Jump to content
UnevenEdge

You have to see this trolling to believe it


Ginguy

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

This is bad but if those cake bakers can refuse to serve gay couples THIS IS ABSOLUTELY OKAY!

He didn't refuse to serve them. He refused to make a cake for a gay wedding. He was practicing his freedom of religious beliefs.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Greeny said:

He didn't refuse to serve them. He refused to make a cake for a gay wedding. He was practicing his freedom of religious beliefs.

Ok tell me what bible verse says you cant bake cakes for gays? I'll wait.

Also, i bet they ate shrimp and wore mixed threads and possibly even had premarital sex while refusing to bake that cake. I didn't know the bible was a choose your own adventure book or create your own religion a la carte.

Edited by fuggstop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

Ok tell me what bible verse says you cant bake cakes for gays? I'll wait.

Also, i bet they ate shrimp and wore mixed threads and possibly even had premarital sex while refusing to bake that cake. I didn't know the bible was a choose your own adventure book or create your own religion a la carte.

The bible says no such thing. It doesn't have to. He was a Christian who was against gay marriage. They wanted things written on the cake that supported the idea of gay marriage and he didn't want to condone it, but he said he would bake them a cake with no such messages written on it. He was perfectly within his legal right to do so and the Supreme Court agreed with a vote of 7 to 2.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Greeny said:

The bible says no such thing. It doesn't have to. He was a Christian who was against gay marriage. They wanted things written on the cake that supported the idea of gay marriage and he didn't want to condone it, but he said he would bake them a cake with no such messages written on it. He was perfectly within his legal right to do so and the Supreme Court agreed with a vote of 7 to 2.

So hes Christian but doesn't have to listen to the bible. Ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't know how to clerk right.. I always just talked shit back and when they say they're calling corporate I point to the handwritten sign with the number on it I made myself.. Worked everytime. I think corporate would even get a kick out of the steamy phone call that followed most of the time anyway...

One lady legit told me she was going to sick the president..like not the CEO THE ACTUAL POTUS  on me, because she got upset that I kicked her out and said something like "who are you anyway, you;re no one..that's why you work here..blahblahblah.." bite my shiny metal veteran ass.. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Greeny said:

How is he not listening to the bible when it doesn't say anything about gay wedding cakes? Are you actually retarded?

Uuh

Ok moron

My point is if its not in any bible it cant be against his religion. If u say he was against the message then this clerk is still right because hes against the message of trump and make America great again. Im done here

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mini_Ghost said:

what a child. this why I don't think libs are very cool at all. you don't like Trump? so what sell me the damn vape juice :D

 

 Like exactly, the funniest part is all the clerk had to do is sell him the vape. The troll actually says that at one point. The clerk just totally failed.

Troll: "Just ring the shit up"

Troll: "Do my bidding"

NPC : REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ginguy said:

 

 Like exactly, the funniest part is all the clerk had to do is sell him the vape. The troll actually says that at one point. The clerk just totally failed.

Troll: "Just ring the shit up"

Troll: "Do my bidding"

NPC : REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

yeah I laughed at that too. that was after he called his boss.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PhilosipherStoned said:

He doesn't know how to clerk right.. I always just talked shit back and when they say they're calling corporate I point to the handwritten sign with the number on it I made myself.. Worked everytime. I think corporate would even get a kick out of the steamy phone call that followed most of the time anyway...

One lady legit told me she was going to sick the president..like not the CEO THE ACTUAL POTUS  on me, because she got upset that I kicked her out and said something like "who are you anyway, you;re no one..that's why you work here..blahblahblah.." bite my shiny metal veteran ass.. 

The sign is a nice touch.xD

Yeah, people who act like an ass over a $10/hr job are just doing everything wrong.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

Uuh

Ok moron

My point is if its not in any bible it cant be against his religion. If u say he was against the message then this clerk is still right because hes against the message of trump and make America great again. Im done here

 

The bible condemns homosexuality as a sin. He's against the union of two gay people and used his religious freedom to not condone it on a cake. The fact that the bible says nothing about cakes is irrelevant. The homosexuality was his issue. 

Refusing to serve someone who supports Trump has nothing to do with religious freedom.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PhilosipherStoned said:

He literally went "REEEEE" to I think.. I like to side with clerks.. I think the majority of bystanders do in that kind of situation, but REALLY man. ,

right because most of the time it's the customer acting like a customer is always right bullshit but this guy was just... come on man grow up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do kind of want to know if anything more was said before this recording, like was he acting really pompous from the start...cursing? It probably wouldn't change my feelings at all at this point I just don't understand how you can get so upset you just REEEEEEEE!>:(>:(

MAybe if he at least had a more metal version. He needs to work on it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same people crying religion cry that they dont want gay lifestyles forced on them but feel as if they have a right to force their religious beliefs on other people.

Also the bible doesn't condemn sexuality. Motherfuckers don't even read their bible or even look up the several meanings of the original languages its written in. It condemns pagan homosexual rituals...not homosexuality itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

Same people crying religion cry that they dont want gay lifestyles forced on them but feel as if they have a right to force their religious beliefs on other people.

Also the bible doesn't condemn sexuality. Motherfuckers don't even read their bible or even look up the several meanings of the original languages its written in. It condemns pagan homosexual rituals...not homosexuality itself.

The guy wasn't forcing his religious beliefs on anyone. He was only practicing his own. He didn't tell the guys to stop being gay.

The bible doesn't condemn homosexuality now? It doesn't call it a sin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Greeny said:

The guy wasn't forcing his religious beliefs on anyone. He was only practicing his own. He didn't tell the guys to stop being gay.

The bible doesn't condemn homosexuality now? It doesn't call it a sin?

I've never seen it called a sin growing up Irish Catholic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Greeny said:

The guy wasn't forcing his religious beliefs on anyone. He was only practicing his own. He didn't tell the guys to stop being gay.

The bible doesn't condemn homosexuality now? It doesn't call it a sin?

Nope. Its says homosexual rituals are an abomination. All pagan pratices were condemned but i bet i can go into that bakery on Christmas and see all kinds of Christmas trees...bet they still make Easter bunny cakes...all that pagan shit that makes God angry because they dont know shit about their own "religion".

Its ok. Most "Christians" dont know shit about their bible and don't care...they just want to put their feet on the necks of anyone who dares to be authentic and different. Thats why all their kids are getting fucked by gay men who try to follow that stupid shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Greeny said:

The bible condemns homosexuality as a sin. He's against the union of two gay people and used his religious freedom to not condone it on a cake. The fact that the bible says nothing about cakes is irrelevant. The homosexuality was his issue. 

Refusing to serve someone who supports Trump has nothing to do with religious freedom.

I don't remember any commandment that says thou shall not be gay...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

Nope. Its says homosexual rituals are an abomination. All pagan pratices were condemned but i bet i can go into that bakery on Christmas and see all kinds of Christmas trees...bet they still make Easter bunny cakes...all that pagan shit that makes God angry because they dont know shit about their own "religion".

Its ok. Most "Christians" dont know shit about their bible and don't care...they just want to put their feet on the necks of anyone who dares to be authentic and different. Thats why all their kids are getting fucked by gay men who try to follow that stupid shit.

My bad then. I'm not Christian so I suppose I just went by what I've heard. A gay wedding would be a homosexual ritual, though, wouldn't it? If so, it's within his religious freedom not to support it in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Greeny said:

My bad then. I'm not Christian so I suppose I just went by what I've heard. A gay wedding would be a homosexual ritual, though, wouldn't it? If so, it's within his religious freedom not to support it in any way.

No its not. It has to be in worship of a pagan god. God is a jealous God and condemns anything that puts any other entity above him.

And what makes people gay? God. And God is a perfect God who doesn't make mistakes. So the real sinners are those miserable hateful bakers. (Hatred is also a sin. As well as being judgemental) 

Edited by fuggstop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

No its not. It has to be in worship of a pagan god. God is a jealous God and condemns anything that puts any other entity above him.

 

The bible does say that marriage is between a man and a woman though. It's understandable then why the baker didn't want to support a gay wedding but would have gladly served the couple without doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Greeny said:

The guy wasn't forcing his religious beliefs on anyone. He was only practicing his own. He didn't tell the guys to stop being gay.

The bible doesn't condemn homosexuality now? It doesn't call it a sin?

Deuteronomy and Leviticus have specific prohibitions against male homosexuality; I don't know if it says anything about lesbians, but I'm too lazy and disinterested to look it up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mthor said:

Deuteronomy and Leviticus have specific prohibitions against male homosexuality; I don't know if it says anything about lesbians, but I'm too lazy and disinterested to look it up.

Lesbians are cool though so whatever. The hot ones anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Greeny said:

Lesbians are cool though so whatever. The hot ones anyway.

Accordingo to the Victorians, they were s cool that they didn't exist. It was a crime in England for two men two have sex. Mention two women having sex, and all you'd get was blank stares, because that just didn't happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

No its not. It has to be in worship of a pagan god. God is a jealous God and condemns anything that puts any other entity above him.

And what makes people gay? God. And God is a perfect God who doesn't make mistakes. So the real sinners are those miserable hateful bakers. (Hatred is also a sin. As well as being judgemental) 

Then why did God destroy Sodom and Gomorrah? Have YOU actually read the Bible?

(no)

It's fairy tale bullshit full of contradictions anyway.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mthor said:

Accordingo to the Victorians, they were s cool that they didn't exist. It was a crime in England for two men two have sex. Mention two women having sex, and all you'd get was blank stares, because that just didn't happen.

That's odd considering every woman is bisexual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mthor said:

Deuteronomy and Leviticus have specific prohibitions against male homosexuality; I don't know if it says anything about lesbians, but I'm too lazy and disinterested to look it up.

Not really. Says men should not lie with men as they do with women. Never says dont fornicate and u know fornication is mentioned throughout the bible but not there. My book in school explained that it was talking about a pagan ritual to a fertility pagan god that involved men lying in a field. I don't remember if sex was even mentioned. 

If u are serious about living bible teachings i would think youd get a study bible to better understand it but that just crazy me tho.

Edited by fuggstop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fuggstop said:

There are entire religions that only follow new testament. 

The way to salvation is thru jesus and his teachings and he didnt give a shit about homosexuality. 

So you're better off following the teaching of a political criminal as filtered through his gynephobic amanuenses, rather than the principles that have helped the Jews maintain a corporate identity for well over 4000 years?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mthor said:

So you're better off following the teaching of a political criminal as filtered through his gynephobic amanuenses, rather than the principles that have helped the Jews maintain a corporate identity for well over 4000 years?

Hey i didn't write it or put the two gospels together 

Old testament could very well all be guess work and hallucinations but you not ready for that level yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mthor said:

There are four gospels.

Love you.:P

Books or whatever .testaments. u know what i mean.

When i learned there was scripture and texts as old as what is in the bible but were intentionally left out i pretty much threw the entire b.s. book away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, fuggstop said:

Books or whatever .testaments. u know what i mean.

When i learned there was scripture and texts as old as what is in the bible but were intentionally left out i pretty much threw the entire b.s. book away.

The stuff they left out, the stuff they left in...The only sensible thing that Augustine of Hippo ever said was that Revelations should never have been allowed in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mthor said:

The stuff they left out, the stuff they left in...The only sensible thing that Augustine of Hippo ever said was that Revelations should never have been allowed in.

All of it should be in it. The fact that its not proves its just a tool to manipulate the masses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...