Good shopping, today

[discolé monade]

this is a bolt

on a bolt action (LOL) shotgun

 

 

 

looking at your combat image, your bolt, is not present, even IF on the 'right side' (as is would sit) 

the trough that holds the bold is not present and or accounted for, recruit. 

your uniform is much too large for you.

 recruit, you are a shitbird. 

Edited yesterday at 06:28 PM by discolé monade
back and forth between soldier and recruit. but let's face it. her height alone would have disqualied her bitch ass from service.

[1pooh4u]

6 minutes ago, [classic swim] said:

 

Pot meet kettle dicksuck

He doesn’t understand what’s happening in this thread.  he lacks self awareness 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said:

I don’t have any issues with my reading comprehension but you sure seem to. You claimed that coffee is a soft drink because casino bar regulations make them list it that way.  So show me or stfu and GTFO 

The casino and alcohol regulators do not concern themselves with soft drinks of any sort, coffee or otherwise.  That's why coffee is listed separately from the alcohol list on the very same page as the soft drinks.

[1pooh4u]

10 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

The casino and alcohol regulators do not concern themselves with soft drinks of any sort, coffee or otherwise.  That's why coffee is listed separately from the alcohol list on the very same page as the soft drinks.

That’s not what you said. You said the regulators require it.  Show me. 
 

now it’s on the same page as the soft drinks therefore coffee is a soft drink? Is that what you’re claiming?  That because something is on the same page as something else, that makes them the same thing?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

11 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

That’s not what you said. You said the regulators require it.  Show me. 
 

now it’s on the same page as the soft drinks therefore coffee is a soft drink? Is that what you’re claiming?  That because something is on the same page as something else, that makes them the same thing?

That's precisely what I have been trying to tell you for several pages of this thread.  You just simply did not comprehend that complying with the law that was posted is NOT POSSIBLE without such categorization and is therefore required.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

45 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

this is a bolt

on a bolt action (LOL) shotgun

 

 

 

looking at your combat image, your bolt, is not present, even IF on the 'right side' (as is would sit) 

the trough that holds the bold is not present and or accounted for, recruit. 

your uniform is much too large for you.

 recruit, you are a shitbird. 

So, now you claim to have xray vision.

 

Good job.

[stilgar]

15 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

That's precisely what I have been trying to tell you for several pages of this thread.  You just simply did not comprehend that complying with the law that was posted is NOT POSSIBLE without such categorization and is therefore required.

No it ain't shit face.

[André Toulon]

Poor Gemini....It is having the hardest time trying to rationalize this. 

[discolé monade]

 buddy took this shit to the next level. 

 

[André Toulon]

1 hour ago, discolé monade said:

 

your uniform is much too large for you.

 

Obviously it's clothing he pilfered from the lost and found, which is hilarious if you consider he's proudly glazed his "tailor" on these boards who always makes sure his clothing fits 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

14 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

So you admit to lying during the application process 

Insurance doesn't have anything to do with the union pension plan and no part of the application had asked for it.

[discolé monade]

4 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Obviously it's clothing he pilfered from the lost and found, which is hilarious if you consider he's proudly glazed his "tailor" on these boards who always makes sure his clothing fits 

lol...i forgot about the corner taylor.  right next to where he gets the soles resoled on his shoes before he heads to the boardwalk for a couple of dime burgers and a nice fat rock. 

Edited yesterday at 07:39 PM by discolé monade

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

5 hours ago, naraku360 said:

Prove it 

Prove what?  That I never said it was missing the bolt?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

10 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

lol...i forgot about the corner taylor.  right next to where he gets the soles resoled on his shoes before he heads to the boardwalk for a couple of dime burgers and a nice fat rock. 

Has it ever occurred to you that having my hems slop over my shoes is my preference, even when buying new from a retail outlet?

[André Toulon]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Has it ever occurred to you that having my hems slop over my shoes is my preference, even when buying new from a retail outlet?

So you want to dress like a rapper from the 90s.

Weird flex, but ok

[André Toulon]

I'm sorry....show us the new Skagen, pls.

[André Toulon]

4 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

So you want to dress like a rapper from the 90s.

Weird flex, but ok

And I truly take this back, even this kids back then knew to cuff their oversized pants so they didnt look like crackheads

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

5 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

So you want to dress like a rapper from the 90s.

Weird flex, but ok

Been this way since 1979 and It's not going to change.  I wear whatever I like regardless of what the fashion trends are.

[naraku360]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Been this way since 1979 and It's not going to change.

Stupid4Lyfe!

[André Toulon]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Been this way since 1979 and It's not going to change.  I wear whatever I like regardless of what the fashion trends are.

And all this time I've been calling you racist...when deep down

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

24 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Obviously it's clothing he pilfered from the lost and found, which is hilarious if you consider he's proudly glazed his "tailor" on these boards who always makes sure his clothing fits 

Lost & Found is an entirely separate department from the bellmans station and I never had access to the Lost & Found storage room, let alone steal anything from it.  We have already discussed that numerous times.

 

Second, the bellmans station will only hold UNCLAIMED luggage for a maximum of 90 days, after which it will be either sold, discarded or given away at the mananager's discression, as per company policy as well as whatever the company's lawyers know about such circumstances.

There's no theft involved.

[1pooh4u]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

That's precisely what I have been trying to tell you for several pages of this thread.  You just simply did not comprehend that complying with the law that was posted is NOT POSSIBLE without such categorization and is therefore required.

SHOW ME THE LAW THEY ARE COMPLYING WITH THAT MAGICALLY MAKES COFFEE A SOFT DRINK. IM NOT YELLING IM JUST USING CAPS TO HELP YOU SEE BETTER 

You heard it here people. Coffee is a soft drink because casino bars list it on the same page as soft drinks. Not because regulators require it but because the regulations make them do it. A regulation he can’t show me because it doesn’t exist but it does because Packard says so. 
 

Hope that clears everything up 🙄

again, show me the NJ regulations that are making casino bars list sales of alcohol vs soft drinks, making coffee a soft drink to the entire country. The world, even. 
 

Look a cat and dog on the same page. That means they’re the same!

[1pooh4u]

37 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Insurance doesn't have anything to do with the union pension plan and no part of the application had asked for it.

So you admit you don’t have insurance 

[André Toulon]

6 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Lost & Found is an entirely separate department from the bellmans station and I never had access to the Lost & Found storage room, let alone steal anything from it.  We have already discussed that numerous times.

 

Second, the bellmans station will only hold UNCLAIMED luggage for a maximum of 90 days, after which it will be either sold, discarded or given away at the mananager's discression, as per company policy as well as whatever the company's lawyers know about such circumstances.

There's no theft involved.

You've just been lying this entire thread, but now im supposed to believe something this made up. Your folly is believing we are all as dumb as you.

[1pooh4u]

Packard. He does what he wants 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

41 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

You've just been lying this entire thread, but now im supposed to believe something this made up. Your folly is believing we are all as dumb as you.

Go to any hotel at all in the United States and you're going to get very similar stories.  They don't have the resources to hold your luggage in perpetuity.  Eventually, they need to get rid of it, by any means necessary.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

46 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

So you admit you don’t have insurance 

I have insurance and the union didn't ask about it.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

49 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

SHOW ME THE LAW THEY ARE COMPLYING WITH THAT MAGICALLY MAKES COFFEE A SOFT DRINK. IM NOT YELLING IM JUST USING CAPS TO HELP YOU SEE BETTER 

You heard it here people. Coffee is a soft drink because casino bars list it on the same page as soft drinks. Not because regulators require it but because the regulations make them do it. A regulation he can’t show me because it doesn’t exist but it does because Packard says so. 
 

Hope that clears everything up 🙄

again, show me the NJ regulations that are making casino bars list sales of alcohol vs soft drinks, making coffee a soft drink to the entire country. The world, even. 
 

Look a cat and dog on the same page. That means they’re the same!

How does such an imbecile as yourself even manage to tie your own shoes?

[André Toulon]

28 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Go to any hotel at all in the United States and you're going to get very similar stories.  They don't have the resources to hold your luggage in perpetuity.  Eventually, they need to get rid of it, by any means necessary.

So you are indeed wearing hand me downs that are too big for you as an independent, perpetually wealthy individual and not as a crackhead?

Edited yesterday at 09:27 PM by André Toulon

[discolé monade]

2 hours ago, 1pooh4u said:

CRAckard. He does what he wants 

fixed

[discolé monade]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How does such an imbecile as yourself even manage to tie your own shoes?

that's funny,  some of us don't quite understand the life problems  you encounter. and how you just can't seem to manage them.

Edited 23 hours ago by discolé monade

[1pooh4u]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How does such an imbecile as yourself even manage to tie your own shoes?

I’m the imbecile? Those were your words. You can’t show the regulations you claim exist and you’re saying coffee is a soft drink because it’s on the same page as soft drinks on some imaginary list.  
 

how are you even still alive right now when you can’t even throw garbage out without killing your back? 😆

[1pooh4u]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

I have insurance and the union didn't ask about it.

So you admit you’re an idiot and pay $430 a month instead of paying a $695 yearly penalty?

[Insipid]

2 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

So you admit you’re an idiot and pay $430 a month instead of paying a $695 yearly penalty?

lol, I think he knows the smoking related health complications are coming.

[discolé monade]

1 minute ago, Insipid said:

lol, I think he knows the smoking related health complications are coming.

[1pooh4u]

12 minutes ago, Insipid said:

lol, I think he knows the smoking related health complications are coming.

His end will probably come from attempting to board a bus before the smoking has a chance to get him 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

3 hours ago, André Toulon said:

I'm sorry....show us the new Skagen, pls.

 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

26 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

So you admit you’re an idiot and pay $430 a month instead of paying a $695 yearly penalty?

The penalty is only a very small portion of what being without insurance would cost me.  I take meds and they have to be covered.  I don't want to pay full price for every refill.  That alone would cost far more than what I'm paying for insurance premiums.

Also, keep in mind other things such as the MRI on my back, the regular doctor visits or even any possibility of landing in a hospital.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, André Toulon said:

So you are indeed wearing hand me downs that are too big for you as an independent, perpetually wealthy individual and not as a crackhead?

I have a mixed wardrobe of clothes bought new and clothes bought at thrift stores.  In BOTH cases, I very much PREFER to have the legs of the slacks or jeans two inches longer than my actual inseam size.  

I do not want my socks to show when I sit down, because it gives an appearance that the jeans or slacks have shrunk in the wash.

 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

42 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

I’m the imbecile? Those were your words. You can’t show the regulations you claim exist and you’re saying coffee is a soft drink because it’s on the same page as soft drinks on some imaginary list.  
 

how are you even still alive right now when you can’t even throw garbage out without killing your back? 😆

Whenever any action is unavoidably necessary in order to comply with a law, the action itself is in fact required by the law.

That works with every law you could possibly name, even traffic laws.

Example:  The law says, "Stop for a red light".  The law does NOT say, "Press the brakes".  Notice that the stop mandate can not be obeyed UNTIL... YOU... PRESS... THE... BRAKES?

Therefore, pressing the brakes for a red light is in fact required by the law, even when it is not specifically spelled out for you verbatem in the law that is written.

[André Toulon]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

I have a mixed wardrobe of clothes bought new and clothes bought at thrift stores.  In BOTH cases, I very much PREFER to have the legs of the slacks or jeans two inches longer than my actual inseam size.  

I do not want my socks to show when I sit down, because it gives an appearance that the jeans or slacks have shrunk in the wash.

 

I can't even begin to tell you just how stupid this is.

Is this a problem exclusive to you?

Are you perpetually sitting down because the oxygen machine is heavy and doesn't fit in the kitty stroller.

What world do you live in where you can't see the length is not the only problem with those pants.

nothing you ever say makes any sense which lets m.....

Im at home... I'm not doing this, dafuq.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

10 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

I can't even begin to tell you just how stupid this is.

Is this a problem exclusive to you?

Are you perpetually sitting down because the oxygen machine is heavy and doesn't fit in the kitty stroller.

What world do you live in where you can't see the length is not the only problem with those pants.

nothing you ever say makes any sense which lets m.....

Im at home... I'm not doing this, dafuq.

Okay, so I like my clothes big on me.

What's your problem with that?

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

5 hours ago, discolé monade said:

this is a bolt

on a bolt action (LOL) shotgun

 

 

 

looking at your combat image, your bolt, is not present, even IF on the 'right side' (as is would sit) 

the trough that holds the bold is not present and or accounted for, recruit. 

your uniform is much too large for you.

 recruit, you are a shitbird. 

Look again at the one I'm holding.  Nobody really knows how old it is, or even who manufactured it.  Unbranded guns of all descriptions had at one time in the U.S. been as legal and easy to buy, sell or trade as shoes and hats.

Now, you float in here, showing me another gun that obviously has nothing whatsoever to do with what I'm holding in the picture.  And, you then procede to make an apples to oranges comparison as though to claim that every single shotgun ever made is to identical specifications.  

So, when the bolt in the pose photo has a lower profile than the ones you present, none of your assertions are any more than conjecture.

[Doom Metal Alchemist]

44 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Whenever any action is unavoidably necessary in order to comply with a law, the action itself is in fact required by the law.

That works with every law you could possibly name, even traffic laws.

Example:  The law says, "Stop for a red light".  The law does NOT say, "Press the brakes".  Notice that the stop mandate can not be obeyed UNTIL... YOU... PRESS... THE... BRAKES?

Therefore, pressing the brakes for a red light is in fact required by the law, even when it is not specifically spelled out for you verbatem in the law that is written.

Ok, I'll play along.

What you're asserting is that the categories MUST be "hard drinks" and "soft drinks" to comply with the regulations set by law.

What's stopping a bar from categorizing them as "alcoholic" and "non-alcoholic" instead?

[discolé monade]

35 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Look again at the one I'm holding.  Nobody really knows how old it is, or even who manufactured it.  Unbranded guns of all descriptions had at one time in the U.S. been as legal and easy to buy, sell or trade as shoes and hats.

Now, you float in here, showing me another gun that obviously has nothing whatsoever to do with what I'm holding in the picture.  And, you then procede to make an apples to oranges comparison as though to claim that every single shotgun ever made is to identical specifications.  

So, when the bolt in the pose photo has a lower profile than the ones you present, none of your assertions are any more than conjecture.

nah. you know what is missing. it's an old pos bolt action (LOLOL) shotgun. 

[[classic swim]]

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

2 minutes ago, [classic swim] said:

That's a pump action, he's holding.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

42 minutes ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

Ok, I'll play along.

What you're asserting is that the categories MUST be "hard drinks" and "soft drinks" to comply with the regulations set by law.

What's stopping a bar from categorizing them as "alcoholic" and "non-alcoholic" instead?

Go and ask the beverage mananger or better yet, go upstairs and ask the company's lawyer.

[[classic swim]]

Ha

[[classic swim]]

Hahahaha