BlackNoir Posted November 15, 2020 Posted November 15, 2020 Obviously, nudity doesn't automatically count as porn BUT also, sex apparently doesn't need to exist for something to be considered pornographic.....I even have heard a case for something being pornographic despite nudity not being involved (Phone sex) I was going to set up some walls here, but you jackasses will just knock em down anyway s oit's wide open. Where is the line between the mundane and the pornographic.
molarbear Posted November 15, 2020 Posted November 15, 2020 5 minutes ago, BlackNoir said: Obviously, nudity doesn't automatically count as porn BUT also, sex apparently doesn't need to exist for something to be considered pornographic.....I even have heard a case for something being pornographic despite nudity not being involved (Phone sex) I was going to set up some walls here, but you jackasses will just knock em down anyway s oit's wide open. Where is the line between the mundane and the pornographic. If they're still wearing shoes in bed, it's 100% porn 1 1 1
BlackNoir Posted November 15, 2020 Author Posted November 15, 2020 10 minutes ago, molarbear said: If they're still wearing shoes in bed, it's 100% porn That's a wide ass blanket you've brought to the party....I'll allow it, but I think this can be refuted.
PhilosipherStoned Posted November 15, 2020 Posted November 15, 2020 Gotta say this was my immediate thought after reading that other thread. I'd put the line at the material being purposely designed to be enjoyed for profit or monetary gain, but it's clear that line's blurry af. 🤷♂️
Poof Posted November 15, 2020 Posted November 15, 2020 there isn't a line. It's more like how in a war there's two sides and no man's land in between and if you're in there, you're not behind enemy lines yet, but you certainly aren't safe 1
Chapinator_X Posted November 16, 2020 Posted November 16, 2020 I think it all comes down to aesthetics. If it looks like it’s designed for someone to jerk off to it, then it’d be porn. Not all pictures with bare feet in them are pornographic, but you’ll know if a picture of a foot was designed to be porn. 1
SwimModSponges Posted November 16, 2020 Posted November 16, 2020 (edited) http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/obscenity-case-files/obscenity-case-files-jacobellis-v-ohio-i-know-it-when-i-see-it/ Quote In his concurring opinion in the 1964 Jacobellis v. Ohio case, Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart delivered what has become the most well-known line related to the detection of “hard-core” pornography: the infamous “I know it when I see it.” statement. j “I have reached the conclusion . . . that under the First and Fourteenth Amendments criminal laws in this area are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.” Edited November 16, 2020 by SwimModSponges 1
Raptorpat Posted November 16, 2020 Posted November 16, 2020 It is pornographic if it serves purely prurient interests.
tsar4 Posted November 17, 2020 Posted November 17, 2020 39 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: It is pornographic if it serves purely prurient interests. Like "Murder Porn".
Recommended Posts