scoobdog

That note was lamer than I expected based on the OP.

You look confused....

WHY NOT?!

You've never had that kind of disposable income.

I have Etymotic Research earbuds.... if you can call them that. They're the kind that have the foam tip and sound isolate. Best headphones money can buy.

And so, ghosty's porn career took off from there.

Most people won't. Since the brain can't usually distinguish stereo sound from front to back which much detail, it still processes as being in front of you. From left to right, it generally doesn't matter unless it's associated with a video where sounds coming from off screen could be confused. I typically do make sure that I have the the correct monitor in each ear, but it doesn't affect the over quality of the sound or the monitors themselves if the ears are reversed.

Along the same lines as Luuv.... this question does not provide adequate context beyond the basic premise to qualify probability.

Because no one could ever fake a text.

How's that coming? Do we need to start crowdfunding for that?

??? How'm I doin'?

Hey, bucket.... remember when Shaq played for the Magic? Yeah, that was the last time you were relevant.

Hey! Nah, it's totally true.

Probably not. If they put up me boards, Ben will be there to ruin it in a matter of hours.

Exactly. We need to have a competition to see who makes the worst threads.

Zeni doesn't make threads go bad, he usually just gets ignored. He does start shit threads, though.

Nah. I'd take a shitty part in a movie if it meant some green and I knew it wasn't going to damage my brand. Shaq's a better marketer than he gets credit for.

She's right, though. When was the last time a thread turned to shit and it wasn't her fault?

Well, this thread turned, didn't it? I'm not sure how much a friend I can be across the cavernous void of the internet, but you know I'm up late most nights just to shoot the shit.

I agree to an extent, but it's not so simple. I'm-just-trolling is the modern equivalent to I'm-just-kidding; you have to reasonably assume that someone using a cheap out from a poorly formed argument is either a terrible comedian or generally spineless in his convictions. In either case, it would be inappropriate to pursue someone for a statement they are unwilling to seriously defend. Calling someone out for backpedaling is one thing, calling them out for believing something even though they're recanting in a cowardly way is another.

Stupid is one thing, bring a shitty actor is another.

Nah, Shaq ain't that dumb. But people seriously believe him? Half of everything he says is clowning.

Obesity is a clinical definition, and that weight in that age group meets that clinical definition. This wouldn't be a topic for discussion if we weren't talking about a prepubescent individual who would be disproportionately impacted by it.

It's not fat shaming to point out that a seven year old should not weight 92 lbs. That isn't criticism, it's concern.

That girl is not 92 lbs. If you get winded by trying to chase her around, it's only because your not as healthy as you think you are.