Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted

wtf long post is long

 

yah i read all about this

apparently cops can fuck you while you are handcuffed and then say it was consensual and get away with it

the victim is working to change that law in NY

Posted
29 minutes ago, fuggnificent said:

wtf long post is long

 

yah i read all about this

apparently cops can fuck you while you are handcuffed and then say it was consensual and get away with it

the victim is working to change that law in NY

my friend is paralyzed and a cop is fucking his wife

Posted
6 minutes ago, mumbojummie13 said:

my friend is paralyzed and a cop is fucking his wife

ahh shit

well cops are hot

but bitches these days

my friend had TWO strokes before age 35 and his "wife" is fucking everything with legs... his last stroke was on the day she planned to bring her boyfriend to THEIR house when they still lived together. Bitches, man. 

Posted
Just now, fuggnificent said:

ahh shit

well cops are hot

but bitches these days

my friend had TWO strokes before age 35 and his "wife" is fucking everything with legs... his last stroke was on the day she planned to bring her boyfriend to THEIR house when they still lived together. Bitches, man. 

i know i hope at least they are special together.  

Posted
3 hours ago, mumbojummie13 said:

my friend is paralyzed and a cop is fucking his wife

Dude, a thread about cops getting arrested for rape isn't the time to throw in your issues about women. We get it. They did ya wrong and your friends, but I'm never gonna care about it because you never shut the fuck up about it.

Posted

There may be a fine line with what you can and can't do to someone in handcuffs... As someone that has been fucked in handcuffs...I don't think she got paid to do it tho.

Posted
7 hours ago, SorceressPol said:

Dude, a thread about cops getting arrested for rape isn't the time to throw in your issues about women. We get it. They did ya wrong and your friends, but I'm never gonna care about it because you never shut the fuck up about it.

ok you win.

Posted

The governor actually added penal language in response to this in his budget amendments this week.

Without doing any research it looks like it is being added to the statutory rape law. So basically if enacted it means if someone is in custody of an officer, they cannot legally consent and it is by definition rape no matter any other circumstances.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Adminderaptorpat said:

The governor actually added penal language in response to this in his budget amendments this week.

Without doing any research it looks like it is being added to the statutory rape law. So basically if enacted it means if someone is in custody of an officer, they cannot legally consent and it is by definition rape no matter any other circumstances.

thank god.

im sure id be ok but i was scared for my kid and all female relatives

Posted

It still has to pass though. 

A lot of things can happen between now and when the budget is due April 1, and the final budget won't have everything that's in the executive budget proposal (and will have things that aren't in the executive budget proposal).

Posted
19 minutes ago, Adminderaptorpat said:

The governor actually added penal language in response to this in his budget amendments this week.

Without doing any research it looks like it is being added to the statutory rape law. So basically if enacted it means if someone is in custody of an officer, they cannot legally consent and it is by definition rape no matter any other circumstances.

most rapists dont care what the law says.

Posted
2 minutes ago, mumbojummie13 said:

most rapists dont care what the law says.

This is the same conversation I have with illegal gun owners and gun control.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Adminderaptorpat said:

The governor actually added penal language in response to this in his budget amendments this week.

Without doing any research it looks like it is being added to the statutory rape law. So basically if enacted it means if someone is in custody of an officer, they cannot legally consent and it is by definition rape no matter any other circumstances.

its appalling that this even is a thing that has to happen.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Adminderaptorpat said:

The governor actually added penal language in response to this in his budget amendments this week.

Without doing any research it looks like it is being added to the statutory rape law. So basically if enacted it means if someone is in custody of an officer, they cannot legally consent and it is by definition rape no matter any other circumstances.

seriously i got to admit, if its impossible to consent to a cop, there will be more women forced to keep their pants ON

Posted
32 minutes ago, Clu said:

Fuck the enforcement class of this oligarchy.

cuffing someone, and the raping them, is just not normal.  even in criminal psychology, that would amount to kidnapping or something, not just rape.

so this is a particular example, but how far does the abuse of power go?  is it a normal encounter by the way of patrolling to be seduced? 

doesnt that betray a code or oath, to engage in relationships with the people they serve?

Posted
14 minutes ago, mumbojummie13 said:

cuffing someone, and the raping them, is just not normal.  even in criminal psychology, that would amount to kidnapping or something, not just rape.

so this is a particular example, but how far does the abuse of power go?  is it a normal encounter by the way of patrolling to be seduced? 

doesnt that betray a code or oath, to engage in relationships with the people they serve?

Fuck if I know, I was just being a dick.

Posted
2 hours ago, Clu said:

This is just New York tho right?

Yeah, it happened in NYC and blew up in the news at the same time as the state budget starts getting put together, so even though it's not a fiscal thing the Governor decided to add it in.

2 hours ago, mumbojummie13 said:

most rapists dont care what the law says.

And the particular facts of this case have prevented the law from adequately prosecuting the case because the two officers were contesting the victim's absence of consent.

By making this a form of statutory rape, consent is irrelevant to the crime, and it becomes easier to prosecute the defendant charged with the rape of a victim in their custody.

Posted

Custody is key, not cuffs. Cuffs are just an indicator of (but not required for) custody. I don't even really understand what you mean.

Simply put, if you are in "detained or in the custody" of an officer, and that officer has sex with you, it would legally be considered a felony rape regardless of whether you wanted to do it or not. Actual, bona fide custody, not an illegal detainment. Like the officer properly arrests you, and then has sex with you.

What you seem to be talking about is a whole different can of worms.

×
×
  • Create New...