Lasty Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 It would cut our carbon emissions faster than anything else we could do, by a wide margin. All that unsustainable infrastructure, gone... 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAss Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 It would also tackle the issue of unemployment, as it would create a lot of job openings. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 smh, ya'll just completely gave up on the comet idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapinator_X Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 That’s like hiring an arsonist to unclog a toilet. Yeah, the toilet’s no longer a problem, but that’s because everything surrounding the toilet is now uninhabitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahutz Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 (edited) the refractory period why not? Do nuclear blasts illuminate or darken the atmosphere? So that leaves the question of totality and it’s respective neighbor, which won’t be talked about in length. A blast might empower that wing nut equation, but what about the fringe? Edited May 20, 2022 by Ahutz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poof Posted May 14, 2022 Share Posted May 14, 2022 On 5/13/2022 at 9:59 AM, Chapinator_X said: That’s like hiring an arsonist to unclog a toilet. Yeah, the toilet’s no longer a problem, but that’s because everything surrounding the toilet is now uninhabitable. a good arsonist could do it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerfectFlowingHair Posted May 14, 2022 Share Posted May 14, 2022 Replaced with so many Chernobyls and Fukushimas, and just enough inhabitable space to make that a problem. Heck, there's still a handful of Japanese sticking it out at the edge of the Fukushima fallout zone rather tham uproot and relocate. And circling back to the original problem: how much heat does an ionized atmosphere trap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real_AirCooledGirl Posted May 14, 2022 Share Posted May 14, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lasty Posted May 15, 2022 Author Share Posted May 15, 2022 On 5/13/2022 at 6:59 AM, Chapinator_X said: That’s like hiring an arsonist to unclog a toilet. Yeah, the toilet’s no longer a problem, but that’s because everything surrounding the toilet is now uninhabitable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostrek Posted May 16, 2022 Share Posted May 16, 2022 oh carp that what i was sent back in time to stop oh well 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distortedreasoning Posted May 16, 2022 Share Posted May 16, 2022 i disagree. big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lasty Posted May 18, 2022 Author Share Posted May 18, 2022 On 5/15/2022 at 10:14 PM, Distortedreasoning said: i disagree. big time. I'm not advocating for it, just to be clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distortedreasoning Posted May 19, 2022 Share Posted May 19, 2022 13 hours ago, Lasty said: I'm not advocating for it, just to be clear. well that doesnt make that stance any more agreeable. as much as a fallout fan that i am, a post nuclear world would suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lasty Posted May 20, 2022 Author Share Posted May 20, 2022 On 5/18/2022 at 11:11 PM, Distortedreasoning said: well that doesnt make that stance any more agreeable. as much as a fallout fan that i am, a post nuclear world would suck. Yes, it would suck, in all the ways you're imagining, AND it would drastically cut our carbon emissions, give the people left a chance to rebuild sustainably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distortedreasoning Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 6 hours ago, Lasty said: Yes, it would suck, in all the ways you're imagining, AND it would drastically cut our carbon emissions, give the people left a chance to rebuild sustainably. but whats the point? the only way to reduce emissions is to annihilate all life on the planet and make most of the planet uninhabitable for any survivors? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lasty Posted May 25, 2022 Author Share Posted May 25, 2022 On 5/20/2022 at 3:46 PM, Distortedreasoning said: but whats the point? the only way to reduce emissions is to annihilate all life on the planet and make most of the planet uninhabitable for any survivors? I did not say "The only way". Please go back and double check that. Point here is, if you survive one, be sure the people you're with are rebuilding sustainably, since you would have that opportunity. It's funny how I'm so good at finding silver linings, but I suck at pointing them out. Or maybe other people are just that bad at seeing them? ppl all like "No, that's a storm cloud, idiot" -__- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distortedreasoning Posted May 27, 2022 Share Posted May 27, 2022 On 5/25/2022 at 9:50 AM, Lasty said: I did not say "The only way". Please go back and double check that. Point here is, if you survive one, be sure the people you're with are rebuilding sustainably, since you would have that opportunity. It's funny how I'm so good at finding silver linings, but I suck at pointing them out. Or maybe other people are just that bad at seeing them? ppl all like "No, that's a storm cloud, idiot" -__- i know you know. but i disagree with any "silver lining" post nuclear war. it can only be seen as a failure of humanity. im sorry but there is no way to discuss a "on the bright side" to this topic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts