1pooh4u Posted Tuesday at 03:43 AM Posted Tuesday at 03:43 AM And now we reach the part of every thread where Packard doesn’t know who he’s talking to anymore 6 Quote
naraku360 Posted Tuesday at 03:44 AM Posted Tuesday at 03:44 AM Remember when Trump was asked about his limit for how young he'd have sex with? Yeah, he thinks 12 would be weird. But not 13-18 3 Quote
PenguinBoss Posted Tuesday at 04:03 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:03 AM 32 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: I was talking to Katt when I brought that up, not you. Of course, you didn't read the rest of it. Uh huh, something about Trump unfriending him. I'm sure he stated that a long time ago, long before Epstein's arrest. Just like I'm sure Trump had no idea of the kid diddling while they were close. Not that I really need to read anything else besides what I'm replying to, considering most of your posts are just non-sequiturs, anyway. Kudos being able to actually tell two people apart, though. 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted Tuesday at 04:06 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:06 AM 2 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said: Uh huh, something about Trump unfriending him. I'm sure he stated that a long time ago, long before Epstein's arrest. Just like I'm sure Trump had no idea of the kid diddling while they were close. Not that I really need to read anything else besides what I'm replying to, considering most of your posts are just non-sequiturs, anyway. Kudos being able to actually tell two people apart, though. It doesn’t matter that he was able to tell you two apart because it doesn’t matter. He was replying to your comment 😆 2 Quote
katt_goddess Posted yesterday at 02:03 AM Posted yesterday at 02:03 AM 23 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: The guy in line ahead of you at the supermaket might be a convicted car thief. Stop associating with car thieves. Get the point? All you're promoting here is guilt by association. Was your college professor cooking meth? You have no way of knowing yes or no on that, do you? If he had done any of that and gets arrested for it, does that mean you were in business with him? Yes, according to your own line of thinking, because you were seen in the same classroom with him. It's only associating if I get in the car with him after picking up a bag of kitten kibbles. Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, 30+ times in a private jet that I then somehow come into possession of to use to go to all my ego rallies hoping that no one remembers that the jet I'm using was used to traffick underaged children to rape parties. Meth has a smell when it's being cooked and it gets into things. I'd know if one of my frickin' professors had been the prototype for 'Breaking Bad', Sgt Schultz. And I'd only be in business with him if I also smelled of sweat and mentholated cat piss 24/7 with fields of picked zits and a pocket full of teeth. Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, if a birthday card was found that I had written directly to him praising him for having great taste in underaged secrets. 4 Quote
lupin_bebop Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago On 7/25/2025 at 11:35 PM, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: I make no distinctions. ………You peaked in middle school, didn’t you? 2 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago 13 hours ago, katt_goddess said: It's only associating if I get in the car with him after picking up a bag of kitten kibbles. Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, 30+ times in a private jet that I then somehow come into possession of to use to go to all my ego rallies hoping that no one remembers that the jet I'm using was used to traffick underaged children to rape parties. Meth has a smell when it's being cooked and it gets into things. I'd know if one of my frickin' professors had been the prototype for 'Breaking Bad', Sgt Schultz. And I'd only be in business with him if I also smelled of sweat and mentholated cat piss 24/7 with fields of picked zits and a pocket full of teeth. Or in the case of the Pedo-Pals, if a birthday card was found that I had written directly to him praising him for having great taste in underaged secrets. Wake me up when he's indicted on those charges. Until then, you're only arguing on conjecture. 1 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago 48 minutes ago, naraku360 said: All this from a guy with a barbed wire beard, endorsing shaving products. 1 Quote
naraku360 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 13 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: All this from a guy with a barbed wire beard, endorsing shaving products. You don't have to reply if you have nothing of value to say. 5 Quote
katt_goddess Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 5 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: Wake me up when he's indicted on those charges. Until then, you're only arguing on conjecture. What the hell do you think he's trying to prevent happening with all his current wacky waving inflatable tube man bullshit? Did you salt those lead chips first or just eat them plain? 1 5 Quote
PenguinBoss Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Packard pretending he'd accept indictments/convictions in good faith is hilarious. 2 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 39 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said: Packard pretending he'd accept indictments/convictions in good faith is hilarious. Right?!? Considering he went from “he didn’t have a trial he was railroaded (he had a trial) and now we’re at “wake me when he’s indicted on pedo charges” the charges Trump became president to avoid 2 Quote
The Evil Dr. Longshadow Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago 10 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Right?!? Considering he went from “he didn’t have a trial he was railroaded (he had a trial) and now we’re at “wake me when he’s indicted on pedo charges” the charges Trump became president to avoid For a charge as serious as that, the bar of evidence is raised. It's not like a civil trial where rumor, smear and slander are handed up as evidence. 1 Quote
PenguinBoss Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 22 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: For a charge as serious as that, the bar of evidence is raised. It's not like a civil trial where rumor, smear and slander are handed up as evidence. How do you feel about the 34 convictions in his hush money trial? 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said: For a charge as serious as that, the bar of evidence is raised. It's not like a civil trial where rumor, smear and slander are handed up as evidence. Like the 34 felony convictions he received in his criminal trial or are you just talking out your ass again? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.