Civility is the general category, if you bothered to read the thread. You clearly created an account with someone else's account name from another site and quoted them verbatim from that site to elicit a reaction. There's no particular nuance beyond that which matters.
Tentatively, the draft rules say:
Civility
Don't be toxic. This includes harassment, flaming, starting unnecessary arguments, backhanded or malicious comments, purposefully annoying members or making them uncomfortable, promoting self-harm, etc. If a member asks you to stop bothering them, please do so.
Discrimination and bigotry will not be tolerated. This includes, racism, transphobia/homophobia, religious, ableist, misogyny, and other forms of discrimination, including hate speech or the use of slurs in any context (“ironic” or “joking” instances are not acceptable).
Please be respectful and understanding of the staff team. Respect the decisions made by all staff, they are (mostly) human too. When you are asked to stop, you are expected to listen and not argue about it publicly (use PMs or the Hey Mod! thread). Avoid backseat moderating/mini-modding and avoid tagging staff unless something needs immediate attention.
We recognize this list may not encapsulate every aspect of interpersonal civility. We reserve the right to act as needed or expand this list further.
The whole point of this exercise is that people have been saying for four years we don't have real rules, and that we've been winging it - which is true. And this whole thing is supposed to standardize the decision making to a degree.
If all this boils down to you thinking I can't distinguish between my or my friends' personal opinions and formal decision-making, or that this is a concerted plot to kick you personally off the site, I must be extremely incompetent in your mind given that, if I do whatever I want, I could just spotban you or anyone else without needing to throw away my holiday weekend dealing with your drama.