SlappyKincaid Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Everyone knows the moon is only a projection, Piccolo blew it up to stop Gohan's transformation into a super-ape. Some people try to argue that they restored it with the dragonballs, but where's the proof? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillies Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, fuggnificent said: 9/11 was a controlled demolitian the moon landings are fake your govt lies to you GOODNIGHT 9/11 I can def prove was a controlled demo. The moon issue I can't really prove anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom Metal Alchemist Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, fuggnificent said: 9/11 was a controlled demolitian the moon landings are fake your govt lies to you GOODNIGHT And I suppose Ronald Wilson Reagan was the devil, because each of his names has 6 letters, therefore 666, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlappyKincaid Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said: And I suppose Ronald Wilson Reagan was the devil, because each of his names has 6 letters, therefore 666, right? Reagan wasn't the devil, Reagan was possessed by Pazuzu, god get your facts straight. Don't you remember his famous address to russia, where he said "Mister Gorbachev, let Jesus fuck you! Let Jesus fuck you!" and then puked pea soup all over the berlin wall? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuggnificent Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 8 minutes ago, SlappyKincaid said: Yall been getting too many vaccines, because you guys is retarded are you making fun of my southern urban vernacular, bitch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlappyKincaid Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, fuggnificent said: are you making fun of my southern urban vernacular, bitch? I was making fun of you believing conspiracy theories, but I can switch to that if you'd like, seems rude though 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Gun Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 13 minutes ago, fuggnificent said: whoops..we erased it https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nasa-tapes/moon-landing-tapes-got-erased-nasa-admits-idUSTRE56F5MK20090716 If you actually knew how to read, you'd know that the overwritten tapes were of the original transmission format from Apollo 11, not the footage as a whole. Due to the limited amount of live data that could be sent from the Lunar Module back to Earth, the live TV broadcast was in an esoteric slow-scan format that wasn't compatible with normal television broadcast formats. The communication stations back on Earth had to perform a real-time conversion of the signal by a process that involved a camera aimed at a video monitor displaying the original format. That original format was also recorded onto magnetic tapes and archived, but no one thought much of treating them as special (though I wish they had), because they weren't something you could actually show on TV. Those magnetic tapes were expensive, so at some point over the next couple of decades, a lot of older backups were re-used for other purposes. We still have all of the lower-quality converted video that was broadcast on television; none of that was "lost." Later Apollo missions produced much higher-quality TV broadcasts that were also preserved. 17 minutes ago, fuggnificent said: 9/11 was a controlled demolitian the moon landings are fake your govt lies to you GOODNIGHT Yes, we know you're fucking retarded. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuggnificent Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Adminderaptorpat said: no i think he's making fun of you because you're making posts about the moon landing being faked and 9/11 being an inside job i admit...ok so i barely researched the moon stuff yet and this is my 2nd day coming to this conclusion but ill be back after i google it more. but come on...they LOST the original footage? *side eye* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginguy Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 minute ago, fuggnificent said: i admit...ok so i barely researched the moon stuff yet and this is my 2nd day coming to this conclusion but ill be back after i google it more. but come on...they LOST the original footage? *side eye* Why are you still going on? Anderson Cooper has shaken his head. You're done. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuggnificent Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Top Gun said: If you actually knew how to read, you'd know that the overwritten tapes were of the original transmission format from Apollo 11, not the footage as a whole. Due to the limited amount of live data that could be sent from the Lunar Module back to Earth, the live TV broadcast was in an esoteric slow-scan format that wasn't compatible with normal television broadcast formats. The communication stations back on Earth had to perform a real-time conversion of the signal by a process that involved a camera aimed at a video monitor displaying the original format. That original format was also recorded onto magnetic tapes and archived, but no one thought much of treating them as special (though I wish they had), because they weren't something you could actually show on TV. Those magnetic tapes were expensive, so at some point over the next couple of decades, a lot of older backups were re-used for other purposes. We still have all of the lower-quality converted video that was broadcast on television; none of that was "lost." Later Apollo missions produced much higher-quality TV broadcasts that were also preserved. Yes, we know you're fucking retarded. keep drinking the koolaid. i bet you think humans are the only intelligent life as well. Just now, Ginguy said: Why are you still going on? Anderson Cooper has shaken his head. You're done. i did enjoy the gif. my work here is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Gun Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 25 minutes ago, Phillies said: Look you can clearly see in this actual photo how fake the LEM is. I can see shiny gold tin foil and also regular house hold aluminum foil. Black cardboard, there is canvas, ducktape, this is clearly bull shit. Stage prop- fuggz kids could have built it in middle school. art class. Now look at this: So the top half of that little thing flies off and it magically goes into space to connect with the orbiter?? you expect me to believe that?? The "aluminum foil" was a metal-coated insulation material called Kapton, which as I've already said was intended to reflect as much thermal radiation as possible. The ascent stage used it too, but it was covered with thicker shielding to protect the astronauts against micrometeoroids. The black materials were more rigorous thermal blankets in areas that needed additional shielding, coated with high-temperature paint. If you see "cardboard" there, you need your goddamn eyes checked. And yes, the ascent stage lifted off of the descent stage and rendezvoused with the Command-Service Module in lunar orbit. This is literally middle-school science. Newton's Third Law: every action produces an equal and opposite reaction. This is why rockets work. Stop jerking off to a goddamn hologram and get fucking educated. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Gun Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 9 minutes ago, fuggnificent said: i admit...ok so i barely researched the moon stuff yet and this is my 2nd day coming to this conclusion but ill be back after i google it more. but come on...they LOST the original footage? *side eye* So you're admitting you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Fantastic. 7 minutes ago, fuggnificent said: keep drinking the koolaid. i bet you think humans are the only intelligent life as well. You're sure as hell not an example of it, that's for sure. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlappyKincaid Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, fuggnificent said: keep drinking the koolaid. i bet you think humans are the only intelligent life as well. i did enjoy the gif. my work here is done. Statistically, the odds that we are the only intelligent life in the universe is very low. The odds that we're the only life in the universe is also extremely low. But the odds that we've been contacted by alien intelligent life are also low, purely based on the sheer size of the universe. I want Bigfoot to be real, too, but it doesn't mean he is. Do you honestly think that given the scope of espionage between the US and Soviet Union back in the height of the Cold War, that some random joes found stuff that was "better proof" of a faked moon landing, than any kgb or other russian agency's doods would've had? Russia sent men and women to their deaths to beat us to milestones in the space race, if they had anything suggesting we faked the moon landings, plural, they would've been flaunting that loudly. They and every other major power would have no reason to play along, I can guarantee you that they knew we were getting there. If there was any actual evidence of a faked landing, why is it only random bloggers and youtube scrubs that seem to have the damning information? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuggnificent Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 much in the same way they almost fooled us on the 9/11 scam. the govt lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlappyKincaid Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Yes, they lied about 9/11 when they used it as a means to invade Iraq, especially considering the majority of the hijackers were Saudi, and Bin Laden had been funded by us not too long ago to fight those pesky soviets in Afghanistan in the late 80s. "Rambo 3" was about them, who could've guessed that several years later, those same "freedom fighters" would be terrorizing their own people and ours. "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams", sure but a hot burning fire can structurally damage it enough to not support the weight of a massive fucking steel and concrete skyscraper. Armchair engineers talking shit about what the moon lander is made of and how buildings are constructed, and they don't know a damn thing about either. If the moon landing was faked, then how did the nazis build a fucking moon base there? Explain that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Gun Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 20 minutes ago, fuggnificent said: much in the same way they almost fooled us on the 9/11 scam. the govt lies. Do yourself a favor and shut the fuck up before you make yourself seem even more goddamn retarded. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillies Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 35 minutes ago, Top Gun said: The "aluminum foil" was a metal-coated insulation material called Kapton, which as I've already said was intended to reflect as much thermal radiation as possible. The ascent stage used it too, but it was covered with thicker shielding to protect the astronauts against micrometeoroids. The black materials were more rigorous thermal blankets in areas that needed additional shielding, coated with high-temperature paint. If you see "cardboard" there, you need your goddamn eyes checked. And yes, the ascent stage lifted off of the descent stage and rendezvoused with the Command-Service Module in lunar orbit. This is literally middle-school science. Newton's Third Law: every action produces an equal and opposite reaction. This is why rockets work. Stop jerking off to a goddamn hologram and get fucking educated. Thermal Radiation? How does tin foil even do that? makes no sense. Micrometeorites? Nothing could protect against those, maybe heavy duty armor plate. See thats how you know when authority is lying. And if they are lying about their "space kevlar" then guess what that means?? and I don't jerk off to holograms I fuck pillows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillies Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Top Gun said: Do yourself a favor and shut the fuck up before you make yourself seem even more goddamn retarded. Seriously though.. we might have landed on the moon. But don't criticize fuggz about 9/11. Its obvious both towers were controlled demolition caused by George Bush himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnmjy Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 You know, those astronauts have brought back moon rocks. These rocks, when placed under a microscope, show craters that can only be made in a vacuum over millions of years, like the surface of the moon. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Gun Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, Phillies said: Thermal Radiation? How does tin foil even do that? makes no sense. Micrometeorites? Nothing could protect against those, maybe heavy duty armor plate. See thats how you know when authority is lying. And if they are lying about their "space kevlar" then guess what that means?? and I don't jerk off to holograms I fuck pillows ...how the fuck did you pass high school? That. Isn't. Tinfoil. It's a thermally-reflective material. Light wavelengths that are reflected aren't absorbed. The material was designed to reflect wavelengths in the infrared part of the spectrum, i.e. heat. And yes, very small micrometeoroids could be stopped by material of that thickness. That's exactly what it's engineered to do. It couldn't stop anything particularly large, but pretty much nothing could, so it was considered a calculated risk. Seriously, what level of education do you have? You are hopelessly unqualified to have an informed opinion about this. 11 minutes ago, Phillies said: Seriously though.. we might have landed on the moon. But don't criticize fuggz about 9/11. Its obvious both towers were controlled demolition caused by George Bush himself. This is why we should have mandatory IQ tests for voting. Right goddamn here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillies Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 30 minutes ago, bnmjy said: You know, those astronauts have brought back moon rocks. These rocks, when placed under a microscope, show craters that can only be made in a vacuum over millions of years, like the surface of the moon. maybe we only landed on the moon one time and to save money we just hoaxed the rest. So anything is possible, I'm not entirely saying we didn't land on the moon, just I respect the skeptics. I don't trust authorities. You think Uncle Sam landed on the moon just for the sake of science and the prosperity of the human race?? no it was a military operation, the sole purpose of to make us look better then Russia during the cold war. No one gave a flying fuck about moon rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnmjy Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, Phillies said: I don't trust authorities. And this right here is why I don't believe you when you say your father is a doctor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillies Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 That shit be looking fake as hell. This is an actual photo. Why is there gold tin foil on the legs then? Why does the leg even need it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Gun Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Oh gee, I don't know, maybe because there are electronics in it to detect when the rover had touched down? Maybe because having your rover's legs overheat and potentially buckle on impact would be a really bad thing? Tell me, what's your experience with materials science to determine whether or not the lander should have had insulation there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lupin_bebop Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Already did. It's even on an old job's website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lupin_bebop Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 5 hours ago, fuggnificent said: i now believe the moon landing never happened Yeah......I'm sure we can ask the LITERAL 273 members of NASA who were THERE for the incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillies Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 how do you explain this then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalar Hex Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 The moon is a hoax. If it actually existed don't you think we'd have at least some cheese falling down here? You can't have a giant ball of cheese that far above us without a few pieces falling off. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlappyKincaid Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 5 minutes ago, Azalar Hex said: The moon is a hoax. If it actually existed don't you think we'd have at least some cheese falling down here? You can't have a giant ball of cheese that far above us without a few pieces falling off. it burns up in the atmosphere, moron, where you think mozzarella sticks come from? They don't just grow on trees 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnimationFan14 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 10 hours ago, Phillies said: Honestly I think its possible it could have been a hoax. I researched it really hard, and I can't find any hard evidence either way. what i think is interesting- the amount of power it would take to heat and cool both the lunar moduale and the individual suits- it would need to be a big battery pack, maybe even the battery tech didn't exist. Also on the LEM.. I don't think its possible to pilot such a craft without sending it into a tail spin in zero -g. Look at the rocket boosters on the top of the craft. they are little 4 way tiny boosters. If you even fired one of those boosters in mid flight the whole craft would start spinning out of control. also there is no blast crater under the module- think about it it landed with a goddamn rocket firing and the dust under the unit isn't even disturbed... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Hound Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 wanna see my full moon bb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnimationFan14 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 3 hours ago, The Hound said: wanna see my full moon bb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katya_Hiki Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 psh you believe in the moon? amateur mistake 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
death_by_motorboat Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) 18 hours ago, Phillies said: look! ive had headaches i didnt get to go outside cause id rather be asleep. Edited December 4, 2017 by mumbojummie13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillies Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 15 minutes ago, mumbojummie13 said: ive had headaches i didnt get to go outside cause id rather be asleep. mumbo whats your take on the moon landing? was it a hoax? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
death_by_motorboat Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) no. the eagle almost crashed though. https://www.wired.com/2012/05/the-eagle-has-crashed-1966/ Edited December 4, 2017 by mumbojummie13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts