wacky1980

i had some fried chicken and a big ol' chunk of sharp cheddar. it's not glorious, but it made a nice base for all these beers.

is this the part where people are supposed to mock your choice and quantity of beverage? you're teeing it up pretty high, man.

ewwwwno. what kind of beer, like a chocolate stout? i could maaaaybe see that. but not a lager, shit no.

damn, i miss those days! we carted off all the kids to an aunt's house wednesday night, so what did we do? road tripped to the restaurant for dinner and then went bar hopping til 1am. i felt old thursday, that's for sure.

your first hemorrhoid will push you over the line.

bitches be ugly at any age tho.

consider yourself lucky. your tyler durden is only getting stoned and chewing up your data allowance.

the description is right though. you shouldn't use a drain snake or bladder inside your ass. did you just waste 14k won?

this reminds me. i have to put in a pre-buy order for a couple cases of these today. it's tough to get around here, so i have to order it now in order to have a chance at getting any when it's released in september.

i don't know if you can find "boulevard" out there, but they make a couple really good wheats.

i already addressed that point though too. i do not know the history of beer laws in china, but i can't find any record of there having been a ban on alcohol at any time there in the last 2,000 years. and yet, they produce the largest quantity of "bland bread water"-type beers in the world. snow lager is the single best-selling beer there is, more than bud or busch or their light varieties, and most of it is consumed within china. you can't even get it here. so china, which has not had that prohibition-type of blanket-ban on the production and consumption of alcohol at any time in modern history, is responsible for producing one of the blandest, most watery beers there is. and their people vacuum it up. so i don't think it can be said that a lack of production based on any laws is responsible for producing beer to satiate a shitty palate. while i'm not drinking beer right now, i enjoyed a couple kona golden ales last night, plus a toppling goliath pale ale that was spectacular.

i've had pretty good luck with amazon bulbs and lamps for my truck. replaced dome / interior lights, brake lights and turn signals, and some stuff inside the dash. some of them required the load resistors, some didn't. the amazon listings usually contain compatibility charts for most vehicle types. and you're gonna spend about 1/2 to 1/3 as much than if you managed to find them in a store. do eet.

i'ma try to bring this back to a discussion on the statement itself, rather than the several pages of "you NO YOU" that's been going on. "good" is indeed subjective. so is the strength of one's palate. you and nab apparently hate ipa's, and that's fine, but they're one of the biggest styles out there, and are primarily responsible for the surge in domestic craft popularity over the last 30+ years. a person enjoying ipa's (such as myself) does not equate to that person having a rekt palate. i really don't see how the assumption can be made that people's taste in beer has been ruined by a thing that happened over 80 years ago, and has since then, driven the industry into its most successful and robust state in history?

i call bullshit. there were far more breweries in the latter half of the 1800's than there were at the onset of prohibition. if anything ruined the palate of the american beer drinker, it was not prohibition, but rather consolidation, because that was the reason for a majority of the small breweries being shut down. then there's the whole fact that there are more breweries now than there have ever been in the usa (not just pre-prohibition, but pre-1870's). we're exporting more good beer now than we ever have as a country. and the laws are far friendlier toward breweries now than they were pre-prohibition. not that any of that makes a difference, because the overall strength of the industry is not where your claim rests. the statement was that the palate was ruined by prohibition, of which no support has been provided. what i want to know is, how did prohibition ruin the palate? and if it can be argued that this did indeed occur, how is it that this is still reflected today, in a time when there's a greater selection and variety of quality beer than at any other time in history?

too fucking late. my feed is full of this shit today.

i'd also like to point out that prohibition ruined neither.

nothing. there's literally nothing wrong with brandy. and anyone is welcome to drink it. the problem is getting wasted on it.

so you're arguing over semantics rather than content. whatever then, carry on.

if this doesn't scream cat rapist, i don't know what does. srs tho, get wasted on brandy? why do you hate yourself so hard?

no, i think he got it. i'd like to understand how prohibition ruined americans' taste in beer as well. esp considering our piss water is of higher quality than several other countries' piss water. ever had snow? makes budweiser look like hofbrau.

nah, i looked it up. 2.5%. i see you edited post. anyways, weaker than your mama's keystone light.

radler may as well be considered near-beer. what is that shit, like 2.3%?

maybe you need to move towards ciders.

oddly enough, beer to me is exactly like dick to you. i'll take one in the can any day. i didn't think that one through very well.