discolé monade

has paid subscription TO onlyfans shadow puppets.

oof bad form.

beef stew/roasts ('tators, carrots, celery, onion, garlic) over a bed of white sticky rice, sweet peas and homemade butter rolls. (yeast rolls)

i miss us.

knows a nigerian prince personally, who, incidentally, promised great wealth.

also i miss this commercial

wishes he knew how to cook lasagna from scratch in the microwave.

shh shhhhh shhhh let's watch pat play a little bit. everyone does it.

uses a bottle opener on twist offs, because it proves that he knows he's using a bottle opener on twist offs.

cow and chicken *drops mic*

my 11 year old son just came home from grans, they were watching, and the boy says ' he is saying some really awful things. he's an idiot.'

truly thinks #2 pencils, are made out of the number 2.

stop typing. again. makes no sense. you have clear and defined sentence structure sometimes, and then you don't, and then you put together the most epic run on sentences. just stop it. we know you. for years, we've known. don't be like that other janitor. she is a POS and we dont' need another dingbat janitor. i've always said i like you. you get on my nerves, like a little brother. but i like you. don't be like that other one

we sure had a lot of fun.

oh...don't get me wrong, looks delicious. i...however, make the best cinnamon buns, bar none.

lol lol lol lol she is SUCH A LOSER!!!!!

so she derailed yet, another thread. good job ms. pacman

^virgin roll? it looks like a sticky bun.

When "uneducated" people argue about climate change, they often rely on misconceptions, anecdotal evidence, and a lack of understanding of scientific concepts, frequently claiming that climate change is not real, is caused by natural cycles, or that human impact is negligible, often dismissing the vast consensus within the scientific community due to a lack of in-depth knowledge on the topic. Key points about how uneducated individuals may argue against climate change: Denial of the science: They may outright deny that climate change is happening, often citing personal experiences or weather patterns as evidence against the global trend. Natural cycles argument: They might claim that current climate changes are simply part of Earth's natural cycles, downplaying the role of human activity. Conspiracy theories: Some may believe that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by scientists or political groups for personal gain. Misinterpreting data: They might misinterpret scientific data or cherry-pick information to support their pre-existing beliefs. Lack of understanding of complex concepts: Without a grasp of basic climate science, they may struggle to understand the mechanisms behind climate change, like greenhouse gases. Focus on immediate concerns: They might argue that local issues like the economy or personal finances are more pressing than climate change, which is perceived as a distant problem

also lol But just hours after the new digital currency went live Sunday, her husband’s suffered a precipitous crash of more than 40%, according to Forbes—leading many to connect Melania’s new project to the decline of her husband’s.

^this guy gets it.

it's purely for the fact that tiktok is quite literally insta news, keeping the entire world connected (even the fucking brain rot) but information could/can be passed instantly. something like that. my thoughts on it all anyway. because if anyone thinks meta, and paypal, and twitter , et al aren't collecting the same info, then i'd be shocked. google is adding back the 'fingerprint'