scoobdog

The Rhianna one was my favorite.

He’s my protégée.

Oh, and...,

I don’t know about your haters, but I need to Know when to swoop in and save your threads.

Don't need to now, bro.

Ah, playing coy I see. Carry on stranger.

And by that, you mean Nabs, right?

Or on October 4, 1995.

Because of all the nasty comments people on the street give you as you walk by?

LoOk At AlL oF yOu BeAuTiFuL pEoPlE

Lol. It's sad watching that vaunted board autism fail so miserably.

He claims he can't taste my balls... but he can taste my balls.

I'm a night owl as well, but... I really like to get up in the morning when I'm able to. My body doesn't like it so much, but I still enjoy it.

Oh no. I’m just going to pretend you didn’t post this.

The same applies. Adult films are subject to at least some regulations, and that mechanism would still apply for something like hazard pay. But, as I mentioned above, you don't necessarily need an industry standard when the its a similar mechanism as another industry (such as the film industry as a whole) because industries that are not specifically regulated fall under general OSHA regulations. What constitutes a hazard in this pandemic isn't dependent on the industry, it's dependent on the situations.

We only have a very limited scope as to which to judge this since prostitution is legal in only in some counties in Nevada, and the licensing of such is not standardized from county to county. Assuming its in one of these few places, the standards would be set by the county licensing agency. Otherwise, there doesn't need to be standards because, like someone already mentioned, illegal prostitiution is individual contracts negotiated at the time of engagement and hazard is factored in as part of supply costs.

Okay, serious Scoob. I don't see why standards need to be set by the industry, when there is an objective reference for hazard pay. It's not like you're being paid hazard just because its hazardous: there are requirements that any one person might need in a given situation that they might need to maintain the minimum hazard exposure required for the job, and hazard pay ostensibly goes to compensating the worker for meeting those demands. The specific implementation of those measures might be specific to that job, but the components applied to that implementation would still be universal.

Indeed you did.

His girlfriends should get hazard pay... without the pandemic.

Is the solution of the mathematical expression in that meme as written real?

C'mon, man. We don't get decent thought exercises that much around here.

Is it?

I have no idea how that would work. This is only ancillary to discussion, but it's worth knowing how sex workers in legal brothels have been dealing with this. The thing about sex work is that it isn't just sex - it's companionship and that is something that is essential in its own right. It highlights the fact that what is deemed essential and what is not deemed essential is not based on what people actually need as much as what is needed to support the infrastructure. Otherwise, my line of work wouldn't be essential in California (as it is not in other places). Solely on the metric that sex workers can claim to be essential and that their line of work entails a level of close contact that would mandate protections that exceed what any worker besides one in the medical profession might entail, then they would certainly need hazard pay .

And by mourning, you meant a half-hearted shrug? Seriously, though, I stopped seeing him and promptly stopped thinking about him until that thread the other day and I had to think if I had heard anything about him in the meantime.

But seriously, though.... Best Tom: