scoobdog

Guy was an unparalleled songwriting talent.

I think even he doesn't know what he's actually doing. When you're a simple person, you spend your time trying to ape the cool kids.

Well, it’s not really designed to be a synonym for despotism or authoritarianism to begin with. It’s a fairly specific ideology that is often conflated with marginally related concepts like imperialism, racism / antisemitism, and nationalism.

Did we really need to give fascism a more hip buzzword? I really think we did.

Police state fash?

Now you gone and done it...

I don't really see evidence of them being used that way, though. I would think that deliberately labelling a MILF as a cougar would be one way of rationalizing the sexualization of a woman, for instance. Obviously, when it comes to guys, there is far less need for distinction. You rarely see anyone labelled a DILF because women eroticize men in a more complex way.

I don't see them as interchangeable. MILFs are certainly sex symbols, but they don't necessarily even want sex. Cougars explicitly want sex.

"Hey Sawdy, what's up man?" Five mInutes later....

The police don’t automatically send SWAT to certain addresses with a history of swatting. I think they take additional steps to confirm with people on the property.

I would think the male counterpart to a cougar would be a sugar daddy.

The more these yahoos agitate for civil war, the more they damage their own party.

The response to this thread is somewhat underwhelming.

The article actually points out that improvements in dealing with post- and peripartum depression have actually done the most to prevent infanticides, making safe-haven laws essentially useless.

This is somewhat relevant: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/09/us/infant-safe-haven-law-abortion-invs/index.html TL;DR - it appears for that same reason, safe haven surrenders are rare despite the prevalence of those laws.

Oh, I didn't misunderstand.

It would look good on him.

Fair enough. Glibness aside, retailers like Walmart fueled this cycle of depreciated wages by undercutting manufacturers who, in turn, prioritize quantity over quality in order to continue to profit in an ultra competitive space. We don't make things in this county not because it's too expensive for consumers but because it's too expensive for retailers. Companies like Costco have been able to somewhat circumvent that (and pay their employees better wages) by relying on volume sales to cut costs, but that model isn't accessible for most consumers, particularly if they're part of the increasingly indigent and disenfranchised former members of the middle class. What has happened is that retailers are taking too big a cut of the profits while suppressing prices to unsustainably low points.

Why? It doesn't support Ginguy's point.

It's a problem called "I shop at Walmart because they have the best deals."

I know someone who I would just love to buy the hat and shirt for. Do they come in a Child's Medium?

That ain't shit.

It's almost like Trump had that long, rambling statement prepared beforehand.

You wouldn't be the only one, of course. I was only pointing out that there are better markers for these insecurities than an OF account.

No offense, but being on OnlyFans does not indicate someone is not monogamous. Also, if you're that insecure about your own body, your not likely to seek out someone who would have an OnlyFans account: while attractiveness itself is in no way a qualification, self-confidence is. Chances are you would be scared away from someone who is self-confident long before you found out they had an OnlyFans account.