Master-Debater131

Well theres an interesting twist. Rep Ogles just asked if the Department of Energy is involved in UAPs, and based on the answers it sure sounds like they may be. That could be a way that the Gov is getting around disclosure. If the DoE is handling this, and we are asking the Military for info, they could truthfully answer they are not involved because its the DoE who is handling everything.

Alright, WTF. Gaetz just said that he and other members of Congress basically forced a briefing where he saw images of a UAP that he cant ascribe to any known technology. There were 4 craft that the crew saw and picked up on radar, he saw that Radar image. Hes claiming that the pilot they talked to said that when they approached those 4 craft their tech basically shut down.

AOC with a solid question. Basically asked the witnesses where she should be looking to uncover this coverup. The witnesses offered to give her that information in private. Thats the key to this. You have to know where to look because the Government is going to do everything it can to hide this.

And a witness just testified, under oath, that the US has known since at least the 30s of "Non-Human Intelligence". AND that the US government is funneling money to various US Corporations as part of this program.

Ive been noticing that as well. Its been a theory around for a while where there are things our government does that are "off the books". All you have to do is follow the money and it always ends up with "where the hell did it all go?!" to support that claim. Bureaucracy is inefficient, but not to the tune of trillions of dollars. Congress likes to give away a lot of power, but something tells me this isnt going to be one of those times. I really hope Congress keeps pushing on this and demands reports. Even classified reports to Congress would be better than this total silence.

At this point Im half expecting some Men in Black to walk into the room, say "Yea, were doing this, you cant stop us" and then just walk out.

This testimony has been crazy. And its all under oath. So I really dont buy that these are just nutjobs out there trying to make news. They all seem pretty damn credible to me.

One of the witnesses just claimed that the US Government has in its possession some of these UAPs, and he said he knows the locations based on first hand accounts.

The GOP chair started with some bullshit about the China Balloon and saying its Bidens fault, but the next few people are firing hard. Calling out the intelligence community for flat out refusing to cooperate with the hearings, refusing to give them a classified briefing in a SCIF, and working to change legislation in the FAA authorization bill. Loving what I am hearing from them so far.

https://twitter.com/IGN/status/1684200678170718210

Ive seen the same language. I think theres a couple reasons why, the first is they dont want to use the word "Alien" because of the imagry it inspires. And the other is that it might not be from another world. One theory is that these UAPs are inter-dimensional travelers from another version of Earth. Im not so sure an Alien takeover would be good. One of my fears is a religious alien armada crusading through the universe. Can you imagine if bible thumpers had that kind of tech? I want nothing to do with that reality.

Heres the Guardians live thread if you cant tune into the hearing https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jul/26/ufo-hearing-congress-david-grusch-whistleblower-live-updates

UFOs were long considered "Tinfoil Hat" territory. Well, not anymore. Over the past few months there has been a steady drumbeat of UFO, or UAP as they are now called, news including credible whistleblowers who have accused the US Government of running shadow operations around UAPs. These operations include the tracking down of crashed UAPs. Congress has grown interested enough in these claims that they have a hearing scheduled to start in just a couple of minutes. No one really knows what to expect at this point. At no point has any whistleblower used the term "Alien" but they have said "UFO Pilots". There are some pretty famous UAP videos out there including the Tic Tac video that comes directly from the US Military.

Well for starters TikTok is owned by China and the CCP has mandated a back-door into the program so that they can access the data at any time. That is a HUGE problem. Yes, its not great that Facebook and other social media sites here access our data, but its vastly better than China having access to that. The algorithm it uses also is particularly aggressive. It actively pushes the absolute worst videos out there onto its users. It rapidly pushes people to extremist content, and not just political content either. You girls are aggressively targeted with videos that celebrate and encourage eating disorders. Young men are pushed to vile sexist rhetoric. Its been cited as a reason for an increase in eating disorders, sexist incidents in school, and even suicide. Are the other social media sites innocent? No, not at all. But TikTok has taken the absolute worst of social media and amplified it.

There are A LOT of reasons why TikTok may be the worst social media site out there. None of them are exactly good, but TT seems to be particularly bad.

Oh no, TikTok is so toxic that even Elon wants nothing to do with that

The rebrand is all part of the master plan by Elon to create his "super app" Twitter is now X Then he will launch X Videos to compete with youtube Then X Pictures to compete with pintrest and insta You can access them individually or go to XXX.Com to view them all in the same place at once

If hes going to complain about women having to squat then people should flood his office with SheWees. Thatd piss him off. Sounds like a pretty stand up guy. The kind of guy you want right by your side.....as you run from a bear so you can trip him.

This feels like such an extraordinarily bad idea that regardless of legality it shouldn't even be considered.

If there is one thing that this world is seriously missing its Trailer Trash Micky Mouse.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/21/georgia-trump-charges-fraud-election-2020 Fulton county prosecutors prepare racketeering charges in Trump inquiry "The Fulton county district attorney investigating Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in the state of Georgia has developed evidence to charge a sprawling racketeering indictment next month, according to two people briefed on the matter. The racketeering statute in Georgia requires prosecutors to show the existence of an “enterprise” – and a pattern of racketeering activity that is predicated on at least two “qualifying” crimes." Ive maintained throughout this entire saga that the Georgia case was the more dangerous one for Trump, and I sure was right. This looks like the kind of case that puts people behind bars for quite some time. Racketeering charges are major charges, and you don't bring this kind of case unless you have the evidence to back it up.

Oh he absolutely knows he has Putin over a barrel. He also has a history of fucking with Russia militarily. He shot down a Russian fighter jet that entered into Turkish airspace a while back, so he has a track record of this. He could easily float his entire navy right up to Ukrainian waters and theres not a damn thing that Russia could do about it.

Its not so much that they are intentionally incompetent as they are owned by the same people who own the GOP. When you realize that the GOP and Democrats are both owned by the same people and companies things make a lot more sense. Functionally there isn't really a difference between the two anymore, its all just show. They both are working to make sure that the middle class shrinks, lower class suffers, and their corporate overloads continue to make more money. They just go about it in different ways, but their end goal is the same. "Fuck you" - Congress

Turkey alone has enough navy in the area to make Russia seriously regret this sort of policy

Like I said https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3876 "With the 2024 presidential race potentially pitting a current and former president against each other and more than a dozen other candidates officially seeking their party's presidential nomination, voters are evenly split about voting for a third-party candidate, with 47 percent saying they would consider voting for a third-party candidate in the 2024 presidential election and 47 percent say they would not consider it, according to a Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University national poll released today. Independents say more than 2 to 1 (64 - 30 percent) that they would consider voting for a third-party candidate in the 2024 presidential election while Democrats (61 - 35 percent) and Republicans (57 - 38 percent) say they would not consider it." There is a very clear 3rd party lane opening up thanks to how awful both the Democrat and Republican presumed nominees are.