Sieg67

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-21/bomb-threat-called-in-to-ny-court-where-trump-hearing-held

I wouldn't be surprised if the nukes were not properly maintained considering the corruption within their military.

They should have kept his passport.

News is moving fast. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/17/trump-will-surrender-to-face-charges-if-indicted-defense-lawyer-says.html

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-hell-arrested-tuesday-da-eyes-charges-97957944 Trump says his arrest is on Tuesday. It'll be interesting to see what his hardcore supporters will do.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/03/fox-news-is-reportedly-shadowbanning-donald-trump.html?utm_source=flipboard.com&utm_medium=social_acct&utm_campaign=feed-part

I wonder how much of a hit FOX is going to take. It'll be a sizable financial one but would it really be enough to significantly hurt he network? Then there's also the topic of public trust but I can't imagine a lot of viewers even knowing about the lawsuit. Even if they do, it likely won't change their minds because that's the kind of demographic FOX's viewers are. Of course I'd Dominion will take Murdoch along with all of his news networks down but I think the most that will happen is that they'll be a bit more cautious with what misinformation they spread.

Wonder how conservatives would feel when they find out that they'd have to write a new Pledge of Allegiance and change the name of The United States to The Divided States.

Didn't want to make a new thread for this but now there has been a huge explosion at a metal manufacture. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/explosion-rocks-ohio-factory-scattering-molten-metal-14-injured/ar-AA17J6Jc

Also Kevin McCarthy already tried suing for this and the case was rejected.

They voted. It was fair. There was a pandemic. There was even a vote to allow proxies and 77% of Republicans used that option. Who the fuck cares? https://www.cnsnews.com/article/washington/micky-wootten/77-house-republicans-voted-proxy-during-117th-congress

Speaker of the house.

You mean this guy? https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/10/politics/ken-paxton-texas-settlement/index.html Voting by proxy was allowed at the time due to COVID 19. Wow. Much news. So corruption.

I'm starting to wonder if there is a bottom to this well. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-shell-spending-scheme-comes-under-doj-scrutiny?utm_source=web_push

I feel like I'm missing some context.

You don't understand. Packard is being victimized here from the unfair laws that prevents him from negatively effecting people with his bad life decision. This should be world news.

We tried banning alcohol once and we got Nascar. Fucking Nascar.

....You clearly didn't read all of my other post.

Isn't this interesting, oil took a dip starting in 2014 and stayed around that for all of Trumps term. Who was president in 2014 again? You can see how the rise of price correlates with Russia's actions. https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epm0_pte_nus_dpg&f=w

I haven't read the entirety of this thread yet but I want to throw in a few points. Oil prices were down during the Trump administration and this was largely due to the pandemic causing less demand for gas. Less demand=Lower prices. Basic economics. Since there was less demand, the number of distilleries decreased. I wouldn't doubt that Trumps mishandling of the COVID-19 actually helped him in this regard as it made it look like he lowered gas prices. So what happens when everybody suddenly starts going back to work and when people start going out as normal? The demand for gas increases. Unfortunately this happened during Biden's term. Propagandist were already using his stance on how we should handle threats to the environment to push misinformation. I'll address a couple of their talking points. 1)Wind turbine use results in higher gas prices. This would be 100% false. Again, less demand=lower prices so that wouldn't make sense. 2)Biden's rejection of the pipeline increased prices. There are several reasons why this is false. First, it was a pipeline expansion. The main part of the Keystone Pipeline already exists. This pipeline exports tar sands to Canada. It does not distribute oil to other states. I shouldn't have to say this but a pipeline is not an oil rig. They do not produce oil. Currently refineries are in full production and more oil is being pumped out than ever before. Biden isn't rejecting the pipeline extension because "lul windmills." It's because of the proposed area would present a massive environmental hazard. Aside from it's threat to the wildlife in general, it would be stretching over the Ogallala Aquifer which is a massive source of fresh drinking water. We don't want to contaminate that aquifer. Keep in mind that it's not the question of if a pipeline is going to leak, but when and where. Gas prices really shot up during the start of the Ukraine/Russian war. Big oil used this as one excuse to employ a price hike and of course there was the speculation of the stock market. They also capitalized on a certain percentage of the population's perception of Biden to blame him. At this point, we have big oil egregiously raising prices and dropping the blame on the president as they were making record profit. Recently, Biden has been using the reserves to take advantage of the system. Selling high and buying low. This is supposedly aiding in the lowering of prices but conservative media is somehow using this in their hate machine.

China wants their balloon back.... https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/china-says-it-wants-its-busted-balloon-back-after-the-us-navy-fished-the-suspected-spy-craft-out-of-the-ocean/ar-AA17fyVX

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/desantis-florida-venue-liquor-license-drag_n_63decf98e4b0c8e3fc851fc7