naraku360

Okay, so, for what reason might a corporation fire people in favor of AI production? Because you need fewer resources and it's cheaper to make a product with it. Okay, okay. They can make it with fewer resources, you know who else can? That's right, the people who got fired! It's almost like this means a wider number of people can produce and sell their own art without needing the funding of monopolies. As a result, you get a new form of art unlike any we've seen before: high budget blockbusters made by whoever felt like making and/or selling it without having Disney to doublefist them at every opportunity. In turn, all the competent people now can make their own stuff their own way and the techbro dumbfucks you're talking about are left with lazy morons who think a fancy filter can do the job itself just because it's cheaper. AI art is the path to an art renaissance by way of stripping away the fabric of commodified art as it stands. Not to mention that, need I remind you, it's not artificial intelligence when it's not intelligent.

None of that matters to making a decision on whether or not to indict and reflects nothing about the prosecutor's intelligience. What matters is evidence.

Yes, because the legal system totally works like, "Well, that one lawsuit for a real crime didn't work so I guess we can't charge for any other crimes because it looks bad to the public." Our justice system isn't a popularity contest. Our justice system should not be a popularity contest. Lawyers, at least not legitimate ones with multiple functioning braincells, don't drop charges based on political maneuvers. They don't press charges on political maneuvers. So, like, shut up scoob.

I'm looking forward to the judge asserting dominance whenever he refuses to shut the fuck up.

They're going to be so not racist that all memes of white people come with a "no blacks allowed" sign. You know, to stop racism.

I can't tell if he's picking his nose or snorting something.

I would not feel bad if it did happen. Which it didn't. But if it did, she earned it.

Eh... Mitch actively makes the world a worse place. I could do without.

I share gifs when they're contextually funny. I don't give a fuck who's in it.

Lets be honest here: It's a real shame he survived.

I doubt Adult Swim wants him back. Maybe if it were just these allegations but the only way to save even a little face, considering the workplace behavioral issues, is to stick by the choice. It looks real bad that they only fired him after his awful behavior came out publicly rather than dealing with it while still entirely internal. Bringing him back now would be further doubling down on actions they're already under fire for. Regardless of abuse allegations, his actions behind the scenes sound like plenty of reason to have dropped him well before the allegations became public.

Oof.

You should give the old version of that one show a try now that it's been a while and we've chilled out. I'd be interested to see where you land on the better version. I'm down for a show exchange if that would make it more appealing. But yeah, people are bad at rating things. 6 is like the lowest most people go, which is dumb and wrong. It's like a 1 or 2 takes anger or disgust and that supercedes whether it's good or bad.

WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY TO ME?!

Nah, I saw what the thread is about. I just didn't care since I thought of that and it's never not going to be funny enough to post.

Most people operate on the C (70%) = average scale, despite it being a terrible rubric. Especially since the average viewer's idea of mediocre (7/10) is realistically closer to a 3/10....

Neat!

Oklahoma: *sigh* OK, maybe later.....