He came to mind as soon as I saw that article, obviously.
In general that's a valid counter criticism to the crusade against cultural appropriation. On the whole, it's not about just showing appreciation for various cultural contributions because we would all be hypocrites for playing a jazz. Rather, not doing what's necessary to "repay" in kind the people who contribute disproportionately to our culture leads to a wider set of valid issues that guys like cow fucker highlight. The article had one particular point that illustrates this:
The thing is, sharing a Karen meme isn't cultural appropriation - even if it's somewhat unfair by disconnecting the image from the actual person, it's poking fun at a very specific type of personality. The crying Michael Jordan image might also fall into that category simply because Michael Jordan is such a universally known entity that the humor in it is widely recognized as specific to his cult of personality. In general, though, there's a very fine line when it comes to expressing memes that make black men and women appear to be comically exaggerated or buffoonish, especially when it comes to that meme being a representative of the target of humor. While it might mostly be an aside in the larger debate of how to properly give reparations to black people, it nonetheless embodies how white people have a propensity for cacheing cultural icons while simultaneously justifying the theft. To put it another way: no one (well, other than an out right white nationalists) is going to accuse a black person of profiting off a white person by sharing a Karen meme because he or she can't, but a white person can and does profit off of a "bumbling, happy-go-lucky simpleton" simply because of the inherent power differential.