Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted

So that's all we got........

So absolutely NOTHING about Rick and Morty: The Anime nor Uzumaki?

 

The new Dragon Ball Daima anime is cool!

 

Other than that, fuck Adult Swim and this was a colossal waste of my fucking time.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Toonami has never been a massive priority for Adult Swim, but it was easy enough to run when people went to them.  Now?  Expect a lot more stuff like Scavengers Reign.

Posted

Finally just now saw the ATHF trailer thanks to some screeching guy’s phone recording.

I get NYCC is apparently sacred but a cartoon trailer shouldn’t be barred from the goddamn public. It’s a trailer. Just upload that shit everywhere.

But I still don’t know how to feel about Bento Box Aqua Teen. It was fine for the movie but that’s not really how the show’s supposed to look. At least with Aquadonk the changes were more subtle.

Posted
On 10/15/2023 at 3:18 PM, [classic swim] said:

Unverified bullshit tweets happen to be unverified bullshit tweets.

11C5389F-BF58-4FE7-B1B5-5C8159A2C491.gif.924d39e69670331f597a158601d06e14.gif

It being stated at the Titmouse panel was verified.

Posted
1 hour ago, korosu said:

How did what work out?

Why’d you quote reply me if you’re not even prepared?

 

Some rando user with 1K followers, being a rando user with 1K followers... tweeted Titmouse claimed in their panel that Doc & Jackson have full reign to come back to do more Venture Bros.

 

This was a panel that the user didn’t even fucking attend.

 

No remote footage anywhere of the panel’s actual words, but everyone took the single Twitter user’s tweet as pure gospel. Which got a fuck swarm of people to tweet “oh yeah! Venture Bros is back! This is totally real because I’m tweeting it!”

 

So yeah! Dare I say.... the truth was stretched in some unforeseeable way! Right? 

Posted
30 minutes ago, [classic swim] said:

Why’d you quote reply me if you’re not even prepared?

 

Some rando user with 1K followers, being a rando user with 1K followers... tweeted Titmouse claimed in their panel that Doc & Jackson have full reign to come back to do more Venture Bros.

 

This was a panel that the user didn’t even fucking attend.

 

No remote footage anywhere of the panel’s actual words, but everyone took the single Twitter user’s tweet as pure gospel. Which got a fuck swarm of people to tweet “oh yeah! Venture Bros is back! This is totally real because I’m tweeting it!”

 

So yeah! Dare I say.... the truth was stretched in some unforeseeable way! Right? 

Who is this "rando?" Swimpedia got the information from someone they know who was at the panel. Are you saying others have independently confirmed the statement?

"Why’d you quote reply me if you’re not even prepared?"
I didn't know what the hell you meant by your question. How did tweeting a factual statement (that specific words were said at a panel) work out? No truth was stretched. Jackson said the panelist had wrong information. That changes nothing about the fact that it was said at the panel. It's actually a completely neutral outcome.

Posted
1 minute ago, [classic swim] said:

Then don’t quote reply me.

The Swimpedia tweet was about what the Titmouse panelist said. Their statement, in and of itself, which Jackson claims is incorrect, was verified as being a statement made at the panel. The tweet, being about the statement, is not unverified. I am quote replying you to tell you that you're wrong about the tweet being unverified.

Posted
3 minutes ago, [classic swim] said:

I’m not taking a fucking crusade against Swimpedia. Shit was wrong and incorrect is the entire point.
 

Stop quote replying me.

No. The panelist was wrong, but it's what they said. A statement like that isn't gonna go unshared.

Posted
3 minutes ago, [classic swim] said:

Yep. Titmouse was wrong, and so was everyone else. 
 

Stop quote replying me.

Again, the tweet wasn't wrong. The tweet only talked about the statement itself.

Posted
2 minutes ago, korosu said:

Again, the tweet wasn't wrong. The tweet only talked about the statement itself.

I apologize for doubting the journalistic integrity of Swimpedia over something that was FUCKING WRONGGG ANYWAY.

I am regrettably so, so sorry for this. Stop quote replying me. Please.

Posted
1 minute ago, [classic swim] said:

I apologize for doubting the journalistic integrity of Swimpedia over something that was FUCKING WRONGGG ANYWAY.

I am regrettably so, so sorry for this. Stop quote replying me. Please.

Isn't it great that everyone knows the panelist had it wrong? I wonder how we know that.

Posted
4 minutes ago, [classic swim] said:

I love Swimpedia. Chill the fuck out.

I found the rando account you mentioned. Their source was our source, someone we personally know who was at the panel.

Posted

The way I see this situation, if the quoted part actually happened:

Titmouse Panelist: "The Venture Bros. could feasibly come back."
Audience: "Oh yeah, that means it is coming back!"
Jackson Publick: "No it doesn't, learn some fucking reading comprehension."

  • Confused 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...