China has a beef with American beef.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

41 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

Citation

 

 

 

Edited 12 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[katt_goddess]

Dude, your own 'citation' actually shows that she had to do more work to prove her case than he did and she won it. 

Further, his micropenis would require specialists to get a decent sample which would be used as a stalling tactic since there are no 13–14-year-olds with the credentials to get the DNA since underaged are the only things that could get enough of a response to find it in the first place. 

Either that of flipping him upside down like a goose to see where the pee happens. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

9 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

Not really. 

The judge in one of those cases did allow that because Princess Tinyhands does in fact have a confirmed micro penis, they could consider sexual assault and rape with actual penetration to be two separate clauses. 

If you want to talk about biased judges, you'll need to explain why everything horrible from republicans pushing for horrible things are shopped to a single set of judges in Texas regardless of where the real mess is taking place. Or how about anything in Florida going to a bleached blond bimbo who thinks there's nothing wrong with stanning for a convicted felon and avid friend of Epstein no matter what the charges.   

So, why did the judge conveniently reject Don's offer of DNA evidence?

[katt_goddess]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

So, why did the judge conveniently reject Don's offer of DNA evidence?

Stalling. Tactics. His lawyers could argue for months about everything from who does the collecting to where to when and then mysteriously have an issue that comes up every time the date set comes around, pushing it all back and starting all over again while the court fees continue to pile up. 

That and 

micro penis. [ font larger than actual penis ]

Edited 12 hours ago by katt_goddess
something disappeared at posting...

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

4 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

Dude, your own 'citation' actually shows that she had to do more work to prove her case than he did and she won it. 

Further, his micropenis would require specialists to get a decent sample which would be used as a stalling tactic since there are no 13–14-year-olds with the credentials to get the DNA since underaged are the only things that could get enough of a response to find it in the first place. 

Either that of flipping him upside down like a goose to see where the pee happens. 

You're every place except on the mark.  A DNA sample could even be taken from a spent cigarette these days.  You don't need a semen sample.

[katt_goddess]

1 minute ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You're every place except on the mark.  A DNA sample could even be taken from a spent cigarette these days.  You don't need a semen sample.

You'd need permission if you didn't want pinhead to argue to exclude. And I already explained how things can be stalled out. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

7 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

You'd need permission if you didn't want pinhead to argue to exclude. And I already explained how things can be stalled out. 

You only regurgitated the judge's cover story, which was all conjecture and hyperbole.

An honest and unbiased judge would have simply had the stained dress compared to a known stain from Don, just like in any criminal trial.

Edited 12 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

5 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

You'd need permission if you didn't want pinhead to argue to exclude. And I already explained how things can be stalled out. 

Permission from whom?

[PenguinBoss]

14 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

So, why did the judge conveniently reject Don's offer of DNA evidence?

One of the discovery disputes was over Trump's DNA. On February 10, Joe Tacopina, who had become Trump's lead lawyer in the case on January 31, 2023, said Trump would be willing to provide a DNA sample, though the discovery period had ended after three years of Carroll's lawyers requesting such a sample.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

2 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

One of the discovery disputes was over Trump's DNA. On February 10, Joe Tacopina, who had become Trump's lead lawyer in the case on January 31, 2023, said Trump would be willing to provide a DNA sample, though the discovery period had ended after three years of Carroll's lawyers requesting such a sample.

How convenient...

People introduce new evidence all the time at both criminal and civil trials.  The judge jusr made a lame excuse to ignore relevant information, simply because he knew it would clear Don.

[PenguinBoss]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How convenient...

People introduce new evidence all the time at both criminal and civil trials.  The judge jusr made a lame excuse to ignore relevant information, simply because he knew it would clear Don.

You're thicker than pig shit.

If it would have cleared him, he wouldn't have waited three years to all of a sudden change his mind right before the trial started.

It's far more likely that he did it but thought he had the power to make it go away before it actually got to trial.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

4 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

You're thicker than pig shit.

If it would have cleared him, he wouldn't have waited three years to all of a sudden change his mind right before the trial started.

It's far more likely that he did it but thought he had the power to make it go away before it actually got to trial.

Okay, so who was he supposed to give that sample to, three years earlier? 

Edited 12 hours ago by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[discolé monade]

[PenguinBoss]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Okay, so who was he supposed to give that sample to, three years earlier? 

lol "Yeah, you're right, but do you know the specifics of the handling of DNA evidence?"

No, no, I don't. I imagine it would be done by a third party, quite possibly the person that would do the DNA testing. I don't know why you're asking, since I don't know why it would be anyone different from when her attorneys requested it to his attorneys offering it. It's not like both sides would meet in a Walgreen's parking lot and go "Here's Trump's spit in a cup."

[naraku360]

33 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You only regurgitated the judge's cover story, which was all conjecture and hyperbole.

An honest and unbiased judge would have simply had the stained dress compared to a known stain from Don, just like in any criminal trial.

Someone is really desperate to defend a pedo with a teeny tiny penis.

[naraku360]

29 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How convenient...

People introduce new evidence all the time at both criminal and civil trials.  The judge jusr made a lame excuse to ignore relevant information, simply because he knew it would clear Don.

Packard, look at what you're saying.

What are you defending IF you're wrong?

Like, how do you know for sure that he's not guilty?

[stilgar]

Hey, remember when this thread hadn't been derailed by packard and it was about how much he hates China?

[naraku360]

Hey, remember when Packard started simping for pedophiles?

 

 

Oh, right. That's current. My bad.

[André Toulon]

I found out what Dokorochan was by googling his sig on asmb. 

It was an anime that started innocent enough, but the main plot line is a kid grows up to create a pedo paradise where girls dont age past 13.

Packard has no issue with the sexualization of children. This is canon.

[Top Gun]

14 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

I found out what Dokorochan was by googling his sig on asmb. 

It was an anime that started innocent enough, but the main plot line is a kid grows up to create a pedo paradise where girls dont age past 13.

Packard has no issue with the sexualization of children. This is canon.

Not to defend Packard here (*throws up in mouth a bit*), but that series is an absurdist dark comedy that doesn't take that premise remotely seriously. It's just a vague background excuse for the protagonist to be repeatedly violently murdered and resurrected.

[André Toulon]

44 minutes ago, Top Gun said:

Not to defend Packard here (*throws up in mouth a bit*), but that series is an absurdist dark comedy that doesn't take that premise remotely seriously. It's just a vague background excuse for the protagonist to be repeatedly violently murdered and resurrected.

I'm going to take your word for it because I dont want it in my history, but the yt comments back then informed me there's a bikini episode and I jumped ship. 

Explaining the satirical relevance of age ambiguous loli to anyone who might see my history just isn't on my top 10 list of shit to do

Edited 6 hours ago by André Toulon

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

7 hours ago, naraku360 said:

Packard, look at what you're saying.

What are you defending IF you're wrong?

Like, how do you know for sure that he's not guilty?

Does the stain on the dress match any of Don's output?  A guilty man has no reason or motive to offer a sample output.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

8 hours ago, naraku360 said:

Someone is really desperate to defend a pedo with a teeny tiny penis.

So, how did this jump from Jean Caroll to any kids?

[André Toulon]

22 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

So, how did this jump from Jean Caroll to any kids?

Well, the derail started right about here

13 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

If Trump is actually guilty of anything, let's hear it.

 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

3 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Well, the derail started right about here

 

He wasn't on trial for any of that.

[André Toulon]

5 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

He wasn't on trial for any of that.

......so just derail it some more, i guess....sure, why not. The beef train has left the station long ago.

Edited 3 hours ago by André Toulon