China has a beef with American beef.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

Just now, 1pooh4u said:

There isn’t sawdust in Kraft Parmesan cheese.  There’s no wood or wood pulp. There’s cellulose in Kraft cheese, a refined plant product.  It’s used as an anti caking agent. 

What... plant?  Scrub oak and pine are plants, too.

[1pooh4u]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

What... plant?  Scrub oak and pine are plants, too.

Being derived from wood pulp doesn’t mean it actually contains wood pulp. It’s from the walls of the plant cells not the tree bark or anything that would be considered wood by the time the refining process is over 

[1pooh4u]

The issue isn’t the “wood” it’s claiming to be 100% cheese when there’s an additive to prevent caking 

[PenguinBoss]

11 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Or, just a small part of the truth showed up and Google shot it before it got out the door.  Happens often.

Can't believe Big Sawdust controls what small start-up Google puts in results.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said:

There isn’t sawdust in Kraft Parmesan cheese.  There’s no wood or wood pulp. There’s cellulose in Kraft cheese, a refined plant product, derived from wood. It’s used as an anti caking agent. 
 

the issue is Kraft saying it’s 100% cheese when it isn’t. The cellulose isn’t poison and it won’t kill you. 

Pinalen is also derived from wood.  I still pity any fool who decides to drink it.

[[classic swim]]

15 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

It's already in your grated parmesan. 

Was taking a break from the dial but I contacted Olive Garden just to share your info.

[scoobdog]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Pinalen is also derived from wood.  I still pity any fool who decides to drink it.

You do realize you’ve probably ingested something that utilizes cellulose today, right?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

10 minutes ago, scoobdog said:

You do realize you’ve probably ingested something that utilizes cellulose today, right?

It's not the cellulose itself, it's the source.

Like, you can extract vitamins from turnips, but you can also extract them from sources that are not edible.

And for the record, I didn't eat anything at all since 11pm last night.  Not hungry, yet.

Edited 16 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[1pooh4u]

21 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

It's not the cellulose itself, it's the source.

Like, you can extract vitamins from turnips, but you can also extract them from sources that are not edible.

And for the record, I didn't eat anything at all since 11pm last night.  Not hungry, yet.

The source doesn’t matter 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

9 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

The source doesn’t matter 

You just go ahead and keep thinking that.

[scoobdog]

13 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You just go ahead and keep thinking that.

We will because we’re not retarded.

[1pooh4u]

20 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You just go ahead and keep thinking that.

No it doesn’t really when it comes to making anti clumping agents because the end result is relatively the same.  The effectiveness of the end product might differ but it’s not like one type is more edible than the other in terms of taste. It’s not like eating bread from Subway that has the same shit in it that’s used to make yoga mats. 

[1pooh4u]

lol this thread is about China rejecting American beef 🙄

on second thought, this is fine. Keep the nonsense to your own threads and we don’t have a problem 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

3 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

No it doesn’t really when it comes to making anti clumping agents because the end result is relatively the same.  The effectiveness of the end product might differ but it’s not like one type is more edible than the other in terms of taste. It’s not like eating bread from Subway that has the same shit in it that’s used to make yoga mats. 

Yeah... DATEM is a whole other story.  I avoid that stuff like a brown recluse bite, no matter what it's in.

[André Toulon]

4 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

So, when you think the age of an article makes a difference as though the truth comes with a spoilage date, check out something more recent, May of 2025.

 

https://kitchenjournal.net/how-much-saw-dust-is-in-kraft-parmesan-cheese/

I clicked that and instantly encountered malware. This is why i dont click your shit...you went all the way into the asscrack of the internet just to prove yourself wrong 

[André Toulon]

2 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

It's not the cellulose itself, it's the source.

Like, you can extract vitamins from turnips, but you can also extract them from sources that are not edible.

And for the record, I didn't eat anything at all since 11pm last night.  Not hungry, yet.

Crackhead shit

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

6 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

I clicked that and instantly encountered malware. This is why i dont click your shit...you went all the way into the asscrack of the internet just to prove yourself wrong 

I didn't have any problem with it.  The malware was probably already in your phone from someplace else.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

6 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Crackhead shit

What makes it crack head?  I've been this way for more than fifty years.  I eat when I'm hungry and don't eat when I'm not hungry.

That's part of why I'm not a grotesque blubber monster on an electric wheelchair.

[André Toulon]

7 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

What makes it crack head?  I've been this way for more than fifty years.  I eat when I'm hungry and don't eat when I'm not hungry.

That's part of why I'm not a grotesque blubber monster on an electric wheelchair.

How man cigs have you smoked since 11pm last night

[Insipid]

6 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

What makes it crack head?  I've been this way for more than fifty years.  I eat when I'm hungry and don't eat when I'm not hungry.

That's part of why I'm not a grotesque blubber monster on an electric wheelchair.

I have to say, that is something you should be proud of. Americans are disgustingly fat in general.

meh, take this rare compliment.

[André Toulon]

11 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

I didn't have any problem with it.  The malware was probably already in your phone from someplace else.

Yeah, because blog sites are notoriously secure...let continue down stupid lane....i do enjoy the culture here 

[scoobdog]

33 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

What makes it crack head?  I've been this way for more than fifty years.  I eat when I'm hungry and don't eat when I'm not hungry.

That's part of why I'm not a grotesque blubber monster on an electric wheelchair.

So you’re saying there was a time when you weren’t this way.

[scoobdog]

26 minutes ago, Insipid said:

I have to say, that is something you should be proud of. Americans are disgustingly fat in general.

meh, take this rare compliment.

Crack does have its benefits.  You can eat all the worst shit and never gain a pound.

[scoobdog]

I also hear crackheads can eat wood chips and have not feel them tearing their insides apart.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

29 minutes ago, scoobdog said:

So you’re saying there was a time when you weren’t this way.

Prior to that, I ate every time my parents cooked something.  All I learned from it is that scheduled meals are an unnecessary hassle.

[naraku360]

1 hour ago, André Toulon said:

I clicked that and instantly encountered malware. This is why i dont click your shit...you went all the way into the asscrack of the internet just to prove yourself wrong 

The author's name is 1 letter placement away from Robert Asshurt.

[naraku360]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

The malware was probably already in your phone from someplace else.

Nah, he said he doesn't click your links.

[André Toulon]

38 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Prior to that, I ate every time my parents cooked something.  All I learned from it is that scheduled meals are an unnecessary hassle.

....so to counter that, you eat at employee break time🤔

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

14 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

....so to counter that, you eat at employee break time🤔

My breaks were any time I wanted one and it wasn't always about eating.

[naraku360]

1 minute ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

My breaks were any time I wanted one and it was always about masturbating to lolis in a closet.

Dude, wtf?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

Just now, naraku360 said:

Dude, wtf?

You protest too much.

[naraku360]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You protest too much.

No, protesting too much looks a like this

 

40 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Sure... It seems like everybody who had even delivered bagels and cream cheese to those parties is under some kind of scrutiny.  

 

Look, if Democrats could even leak a SCOTUS decision long before its scheduled publish date, why have they NOT leaked anything about Trump and his little rich vagrant acquaintance yet?

 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

5 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

No, protesting too much looks a like this

 

 

If Trump is actually guilty of anything, let's hear it.

[PenguinBoss]

23 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

If Trump is actually guilty of anything, let's hear it.

Sexual assault

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

Just now, PenguinBoss said:

Sexual assault

Substantive proof or just random rumors?

[André Toulon]

39 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

My breaks were any time I wanted one and it wasn't always about eating.

Not talking about YOUR breaks

...but you know that

[PenguinBoss]

4 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Substantive proof or just random rumors?

Only in a court of law. I know that doesn't mean much to you.

[André Toulon]

5 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Substantive proof or just random rumors?

Why....why do you say shit like this.

I just gave you too much credit...you have no clue whats happening 

[naraku360]

7 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Substantive proof or just random rumors?

Court rulings.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

56 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

Court rulings.

From biased judges who kept all of the evidence in his favor off the record.  Nice try.

 

If you're going to shop around, looking for a judge who had already decided on the case before any procedings have started, you can convict an elm tree of sexual assault.

Edited 10 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[naraku360]

11 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

From biased judges who kept all of the evidence in his favor off the record.  Nice try.

 

If you're going to shop around, looking for a judge who had already decided on the case before any procedings have started, you can convict an elm tree of sexual assault.

 

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You protest too much.

 

[naraku360]

The biased judge:

 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

Just now, naraku360 said:

The biased judge:

 

The jury in this case was deliberately lied to and misled by the judge, and the prosecuter while Don and his lawyers were barely allowed to say yes or no at their own trial.

[naraku360]

15 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

The jury in this case was deliberately lied to and misled by the judge, and the prosecuter while Don and his lawyers were barely allowed to say yes or no at their own trial.

Prove it 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, naraku360 said:

Prove it 

How about the fact that this wasn't a criminal trial?  The bar is set much lower in civil trials than criminal trials in terms of evidence rules.

 

That, and why did the judge refuse Don's offer of DNA evidence?

Edited 8 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[discolé monade]

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

The jury in this case was deliberately lied to and misled by the judge, and the prosecuter while Don and his lawyers were barely allowed to say yes or no at their own trial.

 

Edited 8 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

2 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

 

1 hour ago, naraku360 said:

Prove it 

Why did the judge refuse Don's offer of DNA evidence?

[naraku360]

19 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How about the fact that this wasn't a criminal trial?  The bar is set much lower in civil trials than criminal trials in terms of evidence rules.

 

That, and why did the judge refuse Don's offer of DNA evidence?

Citations needed.

[katt_goddess]

2 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

From biased judges who kept all of the evidence in his favor off the record.  Nice try.

 

If you're going to shop around, looking for a judge who had already decided on the case before any procedings have started, you can convict an elm tree of sexual assault.

Not really. 

The judge in one of those cases did allow that because Princess Tinyhands does in fact have a confirmed micro penis, they could consider sexual assault and rape with actual penetration to be two separate clauses. 

If you want to talk about biased judges, you'll need to explain why everything horrible from republicans pushing for horrible things are shopped to a single set of judges in Texas regardless of where the real mess is taking place. Or how about anything in Florida going to a bleached blond bimbo who thinks there's nothing wrong with stanning for a convicted felon and avid friend of Epstein no matter what the charges.