scoobdog

Be more specific.

You are incorrect. There are additional sources being processed along with the photo you provided that you did not provide. I can clearly see that the AI did not simply add brush strokes, the photo was restaged using an unknown outside source.

AI does not “create” art in the commonly accepted sense. Consider this: if a student sketching a bowl of fruit that someone else put in front of them, how does that student choose perspective for framing the sketch? Assuming the student can’t touch the bowl or fruit, he or she still has to choose the distance, vertical angle and azimuth to view the bowl, even if it’s to take a photo to use at a later time. i get the argument that people with disabilities can use AI as a tool to create, but that has caveats. Aside from the fact it doesn’t show any mastery of artistic technique, it can still be art only if the artist creates the visual prompts (presumably by inputting only personal photos) along with the verbal or textual cues. Even if you use an art style you did not create yourself, your work is no longer art. Disability or not, an artist has the obligation to stage his subject, define that subject by his own hand, and present that completed image without outside interference. Expensive programs like Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator can use AI to help an artist overcome his limitations while ensuring that all source material is original, but those freebie internet AI sites do not.

Because AI is not capable of processing a visual cue, as in a computer can’t actually frame or otherwise stage a visual prompt it can then convert into a processed image, it is inherently incapable of creating an image without “stealing” its prompts. You don’t need to prove where an image was stolen from: as long as the end product of the AI does not explicitly state the visual prompts in addition to your written prompts, it is factually stolen.

Is that what you think happened? Who was this mysterious man?

This has unintended layers, methinks.

So were you the stupid hayseed in that “storyboard”?

The important point is that you apparently figured out why hoarding silver is a bad idea… or you got robbed.

That just makes your whole weird ass lawyer bashing collage all the more not-interesting.

No silver?! Did the Westpark killer get you too?!!

So, is that what the lawsuit was all about?

They’re on your brothers desk, in the condo with your name on it.

I’m pretty sure Best Raku and I went at it like the Hatfields and McCoys because of that argument. There’s something sad about Kenny getting so excited about the crap he creates. He’s never going to be writer or a visual artist, so this Ian all he’s got.

I don’t know if this is enough of an impetus to get that criminal thrown out of office, but taking away Netanyahu’s ability to interact with European foreign services will certainly impede his ability to negotiate on behalf of Israel and that will diminish his political power at home.

You know she makes him eat ass because he don’t know what good eating look like.

I never realized I had the talent until now. Honestly, I have no idea why you guys are all worked up about those pork chops: I mean, at least they're cooked, unlike his girlfriend. I think she's air dried like jerkey.

Nice.

What's the bus' name, and is he handsome?

Fuggs gave Kenny plenty of shit. He just though she was Buddy.

They’re white. Are you suggesting a white girl would lie about having sex with a pedophile?

All of Matt Gaetz's very underage sexual partners have come forward to say that they have, in fact, had sex with Matt Gaetz.

Anyway, since your example is kind of dumb, I propose another: If 9 out of 10 times you post a picture of your lovingly prepared dinner and it comes to life on your 2MP digital camera's screen, but... ...on the tenth time, your camera "forgets" how to use the flash right and it comes out lifelessly grey... ...does that mean you're stupid or indicate that camera has a grudge against you?

Has that ever happened with you?

What do you mean by "successful posts"?