chairman of the Philippines’ electoral commission using a slush fund created by overcharging for each voting machine it supplied authorities. In a favorable ruling for Newsmax, Davis rejected Smartmatic’s claim that the news outlet acted with “express malice” under Florida law, meaning that its primary motivation was to injure Smartmatic. “There is no evidence that Newsmax acted with evil intent towards Smartmatic,” the judge wrote. Davis previously ruled that Smartmatic is a “limited public figure” for purposes of defamation and must show that Newsmax acted with “actual malice” by knowingly and recklessly disregarding the truth. On Thursday, he said actual malice is an issue for a jury, and that a jury also must decide whether Smartmatic is entitled to damages. In another blow to Smartmatic, Davis said Newsmax can argue that it is protected from liability under Florida’s “neutral reporting privilege,” which extends to “disinterested and neutral reporting” on matters of public concern. Newsmax argues that the privilege applies because many of the allegedly defamatory statements were made by third parties appearing as guests, or were rebroadcast after being made by third parties on non-Newsmax platforms. “With these facts, a reasonable jury could find Newsmax was reporting on a matter of public concern without endorsing the allegations surrounding the election,” he wrote, adding that a jury could also find that Newsmax’s reporting was not neutral. Davis also said Newsmax could assert a “fair reporting privilege” regarding reporting by White House correspondent Emerald Robinson about a whistleblower affidavit filed in a Georgia lawsuit challenging the election results. The affidavit involved claims by Powell that Smartmatic had colluded with the Venezuelan government in that country’s 2013 presidential election. Newsmax argues that Florida’s fair reporting privilege applies to accurate reporting on judicial proceedings, including court records, and that Robinson was reporting on the contents of an affidavit filed in federal court. Smartmatic contends that the affidavit was not signed or sworn, and therefore not an official document. Davis said a jury must decide whether the fair reporting privilege applies to Robinson, who erroneously reported that the affidavit was sworn. The Delaware lawsuit, which takes issue with 24 Newsmax reports over a five-week period in late 2020, is one of several stemming from reports by conservative news outlets following the election. Smartmatic also is suing Fox News for defamation in New York and recently settled a lawsuit in the District of Columbia against the One America News Network, another conservative outlet. Dominion Voting Systems similarly filed several defamation lawsuits against those who spread conspiracy theories blaming its election equipment for Trump’s loss. Last year, in a case presided over by Davis, Fox News settled with Dominion for $787 million. https://apnews.com/article/2020-election-smartmatic-newsmax-defamation-6d53a401ed18bff0b2c71a969d9d3868 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 Quote Once more, a voting tech company has settled its defamation lawsuit over false allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election before the start of trial — in this instance, Smartmatic USA’s suit against the conservative network Newsmax. Thursday’s settlement occurred during the jury selection process. A four-week trial was scheduled to begin in Delaware on Monday. Neither side made details of the settlement public. https://www.npr.org/2024/09/26/nx-s1-5130183/newsmax-smartmatic-settlement-defamation-election-lawsuit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwimOdin Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 I need to know numbers. Sad it’s confidential, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naraku360 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 hours ago, Raptorpat said: https://www.npr.org/2024/09/26/nx-s1-5130183/newsmax-smartmatic-settlement-defamation-election-lawsuit Trying to pick up some punishment to hit the ultra-wealthy with be like 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.