Not a fan of Tim Poole. He make too many generalizations, and demonizations from too little evidence. He also doesn't really take input at all. He's not as objective as you think. His "objective" is via the "white man's objective" lens, instead of a real objective lens. I prefer a Philip DeFranco over him, because he has conversations with his audience. He give you what he thinks, and gives evidence to prove his point, and responds to his followers in kind, actually giving them a chance to respond (at least on his website outside of YouTube). He has also been known to retract statements he's made in light of evidence against him. I consider him more objective than most YouTube news/reporting channels out there.