Oh, well this isn't cooked yet.

[1pooh4u]

And now we reach the part of every thread where Packard doesn’t know who he’s talking to anymore 

[naraku360]

Remember when Trump was asked about his limit for how young he'd have sex with?

Yeah, he thinks 12 would be weird.

 

 

 

But not 13-18

[PenguinBoss]

32 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

I was talking to Katt when I brought that up, not you.  Of course, you didn't read the rest of it.

Uh huh, something about Trump unfriending him. I'm sure he stated that a long time ago, long before Epstein's arrest. Just like I'm sure Trump had no idea of the kid diddling while they were close.

Not that I really need to read anything else besides what I'm replying to, considering most of your posts are just non-sequiturs, anyway.

Kudos being able to actually tell two people apart, though.

[1pooh4u]

2 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

Uh huh, something about Trump unfriending him. I'm sure he stated that a long time ago, long before Epstein's arrest. Just like I'm sure Trump had no idea of the kid diddling while they were close.

Not that I really need to read anything else besides what I'm replying to, considering most of your posts are just non-sequiturs, anyway.

Kudos being able to actually tell two people apart, though.

It doesn’t matter that he was able to tell you two apart because it doesn’t matter. He was replying to your comment 😆

[katt_goddess]

23 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

The guy in line ahead of you at the supermaket might be a convicted car thief.  Stop associating with car thieves.

Get the point?  All you're promoting here is guilt by association.  

Was your college professor cooking meth?  You have no way of knowing yes or no on that, do you?  If he had done any of that and gets arrested for it, does that mean you were in business with him?

 

Yes, according to your own line of thinking, because you were seen in the same classroom with him.

 

 

It's only associating if I get in the car with him after picking up a bag of kitten kibbles. 

Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, 30+ times in a private jet that I then somehow come into possession of to use to go to all my ego rallies hoping that no one remembers that the jet I'm using was used to traffick underaged children to rape parties. 

Meth has a smell when it's being cooked and it gets into things. I'd know if one of my frickin' professors had been the prototype for 'Breaking Bad', Sgt Schultz. And I'd only be in business with him if I also smelled of sweat and mentholated cat piss 24/7 with fields of picked zits and a pocket full of teeth. 

Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, if a birthday card was found that I had written directly to him praising him for having great taste in underaged secrets. 

[1pooh4u]

[lupin_bebop]

On 7/25/2025 at 11:35 PM, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

I make no distinctions. 

………You peaked in middle school, didn’t you?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

13 hours ago, katt_goddess said:

It's only associating if I get in the car with him after picking up a bag of kitten kibbles. 

Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, 30+ times in a private jet that I then somehow come into possession of to use to go to all my ego rallies hoping that no one remembers that the jet I'm using was used to traffick underaged children to rape parties. 

Meth has a smell when it's being cooked and it gets into things. I'd know if one of my frickin' professors had been the prototype for 'Breaking Bad', Sgt Schultz. And I'd only be in business with him if I also smelled of sweat and mentholated cat piss 24/7 with fields of picked zits and a pocket full of teeth. 

Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, if a birthday card was found that I had written directly to him praising him for having great taste in underaged secrets. 

Wake me up when he's indicted on those charges.  Until then, you're only arguing on conjecture.

[naraku360]

 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

48 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

 

All this from a guy with a barbed wire beard, endorsing shaving products.

[naraku360]

13 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

All this from a guy with a barbed wire beard, endorsing shaving products.

You don't have to reply if you have nothing of value to say.

[katt_goddess]

5 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Wake me up when he's indicted on those charges.  Until then, you're only arguing on conjecture.

What the hell do you think he's trying to prevent happening with all his current wacky waving inflatable tube man bullshit? 

Did you salt those lead chips first or just eat them plain?  

[PenguinBoss]

Packard pretending he'd accept indictments/convictions in good faith is hilarious.

[1pooh4u]

39 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

Packard pretending he'd accept indictments/convictions in good faith is hilarious.

Right?!? Considering he  went from “he didn’t have a trial he was railroaded (he had a trial) and now we’re at “wake me when he’s indicted on pedo charges” the charges Trump became president to avoid 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

10 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

Right?!? Considering he  went from “he didn’t have a trial he was railroaded (he had a trial) and now we’re at “wake me when he’s indicted on pedo charges” the charges Trump became president to avoid 

For a charge as serious as that, the bar of evidence is raised.  It's not like a civil trial where rumor, smear and slander are handed up as evidence.

[PenguinBoss]

22 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

For a charge as serious as that, the bar of evidence is raised.  It's not like a civil trial where rumor, smear and slander are handed up as evidence.

How do you feel about the 34 convictions in his hush money trial?

[1pooh4u]

2 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

For a charge as serious as that, the bar of evidence is raised.  It's not like a civil trial where rumor, smear and slander are handed up as evidence.

Like the 34 felony convictions he received in his criminal trial or are you just talking out your ass again?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

3 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

Like the 34 felony convictions he received in his criminal trial or are you just talking out your ass again?

Let me ask you something about the 34 felony convictions.  One of those involved the so-called "hush money" case to Stormy Daniels.

Okay, so how is a non disclosure agreement illegal at all, let alone a felony?

[SwimOdin]

Where would you let him finish on you?

[André Toulon]

[[classic swim]]

@GunStarHero please laugh passionately at his head.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, SwimOdin said:

Where would you let him finish on you?

Let who finish what?

[André Toulon]

[lupin_bebop]

21 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Wake me up when he's indicted on those charges.  Until then, you're only arguing on conjecture.

He was *convicted* on charges…..34 of them, last time I checked.

Before you spout some bullshit about “NDA is not illegal,” yes, it is when it’s used to cover up crimes, especially *FEDERAL* crimes. That makes the NDA not only illegal, but also voids the paper as a contract. 
Also, HE broke the fucking NDA, because he couldn’t keep his fucking mouth shut.

Source: My grandmother, an attorney. Specialty: Contract law. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

6 minutes ago, lupin_bebop said:

He was *convicted* on charges…..34 of them, last time I checked.

Before you spout some bullshit about “NDA is not illegal,” yes, it is when it’s used to cover up crimes, especially *FEDERAL* crimes. That makes the NDA not only illegal, but also voids the paper as a contract. 
Also, HE broke the fucking NDA, because he couldn’t keep his fucking mouth shut.

Source: My grandmother, an attorney. Specialty: Contract law. 

What crime was covered up?  An NDA in a court settlement has to be approved by a judge.

[naraku360]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Let who finish what?

 

[SwimOdin]

47 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

What crime was covered up?  An NDA in a court settlement has to be approved by a judge.

This is something you could easily answer for yourself just by looking. This is a false premise of ignorance, so shut the fuck up.  You lost any presumption you were arguing on the merits of YOUR OWN argument a long time ago.

[1pooh4u]

10 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Let me ask you something about the 34 felony convictions.  One of those involved the so-called "hush money" case to Stormy Daniels.

Okay, so how is a non disclosure agreement illegal at all, let alone a felony?

The $ wasn’t the issue it was covering up who the $ went to and falsifying records that was the crime but that doesn’t matter. You said trials don’t count if there’s no jury. Well now suck it fucker cuz 12 jurors decided the outcome. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

35 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

The $ wasn’t the issue it was covering up who the $ went to and falsifying records that was the crime but that doesn’t matter. You said trials don’t count if there’s no jury. Well now suck it fucker cuz 12 jurors decided the outcome. 

Which records have been falsified?

[1pooh4u]

25 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Which records have been falsified?

Google mother fucker. Use it or stfu 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

9 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

Google mother fucker. Use it or stfu 

Oh, so it's just like after I sued my employer (now, former employer) for the back injury and the payout was likely chalked up as a business expense.  One disgruntled worker is part of the cost of doing business.  Got it.

This is why Trump's game is now under an appeal.

Edited 15 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[PenguinBoss]

Interesting that Packard had info at the ready for the civil suit, but he's acting like this is the first time he's heard of the criminal trial.

Glenn Beck must have skipped over it or something.

[1pooh4u]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Oh, so it's just like after I sued my employer (now, former employer) for the back injury and the payout was likely chalked up as a business expense.  One disgruntled worker is part of the cost of doing business.  Got it.

This is why Trump's game is now under an appeal.

Stfu, idiot 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

Just now, 1pooh4u said:

Stfu, idiot 

Are you saying it's not under appeal?

[1pooh4u]

2 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Are you saying it's not under appeal?

I’m saying every criminal conviction gets appealed so STFU you idiot 

[naraku360]

38 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Are you saying it's not under appeal?

Trump, known for his impeccable record of always taking personal responsibility for his wrongdoing, appealed a court decision?

Well, he must be innocent.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

42 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

I’m saying every criminal conviction gets appealed so STFU you idiot 

If the appeals judge sees the case as it really is and won't participate in a witch hunt, you could end up seeing all those convictions overturned.

[naraku360]

8 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

If the appeals judge sees the case as it really is and won't participate in a witch hunt, you could end up seeing all those convictions overturned.

So, the court is literally only valid if they agree with you?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 minute ago, naraku360 said:

So, the court is literally only valid if they agree with you?

There's a difference between a trial and getting railroaded.

[naraku360]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

There's a difference between a trial and getting railroaded.

And you're saying that if the appeals court upholds the ruling, it's physically impossible for it to be legitimate.

Which is a retarded thing to say 

[PenguinBoss]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

There's a difference between a trial and getting railroaded.

Yeah, and it seems to depend solely on who you support.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 minute ago, PenguinBoss said:

Yeah, and it seems to depend solely on who you support.

You might want to start listening to the opening statements from his lawyers.

[1pooh4u]

14 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

If the appeals judge sees the case as it really is and won't participate in a witch hunt, you could end up seeing all those convictions overturned.

Considering he hired the “best” lawyers it’s not likely that a judge will overturn all 34 convictions. 

[1pooh4u]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You might want to start listening to the opening statements from his lawyers.

You are the dumbest fuck in all the land 

[PenguinBoss]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You might want to start listening to the opening statements from his lawyers.

It sounds like you're saying his argument isn't "I didn't do these things" but "The courts are being mean to me, so you should find me not guilty."

[MasqueradeOverture]

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 minute ago, PenguinBoss said:

It sounds like you're saying his argument isn't "I didn't do these things" but "The courts are being mean to me, so you should find me not guilty."

Or, maybe he did something that isn't really a crime.

Look at his overvaluation of Mari Lago, for example.  He wanted a loan and the estate was offered as collateral.  At that point, the lender was supposed to run the due diligence in verifying the estate's value.  They didn't.  The loan was approved.

Did Don default on the loan?  Had the lender been cheated in any way?  No.  Everything was paid, as agreed and yes, the lenders did say so.  That means that no crime (fraud) had taken place in that instance.  

Me?  Well, I have a copper Zippo, new in the case with its original seal.  I could try to collatteralize it for a $280k loan.  So, if I do, it's the lender's obligation to look at what similar items had actually sold for.  ($25 to $65).  If the lender approves the loan without doing the homework, there's no fraud on my part unless I default.

[1pooh4u]

Dum-dum dummy r-tard shit 

[naraku360]

On 7/27/2025 at 4:11 PM, Sieg67 said:

So naraku...any reason why you're in this picture?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

17 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

All this and you can't point out what's wrong with what I just said.

Let me simplify it for you.  Overvaluing your collateral is not a crime unless the lender has been chested.