Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Enter The Trump Kakistocracy…


Jman

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, tsar4 said:

image.png.e2294bfb8f12a024e3e68b838cad971e.png

I was going to post an article about this but I think this might be one of those things that seems fucked up. And in the context of everything Trump has done or attempted to do, it is, but this is something all Presidents do, they put people on the board and make themselves head of it. They probably just don’t make a federal case of it like Trump. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

I was going to post an article about this but I think this might be one of those things that seems fucked up. And in the context of everything Trump has done or attempted to do, it is, but this is something all Presidents do, they put people on the board and make themselves head of it. They probably just don’t make a federal case of it like Trump. 

You mean like this?

image.png.0161e62b61ebda72d2f8e14db86db4d9.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wacky1980 said:

This one's going on mute.

Like I gaf if you mute me.  I have no interest in playing games with you. Learn to read posts in their entirety before claiming “fear mongering” because heaven forbid someone might want to consider doing something you consider unnecessary. Yes we know you’re a banker. No one would actually want to make you work or anything 🙄

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

His wife or their parents are from India, instead of standing by his wife and family, he sided with a racist because “his life shouldn’t be ruined over social media posts he made in college”

Bro….he said this shit just 6 months ago. 

If that brat is a 'kid', then he shouldn't be digging through sensitive national infos. 

And if he's an adult, then he's old enough to know better than to be that stupid and should suffer for his intentional stupidity. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, discolé monade said:

 so i'm looking up some info, for absolutely NO reason. like...at all....

anyway....it's weird how there are highter standards for a ga county commissioner than there are for the u.s. president. 

Screenshot2025-02-083_27_14PM.thumb.png.c05a96c8c3df196b570aa4bbe8842431.pngScreenshot2025-02-083_27_27PM.thumb.png.4d083dabbf81a299c6e2bdd3ae09fb15.png

Sad shit. Trump can’t be a notary cuz you can’t have felonies but he and anyone can run for offices that make national legislation with them. Go figure 🤷‍♀️ 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Cabinet departments — like the Defense Department or the Treasury — as well as independent agencies, like the Securities and Exchange Commission, must comply with the APA in all policy actions or decisions.

The APA was signed by President Harry Truman and received bipartisan support after a decade-long effort by Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

Concerned with a burgeoning "administrative state" after the New Deal expanded the role of executive agencies, Republicans wanted judges to review and curb the executive branch's growing influence.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, tsar4 said:

image.png.6b38f48726f4df92c53fe1ec23e2a081.png

marko elez - working at X

edward coristine - working at neuralink

luke farritor - thiel fellowship member

gavin klegor - software engineer at linkedin/databricks

akash bobba - intern at bridgewater associates

ethan shaotran - studying at harvard

gautier killian - engineer at jump trading

as for what they were doing ... i guess the assumption is hacking an election?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

He looks like someone that would get annoying quick. Elon loves those low morals, no ethics people 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tsar4 said:

I do get a little nervous about leaning on the judicial to hold things together, tho..

Under normal circumstances, totally fine, but, this administration has shown a clear disregard for legality already, and it still relies on actually enforcing the law in a way they don't just ignore. Every unconstitutional order is all too easily jumped on by anyone that thinks to gain from it, politically or financially, despite the orders not explicitly being laws.

Idk. Just sorta anxiously waiting for the masks to come off and they all decide they're just going to make their own rules and declare courts have no power.

Judicial wins are a great start, but I definitely feel a lot better seeing the wins in action.

Costco shareholders rejected a proposal to review the company's DEI protocols

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wacky1980 said:

Yeah but JBP is also a POS.

Why does everything have to be 100% this or 100% that?

Ehh, nevermind. Losing battle around here.

What about what he said is incorrect, though? Or is it okay to ignore fact because it's from someone you don't like?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, naraku360 said:

Care to elaborate?

I don't know anything about him.

Not sure how well you'll accept anecdote, but his policies during COVID damn near killed my small businessES. While others <1hr away flourished, our license was yanked for serving 2 people in the same space at the same time.

I could go on but the effort seems wasted here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wacky1980 said:

He phrased his statements in a way that don't break law. Purely semantics, but here we are.

Vance is justifying Trump, and the administration as a whole, not following the rulings of the courts. He's not posting a non-sequitur; he's teeing up "We know better than you, so we're going to ignore you, Constitution or not." Pritzker is calling it out.

It's fairly obvious your axe to grind is making you biased.

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

Vance is justifying Trump, and the administration as a whole, not following the rulings of the courts. He's not posting a non-sequitur; he's teeing up "We know better than you, so we're going to ignore you, Constitution or not." Pritzker is calling it out.

It's fairly obvious your axe to grind is making you biased.

You have to keep in mind that the entire thing is hypothetical. The courts don't have ultimate authority over the exe branch.

Also, JBP is fiddling while Rome burns...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...