Raptorpat

did you even read the ban message

where

so much for any union endorsements https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1823175706290831478

might even wonder why this event coincidentally failed

https://x.com/hunterschwarz/status/1823156228438290742

MEANWHILE https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article290986070.html

Europe told Elon that the Trump interview better not violate EU laws. Fortunately for Elon the whole thing seems to have failed. https://x.com/lindayaX/status/1823052643733823640

I've been trying to think up a rhetorical questioning (I've only gotten to try out on my mom so far) where I ask them to name any explicit thing that he did that helped anything, with the caveat that it had to happen because of him specifically and not from having a Republican administration/Congress in general. Then as an example I concede updating NAFTA, because no one else would've risked cutting ties with Canada to do that. I just want to be able to pin someone down, whether it's that they like what he says, whether they just like anyone with an R next to their name, or whether they just don't actually know how any of it works.

guess who is back on twitter in advance of his big "interview" tonight

https://www.politico.eu/article/zaporizhzhia-nuclear-power-plant-fire-russia-war-in-ukraine-volodymyr-zelenskyy/

https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1822710266674684154

https://www.theguardian.com/money/article/2024/aug/10/court-rules-against-biden-student-debt-relief-program

oh I hadn't read that far, i was getting a pop-up to register an account and I ran out of patience

Trump campaign got hacked, they claim it was Iran https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/10/trump-campaign-hack-00173503

this is the NYT article that axios and the Ohio quote above are referencing: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/10/us/politics/trump-campaign-election.html here's the "bitch" video that's been circling around as well (i've seen it like ten separate times in the past half hour):

https://twitter.com/KamalaHQ/status/1822103893427261833

lol https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/09/us/politics/trump-helicopter-landing.html

would you also train your nudists to swordfight in combat

happy birthday!

If they are both doing the same thing - collectively withholding their purchasing power as a means of protest - where is the line drawn that makes it all-american in on instance but evil censorship in the other? Is it the scale of the purchasing power? Is it different when it's business-to-business instead of business-to-consumer?

If the whole purpose of a boycott is that a group withholds their collective purchasing power as a means of protest, what is the legal distinction between collectively refusing to buy Bud Light/Yuengling and collectively refusing to buy advertising space? Where is the line between a legal boycott and an illegal boycott?

How embarrassing

Please explain how boycotts are censorship rather than protected speech.

how will you know who and you know who too react